timesjoke

I have many guns, my favorite for an every day gun is my Glock 20c, meat and potatoes. I prefer wheelguns for bullseye, like my S&W 19-3. The K frame is lighter than the N frame.

Last week Fox news pressed the Whitehouse asking about what appeared as Unsolicited political email messages being sent out, here is the exchange: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwog7ao6nHg]YouTube - Fox News Reporter Accuses White House Of Breaking The Law[/ame] A lot of people including all the other networks pounced on the story saying Fox was making up a story and putting Fox down. Well, today this gets released: So now the claim is the Whitehouse had nothing to do with it, that some unknown outside groups must have added their emails without telling them. Right.

Nancy Pelosi says the dissenters are unAmerican in their loud and energetic opposition of Obama care, but what did she say when the same things was happening to Bush? [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3vauUPUAa0]YouTube - Pelosi Tells Anti War Protesters Im a Fan of Disruptors[/ame] Hypocrisy, thy name is Democrat.

I was raised on a farm, my education on how nature provides for reproduction was an early class, specifics on what was considered 'safe' sex was actually from my older brother (at the directive of my mother I later found out). My 'hands on' sex education came from one of my older sister's best friends Here is the hard part, I am a father and let me tell you, the reality of having children is much different than just imagining it. I will say there is a double standard in my mind between my view of my oldest son who is now in the Marines and my soon to be 12 year old daughter. My own situation is complicated by a less than rosy divorce and their mother being what I consider to be a very, very bad influence. I would never say anything for my children to hear but I fear that there might be a bad result in my daughter watching her mother 'get around' with a lot of different men. 11 in 6 years (counting the one who died after getting her pregnant), one she married after knowing him just three weeks and two months later they were getting a divorce. I feel strange talking to my daughter about sex to be completely honest so I try to involve life lession discussions when the chance comes up, like when we see a very young girl in the store with a little baby, we discuss how hard her life will be trying to finish her education and even go to college while trying to raise a child. Then I will add in that protection is more than just preventing pregnancies but it is also about preventing disease.

Women actually learn faster than men most of the time. Men have this macho thing where they don't listen too well while women usually have never fired a gun before and are very attentive when your teaching them. Some women do have issues trying to line up their sights under pressure, but those I teach to 'point shoot'. Women tend to use their finger to point at things/people when their giving a lecture or angry, I tell them to pretend the barrel is their finger.......almost always works with women who are mothers, lol. Hey, you have come a long way Hugo, at least now your able to admit the guy was being verbally abusive, before you pretended like the guy was all innocent and never did anything wrong, lol. But alas, your wrong again, the cop was powerless to prevent the abuse, all the cop could do, all any cop can do is react to abuse already performed

Full story: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/14/nyregion/14shoot.html?_r=1&hp This is a prime example of how at best, the police are janitors, they cannot protect you from harm or stop the "bad guys" before they attack the innocent. If you do not protect yourself, you are at best a victim, at worse dead. This happened on the same block as a police station, if they can't protect a block, they cannot protect anything.

My kind of mowing.... .

People need to believe they do not need the Government to take care of them, until that happens we will never reduce Government. We see a small spark of this with the current Obamacare debate but it takes way too much to get the average person to stand up against their Government. If Obama had done this in tiny steps, gradual power grabbing, the people would have let it happen but we can than our luck that Obama and company got too greedy, too fast and took a big enough bite to "wake the sleeping Giant" as one American said last week. The FairTax as written does not allow loopholes or refund checks, it is the complete removal of the IRS, how much would that save America in Taxes? Everyone pays taxes, period. Right now most Americans pay no taxes. Right now trillions of dollars are exchanged under the table in illegal drugs, illegal workers, shade tree mechanics, weekend painters, the list goes on and on and "all" of that money suddenly enters the tax playing field. Most people have no understanding how much tax money the FairTax would generate and the few who do know the truth are mostly politicians who have something to loose if they support this movement.

