Why America Is So Hated All Over The World??the Reasons

[Lethalfind]

Now you're just demonstrating your ignorance of the world situation.

Pakistanis and Indians have been a part of English culture for over sixty years.

Moslems have been a part of English culture for almost forty years.

They were not imported to be welfare recipients.

The major issue, as has happened in enclaves like Fiji, the Solomon Islands, and England, is that Moslems are great at setting up business, and making a profit. Eventually they enfiltrate the controlling bodies (the same happens anywhere) and then the locals call it culturally innapropriate to have imported people pulling the strings.

If you want workers, I mean good workers, imported into your land to uphold the economy, don't be surprised when the same people usurp power in government.

As usual you have completely misunderstood what I have said

There are ALOT white folks who are completely able bodied in the UK on welfare...the UK will also let in people from other countries (not just the ones you mention) and allow them to go on welfare straight away, their welfare system is robbing that country of its money.

Here when you come to the US you can't rely on public funds for like 5 years.

 

[Hamza123]

What the hell is this drabble? Stop spewing hatemail and start thinking about why it is that muslim extremists should never be allowed to have nuclear technology.

Iran is afraid of being invaded because they know they are full of **** and their nucler profileration will NEVER be acceptable. If they want these technologies the must first remove the mullahs and the ayetollah from power.

Until Iran ceases supporting terrorism, they will NEVER be allowed to have nuclear technology of any kind.

If thet cannot handle this fact of life, TOO BAD!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh and here, this will help you understand what "packback" is only apart of.

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/05/10/russia.putin.iran.reut/index.html/

 

[tomaust]

thank you all for your statements,i just open a new debate to try and find what's wrong with america?why america is hated?so please stick to the subject,thank you,by the way why you repeat the name of rachel corrue or carrie?i don't know this person or this thing ,i have never met it/her
so back to the subject:

Of course, anyone with any knowledge of the origins of the Iraq War knows that it was cooked up by Neocons who are almost all Jewish extremist supporters of Israel. The four leading promoters of America going to war against Iraq were Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. All four are Jewish supporters of the radical Likud party in Israel. Perle, Feith, and Wurmser wrote a strategic paper for the foreign government of Israel and Benjiman Netanyahu in 1996 called A

 

[smutt butt]

MUSLIMS blew up the WTC,pentagon killing men, women and children.

MUSLIMS blow themselves up every day to kill men, women and children.

 

[tomaust]

dear smutt butt you don't answer why america is hated ,try to stick to the subject please thank you,here is more explanations why


Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S. aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any determined president - even President Bush this very day - could prevail and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by laying these facts before the American people:
In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged advancing the territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of anti-terrorism, Israeli forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle. With due process nowhere to be found, hundreds are detained for long periods and most are tortured. Some are assassinated. Homes, orchards, and business places are destroyed. Entire cities are kept under intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration camps. None of this could have occurred without U.S. support. Perhaps Israeli officials believe life will become so unbearable that most Palestinians will eventually leave their ancestral homes.
Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the precepts of all major religious faiths.
How did the American people get into this fix?

Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S. lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive uncritical support to Israel.

Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's U.S. lobby, open discussion of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our government all these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years and to this day maintain a close watch on Congress.
For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill, criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke out-Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul "Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself-were defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel forces.

As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily biased in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally lop-sided in Israel's favor, remain largely unaware that Congress behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.
However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news media candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate America's complicity and complacency. When President Bush welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a man of peace" after Israeli forces, using U.S.-donated arms, completed their devastation of the West Bank last spring, worldwide anger against American policy reached the boiling point.

The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or listens to BBC. In several televised statements long before 9/11,Osama bin Laden, believed by U.S. authorities to have masterminded 9/11, cited U.S. complicity in Israel's destruction of Palestinian society as a principal complaint. Prominent foreigners, in and out of government, express their opposition to U.S. policies with unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since Bush announced his determination to make war against Iraq.
after 9/11, President Bush has made no attempt to redress grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the scene far worse by supporting Israel's religious war against Palestinians, an alliance that has intensified anti-American anger. He seems oblivious to the fact that nearly two billion people worldwide regard the plight of Palestinians as today's most important foreign-policy challenge. No one in authority will admit a calamitous reality that is skillfully shielded from the American people but clearly recognized by most of the world: America suffered 9/11 and its aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.
Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of helping Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should suspend all aid until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel seized in 1967. The suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead to his removal from office, as the Israeli electorate will not tolerate a prime minister who is at odds with the White House.

 

[jokersarewild]

We are hated because you people want to be part of our society, a society with a few more freedoms than your Islamic society. You see your sociey as the be all end all of societies, but you don't understand what it is like to not be forced to be poor, raped, covered, or beaten because your laws say "Listen to Koran, follow all fo the rules in it, and if you don't, we'll stone ya."

Our laws are somewhat based on the Ten Commandments, but the Ten Commandments aren't a bad source...sort of almost close to being like the 5 Pillars of Islam:

[SIZE=-1]Witnessing-Shahadah:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1][/SIZE] Basically, you publically state that Allah is the only "god", and that Mohammed(May he be ****ed by a pig) is his messenger.

