M
metro-golden-meower
Guest
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:22:54 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:35:04 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>
>> mimus wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:54:40 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>
>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:32:29 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is now clean and uncluterd. it took two days to do that! i had to
>>>>>>> shift a big pile of guitar mags, more dvd spindles than i realized i
>>>>>>> own. two motherboard boxes. lots of pc parts and godd knows what else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> amazingly there where no books.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now after cleaning the actual desk, my back herts like ******* crazy
>>>>>>> and standing is very painfull. i think i shall go use my tenz machine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tomorrow i have to put stuff on the desk and arange it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> i agree. only the trapped nerves in my back don't. maybe you and i
>>>>> should gang up on them and give them a good hard thrashing back into
>>>>> shape?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good. Shall I bring a baseball bat or a galvanized pipe?
>>>
>>> Are you the ******** that destroyed my mail-box?
>>
>> That should be "who" destroyed your mailbox. Since I'm a person and not a
>> thing, "who" instead of "that" is the correct term to use. For example, I
>> could say, "I am the person who destroyed your mailbox." But, I'm not
>> saying I did, just giving an example of the proper use of the pronoun "who",
>> given that I'm a person and not a thing.
>
>Ignorabimus.
>
>> So, let us investigate this mailbox issue deeper. Can you provide us with
>> more details of exactly what happened to your beloved mailbox?
>
>Well, I didn't have an autopsy done, but it got folded in the middle by a
>blow from something _very much like_ a baseball bat or galvanized pipe . . . .
just as i susspected it would, this has now turned into CSI mimus.
wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:35:04 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>
>> mimus wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:54:40 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>
>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:32:29 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is now clean and uncluterd. it took two days to do that! i had to
>>>>>>> shift a big pile of guitar mags, more dvd spindles than i realized i
>>>>>>> own. two motherboard boxes. lots of pc parts and godd knows what else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> amazingly there where no books.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now after cleaning the actual desk, my back herts like ******* crazy
>>>>>>> and standing is very painfull. i think i shall go use my tenz machine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tomorrow i have to put stuff on the desk and arange it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> i agree. only the trapped nerves in my back don't. maybe you and i
>>>>> should gang up on them and give them a good hard thrashing back into
>>>>> shape?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good. Shall I bring a baseball bat or a galvanized pipe?
>>>
>>> Are you the ******** that destroyed my mail-box?
>>
>> That should be "who" destroyed your mailbox. Since I'm a person and not a
>> thing, "who" instead of "that" is the correct term to use. For example, I
>> could say, "I am the person who destroyed your mailbox." But, I'm not
>> saying I did, just giving an example of the proper use of the pronoun "who",
>> given that I'm a person and not a thing.
>
>Ignorabimus.
>
>> So, let us investigate this mailbox issue deeper. Can you provide us with
>> more details of exactly what happened to your beloved mailbox?
>
>Well, I didn't have an autopsy done, but it got folded in the middle by a
>blow from something _very much like_ a baseball bat or galvanized pipe . . . .
just as i susspected it would, this has now turned into CSI mimus.