Re: Definition of God

[The Chief Instigator]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:

>"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>news:di4jf2l4g5a87597jkbkf4pehe1rc5gh8g@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:11:45 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
>> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >news:k4rgf2ti0v4q21vpdh1huaqejsnim6ip2f@4ax.com...
>> >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:49 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >> >news:khjef29jc6dhsh5mofj8i7qd3blljp1p2b@4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:41:33 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism
>> >> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news8abf2d1pomubs5q5u80dftfvk4n8t6q5k@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:05:34 -0400, "Dan Wood"
><danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >> >> >> >"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >news:q031f2hblv80i1dc5uptift4teeeel6ras@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:58:55 -0400, "DanWood"
>> ><drwood@bellsouth.net>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> ><snip>

>> >> >> >> >> It's not a matter of what "I think". dishnest trolling theist.

>> >> >> >> >I checked out R.D.Heilman he is a Jew, not that I think there is
>> >> >> >> >something wrong with being Jewish, but Jews have never accepted
>> >> >> >> >Jesus Christ. I could never deny him.

>> >> >> >> Deny who? A fictional character or Mr. Heilman?

>> >> >> > I could never deny Jesus Christ, your fictional character who is
>> >> >> > real to me!

>> >> >> Take your meds, Dan.

>> >> >Thanks, but so far I've been able to get along just fine without
>> >> >any meds.

>> >> That's a common statement amongst the psychotic.

>> >Are you acousing me of being psychotic???

>> Guilty conscience I see.

>> >If so this is liable.

>> You're liable to be psychotic?

>> Please make up your mind.

>No, you have slandered me.

I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the docket...they'll
appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

 

[Bob]

On 03 Sep 2006 09:54:23 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

>>No, you have slandered me.

>I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the docket...they'll
>appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.

The court will cite him for contempt because he brought a frivolous
suit.

Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.


--

"There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
--Mark Twain

 

[Dan Wood]

"Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:44fb061a.497953@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On 03 Sep 2006 09:54:23 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>No, you have slandered me.
>
> >I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
docket...they'll
> >appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
>
> The court will cite him for contempt because he brought a frivolous
> suit.
>
> Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
> It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.
>
Yes, you get a very good indication as to what the world would be if there
were _only_ atheist!

Dan Wood
>
> --
>
> "There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
> --Mark Twain
>

 

[Dan Wood]

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64g5atls.fsf@fnord.io.com...
> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
> >news:di4jf2l4g5a87597jkbkf4pehe1rc5gh8g@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:11:45 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
> >> wrote in alt.atheism
>
> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:k4rgf2ti0v4q21vpdh1huaqejsnim6ip2f@4ax.com...
> >> >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:49 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism
>
> >> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:khjef29jc6dhsh5mofj8i7qd3blljp1p2b@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:41:33 -0400, "Dan Wood"
<danwood34@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism
> >> >> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >news8abf2d1pomubs5q5u80dftfvk4n8t6q5k@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:05:34 -0400, "Dan Wood"
> ><danwood34@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism
>
> >> >> >> >> >"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> >news:q031f2hblv80i1dc5uptift4teeeel6ras@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:58:55 -0400, "DanWood"
> >> ><drwood@bellsouth.net>
> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> ><snip>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It's not a matter of what "I think". dishnest trolling
theist.
>
> >> >> >> >> >I checked out R.D.Heilman he is a Jew, not that I think there
is
> >> >> >> >> >something wrong with being Jewish, but Jews have never
accepted
> >> >> >> >> >Jesus Christ. I could never deny him.
>
> >> >> >> >> Deny who? A fictional character or Mr. Heilman?
>
> >> >> >> > I could never deny Jesus Christ, your fictional character who
is
> >> >> >> > real to me!
>
> >> >> >> Take your meds, Dan.
>
> >> >> >Thanks, but so far I've been able to get along just fine without
> >> >> >any meds.
>
> >> >> That's a common statement amongst the psychotic.
>
> >> >Are you acousing me of being psychotic???
>
> >> Guilty conscience I see.
>
> >> >If so this is liable.
>
> >> You're liable to be psychotic?
>
> >> Please make up your mind.
>
> >No, you have slandered me.
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the docket...they'll
> appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
>
I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
attornet and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
But don't be so nasty in the future.

Dan Wood>
> --
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston,
Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
> LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
> NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

 

[Bob]

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:16:53 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
>> It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.

>Yes, you get a very good indication as to what the world would be if there
>were _only_ atheist!

Our beagle Artie (nickname for Artemus Cuojo) is convinced I am God
and my wife is Goddess. He better be convinced, if he wants supper.


--

"There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
--Mark Twain

 

[Dan Wood]

"Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:44fb6847.24099500@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:16:53 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
> >> It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.
>
> >Yes, you get a very good indication as to what the world would be if
there
> >were _only_ atheist!
>
> Our beagle Artie (nickname for Artemus Cuojo) is convinced I am God
> and my wife is Goddess. He better be convinced, if he wants supper.
>
Great!! I love it

Dan Wood, DDS
>
> --
>
> "There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
> --Mark Twain
>

 

[Robibnikoff]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:40BKg.34389$C6.29230@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message

snp
>>
>> You're liable to be psychotic?
>>
>> Please make up your mind.
>>
> No, you have slandered me.