The problem with all of this is Obama keeps changing his keywords and refuses to truly lead us to a specific outcome because of the ever changing polls. Obama like Clinton watches the polls closely and changes his agenda sometimes daily to try and gather more popularity.........this worked well for him while looking for the nomination and even for the final election but now the people are getting tired of the ever changing, poll driven policies he is producing. First it was healthcare reform, after a huge study group reported that most people like their insurance Obama decided America needed health insurance "company" reform instead in the mistaken belief he could 'Gin' up some support against "EVIL" big companies. Pelosi, Reed, everyone all jump on board to attack these companies but it has backfired. The claims of cost savings? Proven false, in fact it has been shown that under most of the proposed plans there would be a very large increase in Government spending. There is only one plan that offers savings, and it is also the only plan that was worked out by a Bi-Partisan 6 man committie. Right now Congress approval numbers are going down, Obama approval numbers are going down, most people polled trust the Insurance companies more than Obama and the Government. Most people do not want any kind of Government controlled plan. Obama can force this through, but it is a gurantee of political suicide if he does. One example is recent polls for the race with Arlen Specter where prior to his abuse of his people in the town hall meeting he had a very solid 11 point lead over his challenger. After the meeting he had a 12 point deficit. It is clear now that most Americans do not want what Obama is trying to force down their throats, the only question now is will Obama listen to the people who elected him into office or will he instead believe he is way too Elite to listen to them and instead follow his socialist agenda? An interesting point I heard on one of the news channels: If your private insurance company unfairly refuses coverage or drops you, then you have the right to sue them. There have been thousands of successful suits against Insurance companies over the last few years...........now once your insurance is run by the government, do you think you will have the option to sue them if there is a mistake or an unfair change in the policy? The Government plan will still be run by humans, in fact unqualified, lazy, and completely incompetent humans (as all Government leeches are) so they will screw up even if there are no changes (but it is silly to believe there will never be changes once they have control) made in the coverages. In a private company, human error is still the responsibility of the Company and you can sue them. If a Government official makes a mistake that hurts or kills someone, you have to suck it up. Do we really want that? I know I don't.

Oh, you had said something about women not having the second income to fall back on so I misunderstood what you meant. I hope your 'results' are going well from that, after you had mentioned it I have met several people who have also had this done and they all love it. I am partial to cheese platters myself I guess my point is equally responsible, like two halves of an apple. They are equal in size but they are still different. Like I said, I bet you would be fun to dance with.

Don't get me wrong RO, I completely agree. Men who make babies should be forced to support their children if they will not do it without force, you and I should not have to pay for their mistakes. I am just saying I don't want to hear either the man or woman bellyache over things they should have known before they made babies together. Me and Tami talk about the "grind" sometimes. The day in, day out days that some feel are just unbearable. I experienced them with my first two wives, but so far I don't with Tami, maybe that feeling is the warning that your with the wrong person? But yes, to each their own. So more sexual harassment suits because they are unable to keep a man? I guess that is possible, anything in the persuit of a dollar I suppose. I love buy one, get one free coupons, we call them 'cheep date night'. So are there "bonuses" for better meals? But shouldn't they avoid that with someone they know "IS" that bad before they allow things to get to the point of affection? If you go back to our very first debate on abortion on this forum you will see I said this same thing then. We just don't have the other stuff taking your attention away from this comment now. I have always said men are just as responsible, just in different ways. And I would love to Rumba with you, to me the Rumba leads more to personal attitude and flair than any other dance, your certainly filled with spirited attitude, you should dance very well.

I agree, that is a great idea.

One would think that there would be more of a connection between people who have been together 'exclusively' for most of their life compared to people who have been bouncing around from one person to the next without dedication or love being between them. So if girls don't even want to be taken out for dinner before sex, if both men and women are turning more and more to shallow sexual encounters, you don't think that can bleed over to the workplace? Strange things happen sometimes I don't know, I don't feel like a fool, in fact I feel like a brilliant man, I did something right to end up in love, it is the best feeling in the world to know someone loves you that does not feel obligated to love you like family. That is why I have little sympathy for women who complain about men who don't pay their child support. The guy was obviously a scumbag before you made a baby with him, don't act surprised now when he follows through with his potential you knew about. Being a tad more selective who they produce children with would make a lot of women much more happy. The same goes for men, I have no sympathy for guys who have one night stands then cry about how they were "trapped" into child support by a woman who lied about being on the pill or something. They were fools, and will get the result of being a fool. They earned it.

