eddo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
timesjoke said:I never put words in your mouth, now again your just making stuff up to justify your bad behaviors....as usual.
Liar.
Over and over again you have stated my "claims" in here when I have made no such claims.
liar said:I just as equally do not agree with your opinions but I don't call you names.
Liar again:
--a sly jab to call me illiterate and/or incompetent:
timesjoke said:You could try reading.........
--called me lazy and again, incompetent:
timesjoke said:I can't help it your too lazy to go look for more information on your own, if your only exposure to the world is what me or someone else posts a link to you will never know very much.
--Calling me a liberal:
timesjoke said:Are you sure your not a Liberal eddo? Your certainly acting like one.
-- an attack on my lack of offsrping
timesjoke said:Maybe if you were to have your own child you might understand how horrible it is to have someone kill your child.
-- Calling me the name of another member that he often fills in thoughts for:
timesjoke said:Now your acting like Bender,
actually, I never said you were wrong. I simply asked you to back up your side of the argument. You couldn't do this effectively, and you have tried to divert this post away from that at every possible opportunity. Talking about my lack of kids, how I make your vagina bleed tears when I call you names, Bender, putting lots of words in my mouth (like this very quote) and all kinds of things to divert away from your inability to make a valid point.HeWhoInsertsWords said:You actually did, you said I was wrong,
no, actually I'm not. and you are a dumbass for thinking that. [/factual observation]HeWhoInsertsWords said:In this case your defending the actions of France as reasonable and as such the actions of the father as unreasonable.
but you have no proof of said "inaction." All you have is proof of ineffectiveness. They are not mutually inclusive to each other.HeWhoInsertsWords said:Again, I offered you a couple examples such as the many years of no results, the refusal to conduct a proper investigation until the Father made a massive stink, stalling even then as well as their desire to prosecute the father all are evidence to my opinion.
I named off a few escalated political actions that France "could" have used to gain complainace to their extradition request and none of these things or any other advanced measure was done. Inaction is evidence too eddo.
lol, my "opinion" is nothing more than pointing out that you couldn't make a case to support your claims.HeWhoInsertsWords said:Stating a lie over and over does not change the lie into truth eddo. Again we were in the opinion mode and we both offered our opinions and while we both do not agree with the 9other, only you have turned to calling me names for not believing what you believe.
Never said any such thing.HeWhoInsertsWords said:You said the father should not have acted, without that action the killer goes free, so by default, your condemning this mans action means you would prefer the killer go free.
Punishment? nah, just having some fun with someone who is more dense than a box of moon rocks.HeWhoInsertsWords said:No it is your opion based on me not agreeing with you so it is an attack on me based on your need to try and "put me down" as a usual tactic by you. Your calling me names as a punnishment for my failure to agree with you.
Here, let me put it this way:
Your perceptions of what I am saying is way off. I don't know if that is my fault or yours, but you think I am saying things that I am not saying- much like you are doing with the French.
You are WRONG about what you think I am saying.