German neo-Nazis get their booties kicked

[Peter Principle]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7693@hotmail.com"
<kwag7693@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 26, 10:55

 

[kwag7693@hotmail.com]

On Mar 26, 11:37

 

[kwag7693@hotmail.com]

On Mar 26, 11:29

 

[Peter Principle]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:36:13 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7693@hotmail.com"
<kwag7693@hotmail.com> wrote:

>The right of free speech, which is limited to actual speech and not
>incitements to riot, etc., is encoded in the Bill of Rights.

<snicker>

It's, er, "encoded," is it, genius? Um, why? And how does one DEcode it? Is
the codec in the BoR, too, genius?

Perhaps your subliterate stupid ass meant to say it is CODIFIED in the BoR,
yes?

Jaybus...

It's a damn shame you're not smart enough to know you aren't smart enough.
You're missing some first class entertainment...

---
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right.
------
Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough?

http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf

 

[Peter Principle]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:45:38 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7693@hotmail.com"
<kwag7693@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 26, 11:29

 

[kwag7693@hotmail.com]

On Mar 27, 12:47

 

[kwag7693@hotmail.com]

On Mar 27, 1:18

 

[lorad474@cs.com]

On Mar 26, 6:50

 

[Osiris88]

On Mar 27, 1:01 am, lorad...@cs.com wrote:
> On Mar 26, 6:50 pm, Osiris88 <inde...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 26, 2:21 pm, lorad...@cs.com wrote:
> > > That's nice..
> > > Now explain why they don't allow free speech.
>
> > It has to do with NAZI and nationalist ideas that caused the
> > Holocaust.
>
> Which 'holocaust'?
> The communists killed ten times the number of people that the nazis
> did.
> The Ukrainian 'holocaust'?
> The Polish 'holocaust'?
> The Baltic 'holocaust'?
> The German 'holocaust'?
> The russian 'holocaust'?
> The Armenian 'holocaust'?
> The Chinese 'holocaust'?
> The Chechen 'holocaust'?
> The Tibetan 'holocaust'?
>
> ... just because they didn't occur in western europe doesn't make them
> less real, or less despicable.
>
> > It is a very dark time in their history and they don't
> > want it repeated.
>
> Who does?
>
> > They know these elements exist within Germany and
> > perhaps one day their attitude will change.
>
> Obviously that day arrived a hell of a long time ago.
> Obviously that day arrived too long ago - to be relevant to what
> Germans might wish to speak about today.
>
> And obviously the same undersireable 'elements' that murdered over 100
> million people in the 20th century ('The Black Book of Communism) -
> are still calling the shots in Germany today...
> And by that, I mean the socialist-communists that were put into office
> in 'Germany after the soviet victory.
> And supress anti-socialist speech today.. long after any rational
> proscriptions should apply.
>
> > I have personal
> > experience with this, as a musician. I had to get permission from
> > their government in order to use certain artwork and I had the same
> > complaint that you do now. In fact what I was doing was not in line
> > with any nationalist ideology, but I still had to get permission. And
> > I did because they determined that I was not a threat nor encouraging
> > certain behavior.
>
> So... you checked with the political kommissar to ensure that you did
> not violate socialist party approved limits of expression? You seem to
> be the perfect socialist citizen.
>
> > So that's actually a step in a good direction for
> > them.
>
> Was it near quitting time on Friday?
>
> > It's not like how we allow the KKK or WAR to parade here; they
> > never had control of this country or started a war that caused
> > millions of deaths.
>
> Neither did any present day Germans, I don't think..
> Or do you have more recent information?
>
> As for parading extremists.. they also allow communists to parade in
> the US.. even illegal non-citizens..
> Don't you think that is a more democratic response than suppression?
>
> > It's their issue, not ours, and for you to try to
> > compare it to what you know in your experience here is futile and
> > pointless.
>
> Again.. As a US citizen I am empowered to comment on anything that
> might interest me (other than state secrets).
> I am not an ideal socialist citizen - nor do I want to be. Why do you?

I prefer they would allow citizens to express themselves, including in
a nationalist sense, but they are so wary of it that they aren't there
yet. All I am saying is, I understand why they are wary. About the
Soviets killing even more, well that's Russia's issue. Not all
countries or states operate the same way, or at the same pace.

 

[Topaz]

by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

 

[Peter Principle]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:20:51 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7693@hotmail.com"
<kwag7693@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 27, 12:47

 

[lorad474@cs.com]

On Mar 27, 12:48

 

[kwag7693@hotmail.com]

On Mar 27, 9:22 pm, Peter Principle <petesfe...@SNIPITgmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:20:51 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7...@hotmail.com"
>
>
>
>
>
> <kwag7...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 27, 12:47 am, Peter Principle <petesfe...@SNIPITgmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:36:13 -0700 (PDT), "kwag7...@hotmail.com"
>
> >> <kwag7...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >The right of free speech, which is limited to actual speech and not
> >> >incitements to riot, etc., is encoded in the Bill of Rights.
>
> >> <snicker>
>
> >> It's, er, "encoded," is it, genius? Um, why? And how does one DEcode it? Is
> >> the codec in the BoR, too, genius?
>
> >When you look up 'subliterate' look up 'encode' too.
>
> >> Perhaps your subliterate stupid ass meant to say it is CODIFIED in the BoR,
> >> yes?
>
> >No!
>
> >encode
> >1 a: to convert (as a body of information) from one system of
> >communication into another
>
> >The Bill of Rights ENCODED largely understood and oral traditions of
> >English common law and Enlightenment rationalist principles in the US
> >Constitution as the supreme law of the land and is quite general in
> >nature basically limiting gov't power. This is quite different from
> >codification. The arguments against even ENCODING the principles in
> >the Bill of Rights are quite easy to find, and make mention of the
> >fear that ENCODING them would weaken other understood rights.
>
> Jaybus Freaking Crisco...
>
> FYI, you ****ing moron, the "system of communication" for English common law
> is, has been and always will be, duh, duh, duh, you unbelievable putz,
> ENGLISH.
>
> Jaybus, what a ****ing moron...
>
> ------http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/encode
>
> Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
> en