Timmay is literally Burnore's bitch.

[Suzieflame]

On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:54:04 +0100, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:

>Suzieflame <suzieflame@yachtmail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>Suzieflame <suzieflame@yachtmail.com> wrote:
>[...]
>>>>Did you really just type that lame-ass excuse for a flame and hit
>>>>send?
>>>
>>>Ahhh, the stunningly crafted 'lame' lame is utilised. You've hit rock
>>>bottom.
>>
>>Let's be clear: sometimes a lame really is a lame, and "thinking = a
>>new sensation for you" is so pisspoor it's not even a third rate lame.
>>Useless newbies like Jet wouldn't use that kind of material for fear
>>of being rightly humiliated. It's telling you see it as premo material
>
>I look down the entirety of this thread and I don't see any thought
>from you at all. Its just a monotonous pile of recycled drivel. Your
>entire Usenet posting history is replete with such gems. You seem to
>be content with trying to match what has been posted.

If I could match your talent in these matters, the world would be a
much shittier place. Hence, I don't stoop to conquer.

>I'm probably
>guilty of that too, but I thought you'd picked up the thread because
>you something new to say. Clearly not. You're just an echo from 1999.

It is tragically funny to watch you in self-denial about being
arse-kicked across Usenet for about 1/4 of your life.

Itis like watching a mentally defective 40 year old headbanging to
AC/DC on an airplane entertainment system, thrashing against his
restraints.

>>>Could you switch the lights off on your way out of alt.flame? Thanks.
>>
>>Begging me to leave, Dimmay?
>
>Stay and humiliate yourself if you must.

<shrug>

Looks like begging, sounds like begging, probably... begging. You even
said "thanks" for the bitch slapping.

Suzie
--
Suzieflame

 

[Suzieflame]

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:52:59 +0900, The 2-Belo
<the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:

>Timmay! totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>
>>The 2-Belo <the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>Timmay! totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>>[...]
>>>>When I picture you I look down blah blah blah short blah blah blah halfling.
>>>
>>>Painting the same picture, over and over.
>>
>>You're ashamed of being short, aren't you
>
>Rather, you are ashamed that for the past nine ****ing years you have never been
>able to come up with anything more interesting than this dead horse.
>
>You haven't ever defined what "short" is and why you have this insipid idea that
>I fit the description, despite never having seen me; consequently you have never
>been able to prove that I fit this description in the first place, and given a
>sufficient explanation as to why this is a worthy flame.
>
>So I present to you the
>
>======THE 2-BELO IS SHORT? AND WHO GIVVAFOCK? PPOSTFU SUPERCHALLENGE 2007======
>
>The rules are simple: You get one chance. Present incontrovertible proof that I
>am short enough in physical stature to warrant being yakked at on this point and
>this point alone, over and over, for nearly a decade.
>
>In the interest of fairness I suggest that the "line" between tall and short be
>the classic "average height" commonly referred to in the Western world, which is
>six feet (182 cm). Since you are a hysterically nitpicky son of a bitch when you
>get a bee in your bonnet I will allow you to consider anything below this height
>-- up to and including 5'11.999999999999" or however many nines you damn well
>wish to tack onto the end -- as Hank the (Late) Angry Drunken Dwarf.
>
>If you are able to present data from official records that prove beyond a shadow
>(a long one, too! Har!) of a doubt that I am any shorter than six feet tall, I
>will formally apologize and spank out of alt.flame forever, with you as the sole
>victor. What a great opportunity to gain your first real, concrete spank, and
>the respect and admiration of newsgroups all over alt. ! Princess Leia will pin
>a badge on your flabby chest amongst a triumphant background fanfare! You might
>even get laid for the first time! You will r00L!!1!!!
>
>So get to it. I'm waiting. Well, I've been waiting for YEARS for you to post ANY
>flame emitting more heat than the surface of Neptune, but especially I'm waiting
>for you to quit shrieking the same thing again and again and get ON with it
>already.
>
>Or you can shut up and go away. Your choice.
>
>In any case, you get one go at me; post any of the usual bullshit other than
>that which satisfies the terms of this SUPERCHALLENGE, and you're ****ed. Plonk.
>I don't have the time or the patience.
>
> readies killfile
>
>And... begin.

Only a power-hungry, Napoleon complex-wielding impotent dwarflet
****head would harbor resentment this heavy for this long.

Q.E.D.

Suzie
--
Suzieflame

 

[Suzieflame]

On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 22:50:13 +0000 (UTC), "Jason Gortician -
Libertarian for President 2008" <jasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:

>(Directed at SuzieFlame)
>
>Shitty abstract aside (erm, what do they call the synopsis of a business
>plan, again?), I should now point out that the business model I was
>pitching has been adopted by Nintendo, GameTap, and Microsoft.
>
>And I had the pleasure of telling Trip Hawkins "I told you so!" in email.

