fullauto
New member
HehehehehehWOW spell check tells me I got that whole thing right. Sometimes I shock the chit out of myself LOL
HehehehehehWOW spell check tells me I got that whole thing right. Sometimes I shock the chit out of myself LOL
Most of us are in the same predicament. scratches headAnna Perenna??? Who the **** are you?
tizz, there are NO animals. You just call them animals. They are really just a group of atoms (not even that) it's a trip down the rabbit hole.Honestly I don't consider any living thing to be "better" than any other in a spiritual sense, but since we ARE social animals, I believe there is no such thing as complete equality in that sense. We have intelligence, empathy, compassion, and emotion and unfortunately when they all get together to play, equality flies out the window. But that is a subject for an entirely different topic.
WOW spell check tells me I got that whole thing right. Sometimes I shock the chit out of myself LOL
YouEquality of peoples is a preception. While yes, there are those among us who are more capable in certain respects, wither they be natural or obtained, it is the one who precieves the person as 'superior' (As a "Better" human sort of speek) that gives them the power of class. Socially in-equality seems to be something horrible socialized in us, I certainly don't see why logically one cannot be considered equal simple because they are more capible. Classism dies when you stop placing people on pedistals due to admiration.
Just ask tizz, NEITHER exists! Nothing exists not even you or me!We are all made of the same things stars are made of...... QUARKS, not ATOMS!
Yeah, you are such a good example of a conformist."Everyone should ******* get their heads out of their *****, realize they aren't ******* divine and just get the **** back in their place amongst the masses and shut the **** up."
Wow. I actually missed this one. I never said anything about anOk, let's finish this. I know what you point you are trying to make, but you're wrong. I'm not a professional etymologist, but I know that the word proletariat is derived from the Latin word 'proletarius', and it was actually used firstly by the French. I also know that Marx used the phrase "lumpen proletariat" to describe the working classes in Germany, way back in the 1800's.
As for plebeian/plebian - it's derived from the Latin also.
So this English origination you speak of is imaginary.
My initial point was only this - that in today's world (you know, the one we currently live in) the word pleb is commonly used to describe someone who is uneducated and vulgar, and the word prole is commonly used to describe the working class.
Common usage, you know? A constantly transmogrifying phenomenon that's hard to track with dictionaries. In other words, a grey area. I get the feeling you think in black and white. But you might want to try lateral thinking, sometime.
Also, as Socrates once said: "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing"
As long as there is inhumanity, ignorance, and intolerance in the world, there will never be any equals. In a perfect world, yes... in our current world, no! **** no!Geez People I am talking about our spirits being made equally by the creator. Gosh, you go on one tangent (which I still haven't admitted to buying into) and that's all people see. SO glad to know my eyesight is better than that!
I got 3 cents, an aggie and a piece of string!Well,seeing as i started this thing off,i think i better throw my two bobs worth in..After much deliberation and argonising, will you be mine..SKATEGREEN.. Hmm. The problem now is we both live at opposite ends of the world..How much money have you got?.