hugo
New member
States have the right to go commie. Does not mean I want a commie governor for President.So what happened to your sermons on States rights? Mass. is doing what they want and its working.
States have the right to go commie. Does not mean I want a commie governor for President.So what happened to your sermons on States rights? Mass. is doing what they want and its working.
A little to in late bud. He might not have been a Governor but Obama's closer to a commie than Romney. And I thought you were on the trash Sarah band wagon all of a sudden. So you think Sarah is a commie or Romney is one?States have the right to go commie. Does not mean I want a commie governor for President.
Taking money from oil companies and using it to distribute welfare payments ain't exactly free enterprise in action.And I thought you were on the trash Sarah band wagon all of a sudden. So you think Sarah is a commie?
I think you need to read up on the CIR corp. We didn't sell our land. We rented it and the native corp. make a profit that they invest. I don't believe any of our money is going to welfare. That my friend is free enterprise.Taking money from oil companies and using it to distribute welfare payments ain't exactly free enterprise in action.
So what happened to free trade? This is capitalism at it's finest. We rent our resources. Whats wrong with that?....And Alaska—we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs. … It’s to maximize benefits for Alaskans, not an individual company, not some multinational somewhere, but for Alaskans.
In fact, Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES) program, which manages the redistribution of oil wealth in Alaska, brings in so much money that the state needs no income or sales tax. In addition, this year ACES will provide every Alaskan with a check for an estimated $3,200.
.
Here is where Hugo doesn't understand America. States can do whatever they fukking want, as long as it doesn't interfere with the Constitution.The Queen of all Welfare QueensPalin's sole accomplishment as Governor has been to increase taxes on the oil industry by 11% resulting in a 16.5% decline in oil production but triping the oil-revenue derived welfare payment to every resident of Alaska to $2884 in 2007. She passed the states highest budget in history - when Alaska already had BY FAR the highest level of per capita state spending AND the highest level of per capita federal spending in the country. Combined state/federal spending in Alaska is a staggering $27,000 per person! How could anyone consider this Queen of all Welfare Queens to be a conservative?????
OFF WITH HER HEAD!
Thank you IWS.Here is where Hugo doesn't understand America. States can do whatever they fukking want, as long as it doesn't interfere with the Constitution.
Fukking, hypocrit.
She never said she wanted this for the USA. If It's Alaska's resources, more ******' power to them and I hope they find more.
Are you sure that these welfare checks aren't going to Native Alaskan (Inuits) families?She give's out a nice $3,000 a year check to (pay off) Alaskans (voters), (on our taxpayer dime) yet claims to be a conservative. How does one qualify for that free welfare check anyway? Is it only given out to the poor, blacks, Mexicans and illegals? I wanna know why that welfare check is any different from socialism.
.
.
.
Nope, that's an altogether different welfare state socialist program in Alaska your thinking of..Are you sure that these welfare checks aren't going to Native Alaskan (Inuits) families?
I oppose socialism at the federal level, at the state level and at the local level. I oppose socialism regardless of which party is implementing it. A quite consistent principled stance. The fact a state can engage in immoral socialist practices does not mean it should. I certainly will not support the wolves in sheep clothing that make up most of the Republican Party.Here is where Hugo doesn't understand America. States can do whatever they fukking want, as long as it doesn't interfere with the Constitution.
Fukking, hypocrit.
She never said she wanted this for the USA. If It's Alaska's resources, more ******' power to them and I hope they find more.
Is it the one that hands out free firewater?Nope, that's an altogether different welfare state socialist program in Alaska your thinking of..
.
It is not. For some reason "conservatives" at this site love socialism, as long as it is at the state level under Republicans.I wanna know why that welfare check is any different from socialism.
.
.
.
Ohh... I sincerely fukken concur, hugo.I oppose socialism at the federal level, at the state level and at the local level. I oppose socialism regardless of which party is implementing it. A quite consistent principled stance. The fact a state can engage in immoral socialist practices does not mean it should. I certainly will not support the wolves in sheep clothing that make up most of the Republican Party.