The only correct way to look at the possibility of evolution is to look forward to try and figure out the why's for each change, not looking backward taking away because it is not that simple, there must be a reason for the addition, it didn't just appear out of nowhere without cause.
Right it... changes or mutations did not just happen, they evolved. Such as building a resistance to certain diseases, and maybe even the subsquent treatments, metabolisms adjusting as we travel and live in new places with new food sources... (Lactose... a cow's milk was meant for her calves, but we consume it all the time and in various products.), among other examples.
Taking one of the already offered points of ******* needed to feed a flat face, if there was a "need" for the larger ******* to feed the child, and the child did not get what it needed, it would have died and no future generations. The "need" is a need now, not thousands of years into the future, the baby can't wait for the change.
Why do you put NEED in quotations?
So one day a million years ago, a simian looking creature gave birth to **** sapien erectus? No. No. Through evolution, the gradual mutation of man's features, was enlarged ******* possible. If we evolved from ape, you can't assume that the direct child of our first ancestor looked like your baby.
Maybe ten thousand years into the future, babies will be born with ******* and can self feed? Maybe?
The looking back method is the only way evolution appears possible because you can look past the needs that would have prompted the changes, but looking foward, you see that life is still happening and if it was a "need" to survive, then they would have died waiting for the change.....
Again, NEED appears in quotations. Not sure why.
Oh yeah... Neanderthal man stood around waiting for Cro Magnon man to come tell him he is obsolete.