Prayer-Salat:[SIZE=-1][/SIZE] You pray if you are sane, not menstruating, or not giving birth. You pray 5 times per day.

Charity-Zakah:[SIZE=-1][/SIZE] You have to give some **** away...it "purifies" your soul.

Fasting-Sawm:[SIZE=-1][/SIZE] Don't eat, drink, or **** from dawn until sunset.

Pilgrimage-Hajj:[SIZE=-1][/SIZE] Go to Mecca once in your life.

 

[lashton]

News flash, joy-boy: America is hated because the third world countries of the world envy us.

Ohh... and compared to some of your less intelligible ramblings... this is your opus. Which leads me to believe that you copied and pasted from another forum somewhere.

Can year really and seriously be that retarded! people hate the US because of stupid people like you!

 

[lashton]

What the hell is this drabble? Stop spewing hatemail and start thinking about why it is that muslim extremists should never be allowed to have nuclear technology.

Iran is afraid of being invaded because they know they are full of **** and their nucler profileration will NEVER be acceptable. If they want these technologies the must first remove the mullahs and the ayetollah from power.

Until Iran ceases supporting terrorism, they will NEVER be allowed to have nuclear technology of any kind.

If thet cannot handle this fact of life, TOO BAD!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Says who iran can't have nuclear technology, the west can say but there is nothing they can do, the US and west will not attack iran simply because it would be economicllay destructive! thatt and the fact that iranians WILL retaliate!
Besides prove that their nuclear programme is not for peacefull use, PROVE IT before ACCUSING

 

[jokersarewild]

Says who iran can't have nuclear technology, the west can say but there is nothing they can do, the US and west will not attack iran simply because it would be economicllay destructive! thatt and the fact that iranians WILL retaliate!
Besides prove that their nuclear programme is not for peacefull use, PROVE IT before ACCUSING

Yeah, people tend to retaliate once they have had the flesh melted off of them...

Let's examine your "peacefull" statement for a second...

Iran, one of the biggest known terrorism funders, would do something peaceful with one of the biggest(if not THE biggest) destructive forces known to man? And Mohammed really was a good human being.

 

[lashton]

This is not about religion this is the west accusing a country of harnessing nuclear power for bad uses, lets think of where this happened, oh yes iraq, aparantly we accused them of having WMD, we were wrong!
But **** we were adamant they had them, geez didn't Nato feel dumb when they were wrong!

 

[smutt butt]

Says who iran can't have nuclear technology, the west can say but there is nothing they can do, the US and west will not attack iran simply because it would be economicllay destructive! thatt and the fact that iranians WILL retaliate!
Besides prove that their nuclear programme is not for peacefull use, PROVE IT before ACCUSING

The US will not use nukes to rid itself of a race of people. We used them twice to save 1000's of american soldiers.

If iran/iraq had them they WOULD use them to try to irradicate israel.

"Iranians would retaliate" Im sure they would by sending some sub-human muslim **** over here to kill women and children.

Why is it ok for muslims to suicide murder other muslims but when an israel kills a muslim its time to kill all jews?

 

[jokersarewild]

This is not about religion this is the west accusing a country of harnessing nuclear power for bad uses, lets think of where this happened, oh yes iraq, aparantly we accused them of having WMD, we were wrong!
But **** we were adamant they had them, geez didn't Nato feel dumb when they were wrong!

No, Bush and his posse accused them of having WMDs.

The rest of us are accusing a horrible country of planning to do horrible things.

 

[lashton]

The US will not use nukes to rid itself of a race of people. We used them twice to save 1000's of american soldiers.

If iran/iraq had them they WOULD use them to try to irradicate israel.

"Iranians would retaliate" Im sure they would by sending some sub-human muslim **** over here to kill women and children.

Why is it ok for muslims to suicide murder other muslims but when an israel kills a muslim its time to kill all jews?

Thats the kind of arrogant attitude your yanks had during the vietnam war, and look how tyou guys ****ed up in that, maybe quit you arrogant ramblings and listen to yourself

 

[jokersarewild]

Actually, it isn't. But hey, what's an argument without historical inaccuracy?

 

[smutt butt]

historical inaccuracy?????

 

[lashton]

you lost the vietnam war because you killed to many of your own men and you were not erxperienced in that area of warefare, if you were experienced in that area of warefare you would have won, so it it actaully

 

[smutt butt]

No, Bush and his posse accused them of having WMDs.

The rest of us are accusing a horrible country of planning to do horrible things.

Iraq has used chemical weapons against themselves. Where are they now??? who knows.

 

[lashton]

using something and then finiding them is slightly different if they have them find them, prove it, otherwise there is no use continuing this yes you are, no im not discussion
btw i meant bush not nato lol

 

[snafu]

dear smutt butt you don't answer why america is hated ,try to stick to the subject please thank you,here is more explanations why
[/B]

**** you and all your ****ing dribble about Israel! We don’t bow down to nobody!!! We don’t take **** ass threats from ****s like you or Bin Laden!!!! Kiss my ass!!!!
Isreal is our allie. we also don't turn our back on our friends.

Kiss my American ass while I shove my Grade USA boot up your ass!!

 

[lashton]

haha wow, and you wonder why this post was started, you may not bow to anyone, well it seems your US treasury has to bow to china