I'm sure the cheque is in the post. Just keep watching the doormat.

Suzie
--
Suzieflame

 

[Suzieflame]

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:17:13 -0400, Gary L. Burnore
<gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:

>Poor timmy.

Does that pick-up line work on anyone post-pubescent?

Suzie
--
Suzieflame

 

[Flying Fuck]

Meat Plow wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:21:52 -0400, Flying **** wrote:
>
>> Alcotroll Automated Poasting Daemon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:16:20 +0100, Timmay! wrote:
>>>
>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What's the phrase I'm looking for here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it goes to form, something about irony meters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What page of your lame handbook did this come from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Most alt.flamers, hell, even Stevie Wonder has noticed your tendency
>>>>>>to consistently answer posts with the oft-used irony meter line.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's what I thought.
>>>>
>>>> So why do you constantly repeat
>>>
>>> WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>>> LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>>> IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!
>>>
>>> heh
>>
>> that's ironic. now hop back into your other nym.
>
> That's my Alcotroll irony meter posting the warning,

ah, so you understand the difference between a nym and a "sock"?

> Jop Mockey. There
> have been a few owners that have been burned while these things process
> extreme levels of irony. Better that than the poor sot who died from
> shrapnel when his inferior meter exploded. So I set mine up to warn the
> public.

uh huh... so next, did the nice men in the white coats assure you that
everything will be okay?

> BTW congrats on your new Kook Awards. How many did you walk off
> with this month? 3?

i'm only ironically aiming for the GF. other than that, the outcomes of
your silly awards are your lost time and efforts, not mine. hth ;]

>
> heh

get back on your meds, clown. you've lost it.

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3OZTcNACSY
         .-------.
       .'.-'''''-.'._
      //`         `\\\
     ;;             ;;'.__.===============,
     ||      . <-   ||  __                 )
     ;:    your     ;;.'  '==============='
      \\   penus   ///
       ':...___...:'~
         `'-----'`

"The fact that you're being increasing annoying..." - QuackfArt

 

[Aratzio]

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:46:49 GMT, in the land of alt.aratzio, Aratzio
<a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:18:25 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
><timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> posted:
>>>>>>Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Sharon B <sharon@lart.com> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>Kevin...
>
><Dimmy tries to change subject>
>
>Squat
>Zip
>Nada
>
>5 days and there does not appear to be anyone willing to save poor
>Dimmy from the assault upon his own foot.
>
>Is there no one willing to stand up and speak for that pathetic
>creature.
>OH, THE HUMANITY!

<BLAM>
6 toes down, 7 to go.

Squat
Zip
Nada

<Tomorrow it will be "One ****ing Week">

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

[Meat Plow]

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:37:18 -0400, Flying **** wrote:

> Meat Plow wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:21:52 -0400, Flying **** wrote:
>>
>>> Alcotroll Automated Poasting Daemon wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:16:20 +0100, Timmay! wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What's the phrase I'm looking for here?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If it goes to form, something about irony meters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What page of your lame handbook did this come from?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Most alt.flamers, hell, even Stevie Wonder has noticed your tendency
>>>>>>>to consistently answer posts with the oft-used irony meter line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's what I thought.
>>>>>
>>>>> So why do you constantly repeat
>>>>
>>>> WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>>>> LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>>>> IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!
>>>>
>>>> heh
>>>
>>> that's ironic. now hop back into your other nym.
>>
>> That's my Alcotroll irony meter posting the warning,
>
> ah, so you understand the difference between a nym and a "sock"?
>
>> Jop Mockey. There
>> have been a few owners that have been burned while these things process
>> extreme levels of irony. Better that than the poor sot who died from
>> shrapnel when his inferior meter exploded. So I set mine up to warn the
>> public.
>
> uh huh... so next, did the nice men in the white coats assure you that
> everything will be okay?

Aw look a mental illness lames, how cute.

>> BTW congrats on your new Kook Awards. How many did you walk off
>> with this month? 3?
>
> i'm only ironically aiming for the GF. other than that, the outcomes of
> your silly awards are your lost time and efforts, not mine. hth ;]

Only effort i put into them is a vote then a laugh when you win.
>>
>> heh
>
> get back on your meds, clown. you've lost it.

More mental lames, who'd a thunk it?

 

[The 2-Belo]

Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:

[...]

>>In any case, you get one go at me; post any of the usual bullshit other than
>>that which satisfies the terms of this SUPERCHALLENGE, and you're ****ed. Plonk.
>>I don't have the time or the patience.
>>
>> readies killfile
>>
>>And... begin.
>
>Only a power-hungry

Huh?

>Napoleon complex-wielding

If you were actually literate enough to read your history, you'll soon know that
Napoleon was actually taller than average for the era; the misconception was
borne from the fact that the length of the foot used in France at that time was
a different length from the English Imperial measurement.

