S
Spirit of Truth
Guest
"H. Wm. Esque" <HEsque@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:TxJVh.11623$XU4.1592@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
>
>>
>> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:1176729543.856883.19750@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 15, 11:12?pm, John Baker <n...@bizniz.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:39:36 -0700, scottrichter...@yahoo.com (Scott
> > >
> > > Richter) wrote:
> > > >rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I have asked a few third graders what the answer is, and they all
> seem to
> > > >> agree with me, not with Einstein.
> > ><snip>>
> Has there been any new abstract ideas in physics to emerge in the
> last 70 years regarding natures foundations, comparable to the
> discoveries of Copernicus, Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, Planck,
> Heisenberg, Bohr, Schr
news:TxJVh.11623$XU4.1592@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
>
>>
>> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:1176729543.856883.19750@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 15, 11:12?pm, John Baker <n...@bizniz.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:39:36 -0700, scottrichter...@yahoo.com (Scott
> > >
> > > Richter) wrote:
> > > >rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I have asked a few third graders what the answer is, and they all
> seem to
> > > >> agree with me, not with Einstein.
> > ><snip>>
> Has there been any new abstract ideas in physics to emerge in the
> last 70 years regarding natures foundations, comparable to the
> discoveries of Copernicus, Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, Planck,
> Heisenberg, Bohr, Schr