P
Pastor Frank
Guest
"JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote in message
news:1173710185.136855.137460@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> Pastor Frank wrote:
>> "Gospel Bretts" <bretts1967@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:nju8v21tm5bdm6432gpfhdupdlfsfmp0tc@4ax.com...
>> > On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:10:30 +0800, "Pastor Frank"
>> > <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote:
>> >>"Sippuuden" <sipp@macrosoft.net> wrote in message
>> >>news:y5edna5NbpcM93PYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >>> Mettas Mother wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!
>> >>>
>> >>> No evidence of absence is ever required in any case. The burden of
>> >>> proof
>> >>> cannot be shifted to the non-believers.
>> >>> The only reasonable default presumption in any case like this is the
>> >>> null,
>> >>> 'NO ET,' 'NO GOD' no whatever.
>> >>> http://www.setileague.org/articles/setihoax.htm
>> >>> http://www.setileague.org/editor/null.htm
>> >>>
>> >> You won't meet up with any argument from us theists. We all agree
>> >> with
>> >>you, that the god(s) of atheist definition are guaranteed not to exist.
>> >>But
>> >>then there are millions who have their very own existing concrete
>> >>god(s)
>> >>they pray to and make offerings to. And others have abstract gods: I.e.
>> >>our
>> >>Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16) whom we serve, ...to the death
>> >>if
>> >>need be.
>> >
>> > Is that all God is, then, Frank? Love?
>> > Gospel Bretts
>> > a.a. atheist #2262
>> > Fundy Xian Atheist
>> >
>> That's what our Christian NT Bible says, and we believe it. But also
>> Christ demonstrated His love by laying down His innocent life on our
>> behalf
>> and taking it up again. It suffices us. Do you mind?
>
> Who told you you could select which bits of the bible you want to
> follow?
>
Which "bits of the Bible" did I "select", and which don't agree with
you?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
news:1173710185.136855.137460@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> Pastor Frank wrote:
>> "Gospel Bretts" <bretts1967@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:nju8v21tm5bdm6432gpfhdupdlfsfmp0tc@4ax.com...
>> > On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:10:30 +0800, "Pastor Frank"
>> > <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote:
>> >>"Sippuuden" <sipp@macrosoft.net> wrote in message
>> >>news:y5edna5NbpcM93PYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >>> Mettas Mother wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!
>> >>>
>> >>> No evidence of absence is ever required in any case. The burden of
>> >>> proof
>> >>> cannot be shifted to the non-believers.
>> >>> The only reasonable default presumption in any case like this is the
>> >>> null,
>> >>> 'NO ET,' 'NO GOD' no whatever.
>> >>> http://www.setileague.org/articles/setihoax.htm
>> >>> http://www.setileague.org/editor/null.htm
>> >>>
>> >> You won't meet up with any argument from us theists. We all agree
>> >> with
>> >>you, that the god(s) of atheist definition are guaranteed not to exist.
>> >>But
>> >>then there are millions who have their very own existing concrete
>> >>god(s)
>> >>they pray to and make offerings to. And others have abstract gods: I.e.
>> >>our
>> >>Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16) whom we serve, ...to the death
>> >>if
>> >>need be.
>> >
>> > Is that all God is, then, Frank? Love?
>> > Gospel Bretts
>> > a.a. atheist #2262
>> > Fundy Xian Atheist
>> >
>> That's what our Christian NT Bible says, and we believe it. But also
>> Christ demonstrated His love by laying down His innocent life on our
>> behalf
>> and taking it up again. It suffices us. Do you mind?
>
> Who told you you could select which bits of the bible you want to
> follow?
>
Which "bits of the Bible" did I "select", and which don't agree with
you?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com