I don't remember you coming in to referee the Chi-bashing parties and call "foul" on the others. Why would you bring her up unless you are trying to divert attention off your gross inequities as a man?
This is my original flame to TJ.
As far as the flames are concerned, I took considerable heat because I gave back what I got, I undetrstand now the mess only gets worse by feeding into the flames by giving it back, but at the same time I am not going to be a punching bag. Flames are not supposed to be a part of the forum anyway and yes I know, your staff so you can choose not to enforce the rule on yourself but in reality it is a very good rule. So being as I am not one to just be a punching bag, and this is a great rule even if it will not be enforced, I will simply point it out when it happens instead of joining in as I used to do.
My responding to flames made by other people was not wrong RO.
But it was garbage the rest of the forum got tired of seeing so even though I was not really wrong to respond in kind, I was still not being fair to my forum mates by adding to the mess. So, from now on when someone flames I will try to not respond with more flames but instead simply point them out instead. There really is no excuse for flames anyway.
This remark, from 3/29/10, is another of TJ's responses to my flame. Here TJ condemns flaming and then he makes the vow to never respond to a flame with more flames.
Fast forward...
Your bias is showing RO. I am sure you will delete this again but if your allowing other people to flame, I will reply not with returned flames but simply to defend myself and point out the flames for what they are. Post #39 in Right or Wrong
This remark, from 3/31/10, is TJ's response to something that he perceived as a flame and then he makes the same vow... never respond to a flame with more flames.
But my point is valid and that is why your running away from it like a scared little girl.
Then TJ waltzes into the voting thread and flames me for an answer that did not satisfy him.
Scared little girl? Gross inequities as a man? Despite the verbiage, both statements imply the same thing: "taking a shot at either's manhood".
The only, single difference here is: I never made such a vow as to never return a flame with a flame. TJ did in fact make that vow as noted on two separate occasion, listed above, and I caught him in a lie.
Though he has argued mightily what he said was not a flame, I would beg to differ the case of flames being subjective. He has also argued that it was inline with the debate, however his poor choice of words in the analogy was poorly received. As his subsequent posts have all been vindictive and accusatory implying that I did not answer his question.
Bottom line: TJ is a hypocrite. I caught him red-handed in lies. He puts up a big stink about it, because all he is trying to do is "save face" and divert attention away from himself.
