R
RM v2.0
Guest
"AstonBarrett" <FAMILYMAN@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47f1293f$0$5633$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> RM v2.0 wrote:
>
>>>> I agree. Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun.
>>>
>>>Or so you claim.
>>>
>>>Can you prove it? Can any of you gun-goons do so?
>>>
>>>Nope!
>>
>>
>> How do you prove a negative?
>
> I can prove that none of my guns ever killed another human... can't you?
>
How exactly would you do that? I know my guns (new ones anyway) have never
killed anyone, but I cant prove it. Proof requires evidence, you cant have
evidence of an act that hasnt happened.
news:47f1293f$0$5633$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> RM v2.0 wrote:
>
>>>> I agree. Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun.
>>>
>>>Or so you claim.
>>>
>>>Can you prove it? Can any of you gun-goons do so?
>>>
>>>Nope!
>>
>>
>> How do you prove a negative?
>
> I can prove that none of my guns ever killed another human... can't you?
>
How exactly would you do that? I know my guns (new ones anyway) have never
killed anyone, but I cant prove it. Proof requires evidence, you cant have
evidence of an act that hasnt happened.