Poor baby!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ******* Extraordinaire
#1557

 

[Robibnikoff]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gDHKg.233$Ca4.167@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
> news:44fb061a.497953@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>> On 03 Sep 2006 09:54:23 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>No, you have slandered me.
>>
>> >I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
> docket...they'll
>> >appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
>>
>> The court will cite him for contempt because he brought a frivolous
>> suit.
>>
>> Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
>> It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.
>>
> Yes, you get a very good indication as to what the world would be if there
> were _only_ atheist!

What? Normal? Sane?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ******* Extraordinaire
#1557

 

[Robibnikoff]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
snup
>>
> I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
> me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
> court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
> attornet

What's that? The mini version?

and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
> anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
> But don't be so nasty in the future.

Oh, go **** yourself.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ******* Extraordinaire
#1557

 

[Lizz Holmans]

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:18:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

>
>"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:40BKg.34389$C6.29230@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>
>snp
>>>
>>> You're liable to be psychotic?
>>>
>>> Please make up your mind.
>>>
>> No, you have slandered me.
>
>Poor baby!

Actually, he was libelled. Allegedly.

Lizz 'thrown out of the bar on a technicality' Holmans
--
Rumpeta, rumpeta, rumpeta

 

[Dan Wood]

"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:4m1goiF43jm5U1@individual.net...
>
> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gDHKg.233$Ca4.167@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > "Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
> > news:44fb061a.497953@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> >> On 03 Sep 2006 09:54:23 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>No, you have slandered me.
> >>
> >> >I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
> > docket...they'll
> >> >appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
> >>
> >> The court will cite him for contempt because he brought a frivolous
> >> suit.
> >>
> >> Usenet is the closest to anarchy that most of us will ever experience.
> >> It is not a friendly place. If you want a friend, get a dog.
> >>
> > Yes, you get a very good indication as to what the world would be if
there
> > were _only_ atheist!
>
> What? Normal? Sane?
>
No! Vile, evil and vicious. A dog eat dog world, with nature dripping red
tooth and claw.

Dan
> --
> Robyn
> Resident Witchypoo
> Atheist ******* Extraordinaire
> #1557
>
>

 

[The Chief Instigator]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:

>"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
>news:szk64g5atls.fsf@fnord.io.com...
>> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:

>> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >news:di4jf2l4g5a87597jkbkf4pehe1rc5gh8g@4ax.com...
>> >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:11:45 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >> >news:k4rgf2ti0v4q21vpdh1huaqejsnim6ip2f@4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:49 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:khjef29jc6dhsh5mofj8i7qd3blljp1p2b@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:41:33 -0400, "Dan Wood"
><danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism
>> >> >> >> >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >news8abf2d1pomubs5q5u80dftfvk4n8t6q5k@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:05:34 -0400, "Dan Wood"
>> ><danwood34@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote in alt.atheism

>> >> >> >> >> >"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >> >news:q031f2hblv80i1dc5uptift4teeeel6ras@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:58:55 -0400, "DanWood"
>> >> ><drwood@bellsouth.net>
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> ><snip>

>> >> >> >> >> >> It's not a matter of what "I think". dishnest trolling
>> >> >> >> >> >> theist.

>> >> >> >> >> >I checked out R.D.Heilman he is a Jew, not that I think there
>> >> >> >> >> >is something wrong with being Jewish, but Jews have never
>> >> >> >> >> >accepted Jesus Christ. I could never deny him.

>> >> >> >> >> Deny who? A fictional character or Mr. Heilman?

>> >> >> >> > I could never deny Jesus Christ, your fictional character who is
>> >> >> >> > real to me!

>> >> >> >> Take your meds, Dan.

>> >> >> >Thanks, but so far I've been able to get along just fine without
>> >> >> >any meds.

>> >> >> That's a common statement amongst the psychotic.

>> >> >Are you acousing me of being psychotic???

>> >> Guilty conscience I see.

>> >> >If so this is liable.

>> >> You're liable to be psychotic?

>> >> Please make up your mind.

>> >No, you have slandered me.

>> I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the docket...they'll
>> appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.

>I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
>me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
>court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
>attornet and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
>anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
>But don't be so nasty in the future.

Pointing out your arrogance and lack of basic legal knowldge is "nasty"?
(There's an obvious reason you can't sue -anyone- for slander, if it's in a
newsgroup. Have fun figuring that out.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

 

[Dan Wood]

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslj8i7yt.fsf@fnord.io.com...
> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:
<SNIP> >> >> >If so this is liable.
>
> >> >> You're liable to be psychotic?
>
> >> >> Please make up your mind.
>
> >> >No, you have slandered me.
>
> >> I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
docket...they'll
> >> appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
>
> >I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
> >me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
> >court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
> >attornet and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
> >anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
> >But don't be so nasty in the future.
>
> Pointing out your arrogance and lack of basic legal knowldge is "nasty"?
> (There's an obvious reason you can't sue -anyone- for slander, if it's in
a
> newsgroup. Have fun figuring that out.)
>
In other words you can make false slanderous statements in a newsgroup
with impunity. If you were worth anything I might be inclined to test it.

