Tea Party Anyone?

I know I'm right, do you know why... because so far the fear and paranoia crowd has been WRONG.
Wrong about the economy, wrong about Obama's ability to handle a crisis, wrong about his ability to negotiate with world leaders, just wrong all the way around.

Perhaps if the ones who are hollering and screaming would give the guy a chance, a benefit of the doubt, or in the very least CREDIT. There wouldn't be as much to worry about...

Look at the facts.. 98% of the people complaining (INCLUDING YOU) ARE GETTING A TAX CUT. The tax increase on the wealthy, is STILL LESS THEN WHAT IT WAS UNDER REAGAN...

What's the problem here?

He's bringing BALANCE to the American force... why on Earth would he WANT our economy to fail or want to tax the **** out of people? I really wish, ney.. HOPE people wake up and quit slamming the guy just because they didn't vote for him and see for themselves... HE'S ON YOUR SIDE.

.

.


HAHA!!! This is very funny. You are having fun with us. You're just playing devil's advocate, right. Nobody REALLY believes the **** your saying... Right???

Running around with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears screaming "Lalalala" is not going to help you see the truth around you.

 

snafu

New member
Just got back from Wasilla after sending in my tea bag to congress. :D

.

.

.

I got there late so only about 50 people when I showed up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

phreakwars

New member
So how many showed up there to protest the tax rates Bush set in anyway?

They couldn't have been protesting Obama, he gave tax cuts..

.

.

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
So how many showed up there to protest the tax rates Bush set in anyway?
The Congressional Budget Office has produced a new set of statistics showing who pays what taxes in America. The lyin' left has seized on these statistics to say that the CBO figures show that the George Bush tax cuts shifted a good bit of the tax burden from the rich to the middle class.

Not so fast. Just in case you run across some of these news stories, and in case you actually believe that the federal income tax burden has been shifted from the rich to the middle class, there's something you need to know.

The media wanted to take these CBO numbers and report them in a way that would make the Bush tax cuts look bad. It's all part of the template. If you can spin a story so that it looks favorable to Obama or Kerry or Al Gore, and bad for Bush ... do it. How do you monkey with the CBO figures to accomplish this? Simple ... you include Social Security and Medicare taxes in your equation. The Bush tax cuts cut income tax rates, not Social Security or Medicare rates. The only fair way to report on how these tax cuts affected the various income levels would be to cite income tax rates only. Guess what? If you only include numbers from who is paying what federal income taxes you will find that the rich are paying a higher percentage of income taxes collected by the federal government now than they were before the tax cuts!!! Now those of you educated in government schools may think that it's impossible to cut tax rates on the rich and then have them pay an even higher percentage of the taxes. Try to think outside the government school box. It has been proven time and time again that when you lower tax rates on the rich ... when you allow the rich to keep a higher percentage of the money that they work for and earn ... they will work even harder to earn even more! As they work harder they end up paying more income taxes than before, even though their actual tax rate is lower.

It's simple. Reward the rich for their efforts, and they'll work even harder. The harder they work, the more taxes they pay. Now, after the tax cuts, they're shouldering an even higher percentage of the burden then before. This is a message the media doesn't want to convey, because it's a message that supports Bush's tax cuts. That's why they're playing with the numbers.

They couldn't have been protesting Obama, he gave tax cuts.
Barack Obama is well on his way to taxing the dog squeeze out of the achievers, the business owners, the wealthy - the people who create the jobs in this country. Starting in 2011, over the next 10 years, Obama is proposing almost $1 trillion in tax increases. And you wealth-envy types can rest your pretty little heads .. he is going to increase taxes on those evil rich people you so love to hate. Jake Tapper frome ABC News has the breakdown...

1) On households making more than $250,000:

$338 billion from turning back the Bush tax cuts.

