Bob is a racist

ImWithStupid

New member
I'm not up in arms about anything with the Citizen's United ruling. I think it was the right one as the law challenged was unconstitutional. The Democrats are whining because now the Repubs will be able to get the same kind of backing from business as the Dems have been getting an advantage from unions,
It's amazing. Where is all this horrible corporate influx into politics the Dems and the left claimed, after the Citizens United ruling? Looks like it's still the corrupt, strong arm, mafia type, unions trying to influence campaigns, by almost 3 to 1...

Unions outspending corporations on campaign ads despite court rulingBy T.W. Farnam

Wednesday, July 7, 2010; A04

Labor unions have dominated spending on independent campaign ads so far this election season, despite a recent Supreme Court decision that freed spending by corporations, a Washington Post analysis shows.

The findings are an indication that corporate money is not flooding into campaigns as many predicted would happen after the landmark decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

So far this year, $24.7 million in independent spending has been reported to the Federal Election Commission, campaign filings show. Unions have spent $9.7 million (or 39 percent of the total), compared with $6.4 million (26 percent) spent by individuals and $3.4 million spent by corporations.
http://www.washingto...0602133_pf.html

 

timesjoke

Active Members
But IWS, The Unions are for the people, certainly spending millions of Union member dues is well spent buying politicians so they can get the kind of sweet deals like the exemption from extra taxes on their healthcare the way 99% of other Americans have to pay.........right?

If you got those kinds of exceptions for your circle, would you think that is dues money well spent?

 

builder

New member
I'm not up in arms about anything with the Citizen's United ruling. I think it was the right one as the law challenged was unconstitutional.
What you should be "up in arms" about is the fact that the link you provided was again full of *****. 200 dollars? Yeah, right. Pull this one, it plays Jingle Bells.

The Democrats are whining because now the Repubs will be able to get the same kind of backing from business as the Dems have been getting an advantage from unions.
Whaddya mean Now? It's been that way forever dude. For both teams. Build a bridge and get over it.

I know who Tancredo is. What does him being a Republican have to do with anything? I don't care if he's a Repub or a frakin' alien. He's a whack job. Unlike some, I don't just side by the party affiliation.
He's representative of the whole party. You back that party, don't you?

Amazing how you bash our system but don't even know what it is. (also amazing that if it's so horrible around the world, why it's the most envied country on the planet.
The whole world is s******ing behind your back. If you just read the news of other nations, you might get an insight into just how low the last administration dragged your collective image. Such a shame that you and yours are rubbishing the only man who can drag your collective arses back up into reality.

Your own country, Europe and any other free world country wouldn't be **** today if you hadn't been able to live under the protective umbrella of our might for the last century)
Read that back to yourself, you egotistical wee-wee. That's the attitude that has your nation hated worldwide. The tiny little nation of Australia has saved your **** more times than we care to count. And if our forces had the choice, we'd not be shouldering arms anywhere near your trigger-happy grunts in any kind of conflict.

There is a difference between big business and Wall Street. Big business is the corporations, Wall Street is the investment/brokerage firms and banks. You're living in a fantasy world if you think big unions in the US are for the people. They are for money and power.
Well that sucks for you then, don't it?

It says the left tries to claim that the problem in the drug trade should be addressed at the end user, not the supplier, but with government corruption and lobbyist influence they go after the lobbyists/businesses/etc...
Why would the establishment chase its own tail?

but maybe they should follow their own argument on drugs and go after the end user. The corrupt politicians. They can't do that, because just like how Nancy P. is talking of relaxing the ethics rules in congress because her own party members keep getting caught violating them, the politicians would have to actually go after themselves.
Like I just said.

 

timesjoke

Active Members
He's representative of the whole party. You back that party, don't you?
This kind of garbage is why we give you some heat for being uninformed or just plain brainwashed into not seeing reality.

Ron Paul for example runs as a Republican, even ran for President as a Republican, but he is not a Republican, if anything he is a Libertarian but he is also not stupid, Paul knows if he registered and campaigned as a Libertarian he could not possibly get elected outside of the small office he now holds for his State.

Do you agree with everything said by people in your political circles Builder?

The whole world is s******ing behind your back. If you just read the news of other nations, you might get an insight into just how low the last administration dragged your collective image. Such a shame that you and yours are rubbishing the only man who can drag your collective arses back up into reality.
North Korea and Iran both stepped up their nuclear threats once Obama showed he was very weak, Russia and China have both took stronger stands on the security council against us and most the world has seen Obama bow to the Saudi King, no my friend, Obama has not improved International relations at all and has actually made us weaker and less respected from his fear of taking action.