Dan
>
> --
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston,
Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
> LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
> NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

 

[The Chief Instigator]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:

>"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
>news:szkslj8i7yt.fsf@fnord.io.com...
>> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:
><SNIP> >> >> >If so this is liable.

>> >> >> You're liable to be psychotic?

>> >> >> Please make up your mind.

>> >> >No, you have slandered me.

>> >> I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
>> >> docket...they'll appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.

>> >I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
>> >me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
>> >court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
>> >attornet and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
>> >anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
>> >But don't be so nasty in the future.

>> Pointing out your arrogance and lack of basic legal knowldge is "nasty"?
>> (There's an obvious reason you can't sue -anyone- for slander, if it's in a
>> newsgroup. Have fun figuring that out.)

>In other words you can make false slanderous statements in a newsgroup
>with impunity. If you were worth anything I might be inclined to test it.

If you're too full of yourself to pay attention, I look forward to you finding
out the hard way. (I won't be a party to it.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

 

[Bob]

On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:36:38 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:

>In other words you can make false slanderous statements in a newsgroup
>with impunity. If you were worth anything I might be inclined to test it.

You will have a very difficult time proving malicious intent,
especially for posters to Usenet. Most are too stoned to be truly
malicious.


--

"There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
--Mark Twain

 

[Bob]

On 04 Sep 2006 00:45:35 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

>If you're too full of yourself to pay attention, I look forward to you finding
>out the hard way. (I won't be a party to it.)

You run the real risk of being countersued for harassment.


--

"There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
--Mark Twain

 

[Steve O]

"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news3OKg.27958$y7.22070@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
> "The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
> news:szkslj8i7yt.fsf@fnord.io.com...
>> "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:
> <SNIP> >> >> >If so this is liable.
>>
>> >> >> You're liable to be psychotic?
>>
>> >> >> Please make up your mind.
>>
>> >> >No, you have slandered me.
>>
>> >> I'm looking forward to seeing the court put that on the
> docket...they'll
>> >> appreciate the laugh from your legal (ahem) expertise.
>>
>> >I'm not unfamiliar with trials having had 3 cases brought against
>> >me over the years. I won one, lost one, had one thrown out of
>> >court. Insurance paid off the one I lost. My brother is an
>> >attornet and a partner in a law firm. But I don't intend to do
>> >anything about you, chances are you have nothing anyway!
>> >But don't be so nasty in the future.
>>
>> Pointing out your arrogance and lack of basic legal knowldge is
>> "nasty"?
>> (There's an obvious reason you can't sue -anyone- for slander, if it's in
> a
>> newsgroup. Have fun figuring that out.)
>>
> In other words you can make false slanderous statements in a newsgroup
> with impunity. If you were worth anything I might be inclined to test it.
>
> Dan

Dan, for God's sake stop displaying your ignorance and go and find out the
difference between libel and slander, before you embarrass yourself further.


--
Steve O
a.a. #2240
"Apparently, as I understand it , I am supposed to repent for being the way
that God made me, and then God will save me from God's wrath?"

 

[Steve O]

"Lizz Holmans" <dillo@jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tl3nf2l0v08ti57i71evtloos57j74iifq@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:18:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:40BKg.34389$C6.29230@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>>>
>>> "stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>>
>>snp
>>>>
>>>> You're liable to be psychotic?
>>>>
>>>> Please make up your mind.
>>>>
>>> No, you have slandered me.
>>
>>Poor baby!
>
> Actually, he was libelled. Allegedly.

Anyone who follows a psychotic God must be a little psychotic, at least, I
reckon.


--
Steve O
a.a. #2240
"Apparently, as I understand it , I am supposed to repent for being the way
that God made me, and then God will save me from God's wrath?"

 

[Bob]

On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:21:54 +0100, "Steve O" <sendspam@here.com>
wrote:

>Anyone who follows a psychotic God must be a little psychotic, at least, I
>reckon.

It's good to be back on topic again.

Define "psychotic God". It sounds like an oxymoron.

Also, convince us you are not projecting.


--

"There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress."
--Mark Twain

 

[Steve O]

"Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:44fc09fb.2847125@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:21:54 +0100, "Steve O" <sendspam@here.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Anyone who follows a psychotic God must be a little psychotic, at least, I
>>reckon.
>
> It's good to be back on topic again.
>
> Define "psychotic God". It sounds like an oxymoron.
>
> Also, convince us you are not projecting.

A good example of a psychotic God would be your Christian God, particularly
as described in the Old Testament.
A manipulative and sadistic killer of babies, children and innocent people.


--
Steve O
a.a. #2240
"Apparently, as I understand it , I am supposed to repent for being the way
that God made me, and then God will save me from God's wrath?"