FOX News Poll: Most Americans Want Unused Stimulus Money Returned to Taxpayers - Political News - FOXNews.com I like this idea, most of the money is not spent yet so why not just put on the brakes and return this money back to those who earn it?

Proves he never reads what people says, he is just in perpetual excuse mode and no matter what point you make, he will blindly defend the Socialist agenda. Bender, The liberals do not want photo ID's because they want even illegals working under false names to be allowe dto vote. They want the ability to let the dead vote by having someone show up and claim to be them. But they have no problem requiring ID's in something as insignificant as a town hall meeting. In fact, I don't see anything wrong with people from other States showing up because this crappy legislation will enslave us all and we should be able to tell everyone voting on this garbage that we do not want it. America may be broken down by districts but every vote cast effects all Americans everywhere. But, I say again, how would the Liberals react if some Conservatives used this idea to keep Acorn activists out of meetings? You thin the racist card would get played? I do. Liberals are the very definition of the double standard.

As long as your happy I guess that is all that matters, but I ask a question, what happens when your 70 and look back at the "bumps" in the road of many different partners and yet nobody is beside you at the end? In the youth sex ed class I help to teach, we cover that God intended sex to be a kind of communication between our souls, a binding beyond the physical or logical realm. The more souls we "mingle" with, the more we confuse our souls and after awile it becomes close to impossible to have a lasting relationship with someone of the opposite sex. But this is just my opinion. The job is the place more men and women are exposed to each other over long periods of time. If your "looking" for something that is missing and there are less barriers inhibiting your initiating a sexual encounter, the workplace seems to be the most logical place to look first. I agree, remember I am the responsibility "preacher" beyond everything else but our society has been changing into being almost completely void of responsibility these days. We are teaching people that being selfish is good. In the cases I investigated with women, the most common theme was inmates who were showering the ladies with a lot of attention. It would start with going out of their way to say hi to the woman every day and asking for advise on things from her, trying to get her into discussions of relationships and personal feelings. Then there is hand made cards or other crafts (some inmates are true artists) but I see it all as just keeping the flow of attention on the woman, making her feel important and then one day they allow it to go further. These guys have 24 hours a day to figure out ways to manipulate the system and the officers/nurses. In the case of the pictures I mentioned before he had broken the ice with this woman by approaching her with needing a "woman's" advise on how to deal with his teenage daughter who was in a lot of trouble. That was the bridge to get her to open up on her own personal information. But even though he did have a daughter, his ex-wife broke all ties with him and would not even allow a letter to the daughter much less phone calls or visits so he never needed help with his daughter, it was all just a scam. So what conclusion can possibly be made from this? Well it seems that the key to happiness with some women is showing her a lot of attention, listen to her and make her feel important with asking her advise on things and give her little gifts now and then and no matter how bad you can be in every other way outside of this involvement, she will love you.

lol, good old slick willie, his reputation is what it is. At least he takes the time to get ladies with more than one purpose.....sex, and humidor

I get a lot from a loving relationship where an active and fun sexual lifestyle is a major part. But I also see where removing the relationship element completely changes things. Eliminating love changes sex into a simple form of physical release, similar to taking a dump, any toilet will do, no big deal. So you don't think an overall attitude of sex being an insignificant event between men and women these days can contribute to both being more likely to look for sex in more place with more people? Fewer barriers I guess is my point. I believe it does erase barriers. Well men have a chemical driven sex drive, while women have a emotion driven sex drive. If a woman is upset about something, her sex drive is erased (at least for her husband) while a man will still be desiring sex no matter what is happening. Now take the same guy with the same chemical driven sexual drive who gets cut off and he has some attractive ladies at work who he also spends more time with than his wife......... All I am saying is it is "ONE" element among many. Turn it around, a woman who is not getting the emotional propping from her man at home works with men at work and one is very supportive, compliments her on her looks, listens to her when she has something to say.....well maybe???? Taken to the extreme, women who work at prisons and fall in love with convicts. I have investigated many situations of women who work at a prison but who end up in relationships with the inmates. These men obviously do not have much to offer a woman, no job, no helping around the house with children or washing dishes and yet these ladies still put everything on the line to have affairs and even in some cases help the prisoners to escape..........why? I have seen everything from healthcare workers to relatively high ranked Security officials who have been drawn into these relationships and not being a woman myself I cannot really understand why? I assume it is the level of attention the imnates shower on the women but I could be wrong. Certainly the women spend a lot more time around these guys than with their husbands so there is a time element with who is giving her more emotional support. Most of my investigations showed a very, very long buildup between the people to include letters, pictures (yes, even nude, lol) phonecalls, and it leads to sex and other things. My first investigation was started by nude pictures found during a routine shakedown of an inmate by two internal security officers. They saw some nude pictures hidden in the cover of a book so it made them look closer and were stunned to understand they knew her, she was their supervisor in the control room and the inmate was the main gate housekeeping worker. She later confessed to a three year affair with this inmate.....sad. All I can say is you would think they would know better, but still it happens a lot more often than the public is allowed to know.