And Napoleon was one of the most, and if not the most, effective military
strategists of his or any era. I appreciate the compliment.

>impotent dwarflet ****head would harbor resentment

The only thing I resent is the hideous lack of originality from any of you
shitheads.


--
The 2-Belo [the2beloATmsdDOTbiglobeDOTneDOTjp]
All-Seeing All-Knowing Glorious Emperor for Life, Meow [Ret.]
The alt.fan.karl-malden.nose Webcenter Museum:
http://www.godhatesjanks.org/webcenter/
auk: Hammer of Thor by Special Decree 1999
aavf3: mhm21x20
Top Usenet Asshole #16
Lits Slut #4

"I ask for 'fal tor pan'! The restore from backup!"

 

[Suzieflame]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:49:11 +0900, The 2-Belo
<the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:

>Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>
>[...]
>
>>>In any case, you get one go at me; post any of the usual bullshit other than
>>>that which satisfies the terms of this SUPERCHALLENGE, and you're ****ed. Plonk.
>>>I don't have the time or the patience.
>>>
>>> readies killfile
>>>
>>>And... begin.
>>
>>Only a power-hungry
>
>Huh?
>
>>Napoleon complex-wielding
>
>If you were actually literate enough to read your history, you'll soon know that
>Napoleon was actually taller than average for the era; the misconception was
>borne from the fact that the length of the foot used in France at that time was
>a different length from the English Imperial measurement.

He was still a shortarse, like you.

>And Napoleon was one of the most, and if not the most, effective military
>strategists of his or any era. I appreciate the compliment.

You need to read your history a little more carefully and look up
things like a disasterous campaign on Russia during which he
heroically turned an army of 700,000 men into one of just 70,000 in
under a year, and a small military setback at a place called
"Waterloo".

>>impotent dwarflet ****head would harbor resentment
>
>The only thing I resent is the hideous lack of originality from any of you
>shitheads.

Try not to explode with frustation, shortstuff.

Suzie
--
Suzieflame

 

[The 2-Belo]

Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:

>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:49:11 +0900, The 2-Belo
><the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>
>>Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>In any case, you get one go at me; post any of the usual bullshit other than
>>>>that which satisfies the terms of this SUPERCHALLENGE, and you're ****ed. Plonk.
>>>>I don't have the time or the patience.
>>>>
>>>> readies killfile
>>>>
>>>>And... begin.
>>>
>>>Only a power-hungry
>>
>>Huh?
>>
>>>Napoleon complex-wielding
>>
>>If you were actually literate enough to read your history, you'll soon know that
>>Napoleon was actually taller than average for the era; the misconception was
>>borne from the fact that the length of the foot used in France at that time was
>>a different length from the English Imperial measurement.
>
>He was still a shortarse

Heh, check this out. It's Suziethorne! Did you guys finally decided to merge or
spawn or whatever you insipid little insects do to generate offspring?

Sheesh, you can't even copy a decent flame to save your life.

>You need to read your history a little more carefully and look up
>things like a disasterous campaign on Russia during which he
>heroically turned an army of 700,000 men into one of just 70,000 in
>under a year, and a small military setback at a place called
>"Waterloo".

<wikipedia>
Napoleon [...] led the French army, modernized and reformed, to score several
major victories. His campaigns are studied at military academies all over the
world and he is widely regarded as one of history's greatest commanders. [...]
Napoleon was hated by his many enemies, but respected by them at the same time.
[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of] Wellington [whom defeated Napoleon's army at
Waterloo], when asked who he thought was the greatest general of the day,
answered: "In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon."
</wikipedia>

What have you done lately, ya ****in' walrus?

>>>impotent dwarflet ****head would harbor resentment
>>
>>The only thing I resent is the hideous lack of originality from any of you
>>shitheads.
>
>Try not to explode with frustation, shortstuff.

You're welcome to answer the original post. Or you can go **** yourself with the
Graf Zeppelin. It's up to you.


--
The 2-Belo [the2beloATmsdDOTbiglobeDOTneDOTjp]
All-Seeing All-Knowing Glorious Emperor for Life, Meow [Ret.]
The alt.fan.karl-malden.nose Webcenter Museum:
http://www.godhatesjanks.org/webcenter/
auk: Hammer of Thor by Special Decree 1999
aavf3: mhm21x20
Top Usenet Asshole #16
Lits Slut #4

"I ask for 'fal tor pan'! The restore from backup!"

 

[Avoid normal situations.]

In alt.flame The 2-Belo <the2belo@msd.bigremovethislobe.ne.jp> wrote:

[..]

> If you were actually literate enough to read your history, you'll soon know that
> Napoleon was actually taller than average for the era; the misconception was
> borne from the fact that the length of the foot used in France at that time was
> a different length from the English Imperial measurement.

