Plastic surgery
- Thread starter Ahhlee
- Start date
Humans have flatter faces because of the evolution of a larger brain, which necessitated a change in skull shape, as well as some changes in mouth structure, the tongue, the muscles that support the tongue and the length of the throat as language developed.
The whole idea is that there was a co-evolution of the human flat face with breast shape, and thus there was evolutionary pressure on the shape of the breast to accommodate the infant. A flat face feeding off a flat chest = suffocation.
Breast are eroticized predominantly in the West. If you look at Africans, the ******* are for the baby, not the man.
The whole idea is that there was a co-evolution of the human flat face with breast shape, and thus there was evolutionary pressure on the shape of the breast to accommodate the infant. A flat face feeding off a flat chest = suffocation.
Breast are eroticized predominantly in the West. If you look at Africans, the ******* are for the baby, not the man.
timesjoke
Active Members
But would not the least intrusive adjustment to be just expand the brain back? Instead of a design change that caused a hundred changes to make it work properly, why not change just one thing and be done with it?
Your falling for the same thing RO and the rest of the evolution believers fall for...your looking backwards making what "is" sound reasonable with a lot of backflips but if nature teaches us anything it is that the lest complicated answer is the one that nature will follow, not the most complex.
A great example of why the backward thinking is so flawed.
As Merc just said she had no issues breast feeding so there goes that idea completely out the window but there is more to it than that, if the babies needed the bigger *******, then that means they would have died before hundreds of thousands of years went by to cause the evolutionary change.......this goes back to my point in the other thread, if the life needs to change to survive, then by the time evolution could kick in, it would be too late.
I sure am glad I was born in America then, imagine not knowing about something that is so much fun to play with?
Never knowing what it is like to perform a motorboat?
Sad
RoyalOrleans
New member
You're preaching to the choir.
Ohh... this should be good.
The future has not happened yet. What is there to learn of the future if the past is not understood first?
Idiot.
You're preaching to the choir, honey. I do not doubt a primal attraction to ******* through the process of sexual selection.My point was to show how even science gets befuddled by *******, but at the end of the day we men still love them
I am not anti-religion... I have no problem with one having faith and in contrast my lack thereof.
I think that most theists flock to the church for answers to the unanswerable and believe absurdities on a preconceived notion to dispell science.
And where is your information on the experiments of creation?
The only way... the ONLY way that I will take you seriously is if you can prove hard evidence in that favor.
I am still waiting on the proof on the experimentation that makes creation more than a pseudoscience?
This is where you are dead wrong.
Can we look at the Bible as how people should behave in future, if the tales are not preserved as moral witness of character?
Can we not learn about the horrors of the Holocaust so that they are not repeated?
Can we not learn about 9/11 so that we may prevent another terrorist attack on US soil?
All of these questions about the future are based... based on the interpretation of past events.
The future has not happened yet, but it can be predicted. You make it sound like the future can be guessed without study.
I can probably guess what Obama's motives are, but they can not be wholly predicted without looking at his past.
Wow! Check out the big brain on TJ!
You act as though you found plutonium by accident!
What does the tell me?
That TJ watches the Discovery Channel.
Merc may be smallish, but i can assure you they enlarged for feeding. Most women go up a few cup sizes when milk comes in. I'm a B normally....I went to a fukking E!!!!! after the birth....they enlarge for feeding (BTW it was grotesque, not pretty lol) Genetics preclude how large the ******* will be, but they enlarge to become more than adequate for feeding.
after the birth....they enlarge for feeding (BTW it was grotesque, not pretty lol) Genetics preclude how large the ******* will be, but they enlarge to become more than adequate for feeding.
timesjoke
Active Members
As are you.
As evolution cannot look into the future and see where it is supposed to go, there must be a reason why certain traits would be inserted "at the time they were inserted".
Idiot? You can't ever keep yourself under control can you? You Atheists are way to angry and always look down your nose at anyone who does not swallow evolution blindly.
Again, your still stuck looking backward, you have to pry your mind out of that mode to truly look at evolution correctly as a theory.
