hugo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
eisanbt said:Whats with tagging anything that isen't extreme right winged as 'Soviet'. They were ****ing terrible communists, and there is more left then communism. Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Anarchy and all kinds of juicy tibets if you want to toy around.
NOTE: Anarchy is not a 'lets all **** the system and get drunk' mentality, nor is it a philosphy of chaos. If you accually read up on it it makes ALOT of sense and was a very real threat to the established American gov in the 80s who then launched a HUGE mis-information campagine (At the cost of the Taxpayer) in the hopes of destroying the chances of a ararchist group becoming firmly established within society. This is the origin of the "Arnarchist throwing bricks through cop cars/sniffing glue) BS that most people associate with this otherwise fine idealogy.
oh yah, the day the US declears Canada as part of their empire is the day America learns what real gorilla warfare is like. (Our troops kick your asses annuelly in competition, especially in wilderness tactics. Lotsa wilderness up here...and too big to carpet bomb, DANG!)
It makes at least as much sense as labeling the red states as Jesusland. No one is talking about invading Canada. It is the liberals who cannot stand the fact they lost the last election who are fantasizing. Wilderness tactics has a hard time defending against nukes. Your anarchy comments are off topic. If there is one thing the blue states and Canada are not for is limited government, much less anarchy.
Anarchist ideology is total BS. The free rider problem and recovery of third party costs prevents anarchy from being a workable ideology. Try the Libertarian Party for a limited government solution.
Anyone who thinks anarchists ever had any chance to influence the US is not living in reality. The US is not real great at guerilla warfare. I am betting we got more gorillas then Canada if it comes to gorilla warfare.