No, you already admitted you never give me a chance, you ignore almost all of what I say and select a couple words to take in the worse possible way and flame me. Your words, not mine. And yes, you seem like someone who could use a few good smacks on your bottom I have been known to 'cherry' a bottom or two for the ladies, let me know if you need me to help you out

I don't buy that, it seems clear to be an attempt to silent those who oppose them, they can't stand up to the questions so they are trying to do whatever they can to have as much of a "friendly" crowd as possible. As I said, I don't mind this rule, but I want the Liberals to live by this standard as well.......but we all know they will not. Do you think a guy with a gun will not also have an ID? I wonder if the liberals/socialists are also going to record the dissenters names? Punnish them later for daring to speak against them? Almost every person who has been highlighted in recent "energetic" exchanges with these politicians has been local people, not shipped in. In a new study most of America believes these outraged people are real, not fake so the more Obama and company keeps trying to lie to the people to cover up how bad this legislation is, it is backfiring on him. Obama's popularity rating has dropped below 50% and is dropping fast all because he refuses to admit that most people do not want what he is trying to force on them. When a real person shows up at these meetings and Obama calls them unamerican or compares them to Nazis, how do you think they will react to that? How about their families? How about their friends? Obama's disrespect for every day people is blowing up in his face. Great, something we can agree on, in fact Conservatives have been pushing for this for many years but the liberals like this idiot refuse to allow it........I wonder why?

You know, I never understood the "poor" arguement against producing ID. Don't these same "poor" apply for Government assistence? They have to produce identification then. How about cashing a check, driving a car, buying a rated 'R' movie or even buying model glue from Wal-Mart.....but somehow these same "poor" would have a difficult time showing their ID to vote? I just do not get the Democrats' point on that one. So if they are "poor" they can't show up at a Democrat's townhall meeting either?

If it stopped for a long time then suddenly came back on her last day that looks pretty intentional to me, but that is just me.

Your right, it is too early to make too many conclusions yet but I have always said deficit spending impeeds recovery because it stops the natural ebb and flow of the free enterprise system we are based on. Artificial changes upset the system and it takes a long time for the system to rebalance.

First of all I want to say I don't really have a huge problem with this idea, but I am speaking from the irony of this action by Democrats. Many Democrats are closing down open townhall meetings and forcing people to produce identification to attend their meetings. Let's take Taxas Democrat congressman Eugene Green, Who has voted "AGAINST" bills that would require producing an ID to cast a Vote in his District. Why is he suddenly a supporter of proving who you are just to attend a meeting but he believes it is unfair to require ID to vote? I actually like this idea, but what would these same Democrats say against the Republicans if they did something similar to keep out the fake activists from groups like Acorn who have been traveling all over the place to disrupt meetings in places they do not live for many years? Obama instructed these groups on doing exactly that and yet now he is pissed off because a few conservative groups are using his own tactics against him. Funny stuff. Anyway, the number of "planted" protesters is extremely tiny. Fox has been putting most of these people who Pelosi and Obama call "unamerican" on the air and proving these people are not connected to any big groups and are just regular people who are angry at the direction Obama is taking America. These are every day Americans and Obama is not helping himself a bit by calling them all "unamerican" for speaking their minds. So in the end, I support this idea, as long as the Democrats will support it for voting too and for blocking out "their" fake activists like acorn members from doing the same thing. But, how much you want to bet they will forget all about them doing this when a Conservative tries to do the same thing?

Motivated by IWS's sig ^^^^ Why did the pervert cross the road? Because he was stuck to the chicken.