How does the attraction to ******* happen if there are no *******? Evolution would both have to insert the sexual desire for ******* and the ******* at the same time to be selected.......why would it insert it in the first place? What was the "need" that drove it and going back to my usual theme, if it takes thousands of years to fulfil a "need" then has not the need already passed?
If you were not anti-religion you would not say such nasty things about those of faith and be looking down your nose at them.
I already said there are none, do you have a lack of attention issue?
Faith is like love, it cannot be measured or pointed out in any scientific way.
Creation and evoltion are exactly the same in that there has never been a way to show either is possible outside a person's mind......yet.
Nice tirade but irrelivant, evolution cannot see into the future so how does it know to add enlarged *******? Your running off into the distance talking about.....I don't know what.
My point you missed was why did evolution give something to human females that it did not find reason to give to any other creature on the planet?
You make it sound like watching the discovery channel is a bad thing.
Education can be found in many forms RO.
My point was that nature figured out how to make the black vulture work without adding enlarged *******. Nature figured out how to make them lifelong mates and even get other vultures to help keep them from fooling around on each other. There are many other creatures that share the life long mate behavior, all without enlarged ******* so "looking foward", what was the reason to add enlarged ******* to women?
RO,
Before humans invented the microscope we had no idea there were things like bacteria in the world.
Did bacteria not exist prior to the microscope being invented?
Of coures not, even if we cannot perceive some things, that does not mean they do not exist. Your inability to not perceive *** "might" be the same thing....I am just offering an idea, a possibility. I know I can perceive him, I feel his love that is every bit as real to me as the love I feel with my children, just a little different.
RoyalOrleans
New member
Such a typical response of a narcissistic statist, inept at providing hard evidence for his cause and denies the other cause a voice out of fear of disobedience.
Declare your belief with evidence, experiments, an artlce, a fukken bumper sticker.
Yep... I did enlarge during pregnancy and breastfeeding. I overflowed a C cup if I stretched a feeding too long, where normally I barely fill an A.
the only time in my entire life that anyone ever said anything about my cleavage and being sincere about it was the night of my mom's retirement party. I left the kid at home and they grew progressively bigger through out the night. One of my aunts said something about how huge my knockers were
the only time in my entire life that anyone ever said anything about my cleavage and being sincere about it was the night of my mom's retirement party. I left the kid at home and they grew progressively bigger through out the night. One of my aunts said something about how huge my knockers were
timesjoke
Active Members
Well evolutionists do have a lot of bumperstickers, I give them that but there is not one experiment to prove evolution either.
All that can be proven is the ability to adapt, not evolve.
You can use smoke and mirrors to try and deflect attention away from your own lack of facts but I admit there are no facts on either side, I have nothing to hide or be ashamed of, I know the limitations of the belief in *** and admit those limitations.
Too bad you can't do the same.....
Chi
New member
Definitely! I'm pretty average, but once that milk came in, they got BayWatch sized!!!! And yes, it is NOT fun! They weighed a ton, were engorged, hurt like ****, etc. (I will spare all the details.)Merc may be smallish, but i can assure you they enlarged for feeding. Most women go up a few cup sizes when milk comes in. I'm a B normally....I went to a fukking E!!!!!
timesjoke
Active Members
I remember the ex had to keep expressing milk to relieve pressure when we were away from the baby for any long period. She also used to throw away a lot of her milk she pumped because she made more then our children needed.
Can the size of the breast determine the amount of milk she can produce because the ex was a natural DD when we met and she always made more than the baby needed and used the pump to help relieve her pressure feelings.
No... milk production adjusts to how much the baby eats, or how much is expressed. Nature is perfect that way.
She made more than the baby ate because she expressed. I only pumped one time. It was during the weaning process and only to the point of relieving the pain of engorgement. Within 24 hours production had almost stopped and within 3 or 4 days I had dried up completely.
She made more than the baby ate because she expressed. I only pumped one time. It was during the weaning process and only to the point of relieving the pain of engorgement. Within 24 hours production had almost stopped and within 3 or 4 days I had dried up completely.