$179 billlion by reducing the limits on itemized deductions

$118 billion by increasing capital gains taxes

Total: $636 billion/10 years

2) On evil businesses:

$17 billion comes from bringing back the Superfund taxes

$24 billion fromtreating tax carried-interest as income

$5 billion by codifying "economic substance doctrine"

$61 billion from repeal of the LIFO accounting practice

$210 billion from international enforcement, reform deferral, other tax reform

$4 billion - information reporting for rental payments

$5.3 billion from excise tax increases on Gulf of Mexico oil and gas

$3.4 billion from repealing the expensing of tangible drilling costs

$62 million from repealing the deductions for tertiary injectants

$49 million from repealing passive loss exceptions for working interests in oil and natural gas properties

13 billion by repealing manufacturing tax deductions for oil and natural gas companies

$1 billion by increasing to 7 years geological and geophysical amortization period for independent producers

$882 million through eliminating advanced earned income tax credit

Total: $353 billion/10 years

There are people who actually believe that Obama is going to succeed in his quest to return economic prosperity to our country through taxation. There are also people who believe that wet streets cause rain. These people are commonly called "idiots."

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
It's perfectly alright for tens of thousands of illegal aliens to march in Los Angeles demanding rights and welfare. On the other hand, it is not fine and dandy for a few thousand unhappy taxpayers to protest, per the liberal mainstream media.

Yeah, right. The revolution might be sooner than I thought.

CNN Reporter at Chicago Tea Party: It's "Anti-CNN Since This is Highly Promoted By the Right-Wing, Conservative Network Fox"

Susan Roesgen's coverage for CNN should be right up your alley, Bender. She handled it, like most reporters of her ilk, rather clumsily. Say what you will, this woman is destined for mediocrity.

 

phreakwars

New member
Why post the article when you can post the video?

I think she was talking about all the retards whoopin' and hollering and cursing and being just plain ignorant, that you could hear in the background.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G3fvNhdoc0]YouTube - CNN Reporter Harassed at Chicago "Tea-Party"[/ame]

.

.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
At least she honestly admitted that she and CNN had a left wing agenda, and her approach that she was there to argue, not interview, was quite obvious.
 

ImWithStupid

New member
Thread Derail Notice

Is it just me or is there something about Shepard Smith, like his eyes or eyelashes that is quite feminine?

 

Chi

New member
Thread Derail Notice
Is it just me or is there something about Shepard Smith, like his eyes or eyelashes that is quite feminine?
IWS likes Shepard Smith's perty eyes....

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
At least she honestly admitted that she and CNN had a left wing agenda, and her approach that she was there to argue, not interview, was quite obvious.
Oh yeah...

She went fishing and caught the biggest stuttering jackass-fish amongst the protesting rabble.

By the way, I was at the Atlanta Tea Party. I don't like tea, not even sweet tea and that's a southern specialty, but I do like protesting and arguing against this administration.

I prefer beer.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
Why post the article when you can post the video?
I think she was talking about all the retards whoopin' and hollering and cursing and being just plain ignorant, that you could hear in the background.

YouTube - CNN Reporter Harassed at Chicago "Tea-Party"

.

.

What wasn't shown, even though her agenda was obvious, was how she was challenged off CNN camera and couldn't defend her position...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6xWGvdRQ9Q]YouTube - Chicago Tax Day Tea Party - What CNN Did Not Show You Behind The Scenes - Reporter Owned 4/16/09[/ame]

It appears that CNN is just as much of a left wing, hack, "news" agency as NBC, MSLSD, HuffPo, Daily Kos, CBS, etc...

Shows that the tea parties aren't partisan like they want to portray, and totally defines and shines the light on the CNN agenda.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
Again, what was amazing, was that amongst the couple of hundreds of thousands of people at hudreds or thousands of gatherings no news of violence, vandalism, or mayham.

Maybe it's because, unlike liberal protests, it's more likely that the people at the tea parties respect property because they too, have jobs, and property, unlike most liberal protests.

I also scoff and laugh at the claims of corporate backing. You hardly even saw a sign that wasn't handmade, unlike most liberal protests where it's all mass made signs and handed out to paid protesters like ACORN who now gets federal taxpayer funds to protest, so the left gets the largest corporate backing there is, the current, Fed Gov, DNC, Obama Continued Campaign Program, but the Tea Parties are supposedly backed by corporations.

Keep drinking the Kool-aid, the facts, stats, and history are on the side of the "radical right" at least as far as the Obama HSA is concerned.

 

phreakwars

New member
It appears that CNN is just as much of a left wing, hack, "news" agency as NBC, MSLSD, HuffPo, Daily Kos, CBS, etc...
Shows that the tea parties aren't partisan like they want to portray, and totally defines and shines the light on the CNN agenda.
Yep, everyone but FOX news has a liberal agenda, whatever that might be. :rolleyes:

.

.

 
Top Bottom