Read that back to yourself, you egotistical wee-wee. That's the attitude that has your nation hated worldwide. The tiny little nation of Australia has saved your **** more times than we care to count. And if our forces had the choice, we'd not be shouldering arms anywhere near your trigger-happy grunts in any kind of conflict.
Battle of the Coral Sea May 4 - 10, 1942

View attachment 2798

b14e4e794bc144f68b4c0dcac0d4c2c3.jpg

 

builder

New member
Not sure why I'm responding to this ignorant wee-wee, seeing as how I made this post for IWS, but they seem to be tag-teaming to keep up. So it's red text for this one.

He's representative of the whole party. You back that party, don't you?
This kind of garbage is why we give you some heat for being uninformed or just plain brainwashed into not seeing reality.


You avoided the first half of my post. Why? Any representative of your party of choice is your party. Why are you now turncoating on your own party?


Ron Paul for example runs as a Republican, even ran for President as a Republican, but he is not a Republican, if anything he is a Libertarian but he is also not stupid, Paul knows if he registered and campaigned as a Libertarian he could not possibly get elected outside of the small office he now holds for his State.

Do you agree with everything said by people in your political circles Builder?


Do you? Or do you read what they say, and then deride them, despite the fact that they are politicising under the same banner that you are?


The whole world is s******ing behind your back. If you just read the news of other nations, you might get an insight into just how low the last administration dragged your collective image. Such a shame that you and yours are rubbishing the only man who can drag your collective arses back up into reality.
North Korea and Iran both stepped up their nuclear threats once Obama showed he was very weak, Russia and China have both took stronger stands on the security council against us and most the world has seen Obama bow to the Saudi King, no my friend, Obama has not improved International relations at all and has actually made us weaker and less respected from his fear of taking action.


I'll interpret that for the people: More scare tactics of the fear and awe variety. Start stockpiling basic supplies because the RED PERIL is alive and well again. Thank-you for your attention. Regular programming will continue as soon as you genuflect to the stars and stripes.


Read that back to yourself, you egotistical wee-wee. That's the attitude that has your nation hated worldwide. The tiny little nation of Australia has saved your **** more times than we care to count. And if our forces had the choice, we'd not be shouldering arms anywhere near your trigger-happy grunts in any kind of conflict.
Battle of the Coral Sea May 4 - 10, 1942

View attachment 2799
Way cute dude. If that is the best you can do, give up right about now.

b14e4e794bc144f68b4c0dcac0d4c2c3.jpg

 

timesjoke

Active Members
Not sure why I'm responding to this ignorant wee-wee, seeing as how I made this post for IWS, but they seem to be tag-teaming to keep up. So it's red text for this one.
If you want to have a private conversation we have something called a private message system, if you post your uninformed garbage on the open forum, your inviting every member here to comment on it.

And why are you still tossing childish insults? "wee-wee"? Sounds like your mind is on something else.

You avoided the first half of my post. Why? Any representative of your party of choice is your party. Why are you now turncoating on your own party?
We don't have kings and queens in America, nobody represents "ALL" of a Party or "ALL" the members of that party.

Do you? Or do you read what they say, and then deride them, despite the fact that they are politicising under the same banner that you are?

More dodging of direct questions Builder?

You slam anyone else who dodges a direct question but in thread after thread you get asked questions your too scared to answer, I wonder why?

I asked you if you agreed with everything political figures said in your circles, now why can't you answer that question?

Because if you answered honestly, you would say no, that sometimes you don't agree with everything but here you are trying to tell us we have to agree with everything someone running under the party of Republican says? Your really showing that you have no intention of having reasonable or honest debates and your instead just being a blind mouthpiece for the socialist agenda.

I'll interpret that for the people: More scare tactics of the fear and awe variety. Start stockpiling basic supplies because the RED PERIL is alive and well again. Thank-you for your attention. Regular programming will continue as soon as you genuflect to the stars and stripes.
You will be the guy to interpret?

That is the problem with you socialists, you always believe the masses need your instruction and guidance to survive. I mentioned facts, you want to divert attention away from those facts by pretending like they do not exist. Well many of us don't need you to tell us what reality is my friend, we can see it for ourselves.

Battle of the Coral Sea May 4 - 10, 1942

Way cute dude. If that is the best you can do, give up right about now.
Give up, yes, that is exactly what your Country would have been forced to do without the help of Americans to save you. The battle of the Coral Sea was just one example of why you owe America for your freedom today, and yet you can't bring yourself to admit it now can you?

 
Top Bottom