Proof, please.

--
alt.flame Special Forces
"Human kind
Cannot bear very much reality."
-- T. S. Eliot

 

[Suzieflame]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:59:25 +0900, The 2-Belo
<the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:

>Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:49:11 +0900, The 2-Belo
>><the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>>>Suzieflame totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>In any case, you get one go at me; post any of the usual bullshit other than
>>>>>that which satisfies the terms of this SUPERCHALLENGE, and you're ****ed. Plonk.
>>>>>I don't have the time or the patience.
>>>>>
>>>>> readies killfile
>>>>>
>>>>>And... begin.
>>>>
>>>>Only a power-hungry
>>>
>>>Huh?
>>>
>>>>Napoleon complex-wielding
>>>
>>>If you were actually literate enough to read your history, you'll soon know that
>>>Napoleon was actually taller than average for the era; the misconception was
>>>borne from the fact that the length of the foot used in France at that time was
>>>a different length from the English Imperial measurement.
>>
>>He was still a shortarse
>
>Heh, check this out. It's Suziethorne! Did you guys finally decided to merge or
>spawn or whatever you insipid little insects do to generate offspring?

You really are touchy about being a wizened little dwarf, aren't you?

>>You need to read your history a little more carefully and look up
>>things like a disasterous campaign on Russia during which he
>>heroically turned an army of 700,000 men into one of just 70,000 in
>>under a year, and a small military setback at a place called
>>"Waterloo".
>
><wikipedia>
>Napoleon [...] led the French army, modernized and reformed, to score several
>major victories. His campaigns are studied at military academies all over the
>world and he is widely regarded as one of history's greatest commanders. [...]
>Napoleon was hated by his many enemies, but respected by them at the same time.
>[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of] Wellington [whom defeated Napoleon's army at
>Waterloo], when asked who he thought was the greatest general of the day,
>answered: "In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon."
></wikipedia>

<same wikipedia article>
"A disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812 marked a turning point in
Napoleon's fortunes. The campaign left his Grande Arm

 

[Flying Fuck]

Meat Plow wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:37:18 -0400, Flying **** wrote:
>
>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:21:52 -0400, Flying **** wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alcotroll Automated Poasting Daemon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:16:20 +0100, Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Timmay! wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>What's the phrase I'm looking for here?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If it goes to form, something about irony meters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What page of your lame handbook did this come from?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Most alt.flamers, hell, even Stevie Wonder has noticed your tendency
>>>>>>>>to consistently answer posts with the oft-used irony meter line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's what I thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So why do you constantly repeat
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>>>>> LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>>>>> IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!
>>>>>
>>>>> heh
>>>>
>>>> that's ironic. now hop back into your other nym.
>>>
>>> That's my Alcotroll irony meter posting the warning,
>>
>> ah, so you understand the difference between a nym and a "sock"?
>>
>>> Jop Mockey. There
>>> have been a few owners that have been burned while these things process
>>> extreme levels of irony. Better that than the poor sot who died from
>>> shrapnel when his inferior meter exploded. So I set mine up to warn the
>>> public.
>>
>> uh huh... so next, did the nice men in the white coats assure you that
>> everything will be okay?
>
> Aw look a mental illness lames, how cute.

waddayamean?

i was talking about the guys in the ice cream truck you tried to carjack.

>
>>> BTW congrats on your new Kook Awards. How many did you walk off
>>> with this month? 3?
>>
>> i'm only ironically aiming for the GF. other than that, the outcomes of
>> your silly awards are your lost time and efforts, not mine. hth ;]
>
> Only effort i put into them is a vote then a laugh when you win.

so that's 3 laughs this month for you? you are probably over quota.

>>>
>>> heh
>>
>> get back on your meds, clown. you've lost it.
>
> More mental lames, who'd a thunk it?

i figured that meds lames were the pinnacle of torlling, since AUK seems to
prefer them, but perhaps you **** goats instead?

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3OZTcNACSY
         .-------.
       .'.-'''''-.'._
      //`         `\\\
     ;;             ;;'.__.===============,
     ||      . <-   ||  __                 )
     ;:    your     ;;.'  '==============='
      \\   penus   ///
       ':...___...:'~
         `'-----'`

"The fact that you're being increasing annoying..." - QuackfArt

 

[Bill Cleere]

On Oct 9, 7:43 am,

 

[Timmay!]

<mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:

>do britishers also hold that the same day as americans
>the first tuesday after the first monday of november?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mischief_Night

--
Timmay!

Kook of the Month May 1999
Golden Killfile Sept 1999
Looney Maroon Dec 1998
Looney Maroon Feb 1999
Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999
Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000
George Pickett Sept 2000
George Pickett Oct 2000
Busted Urinal Award
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Tar & Feathers Award
Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades

 

[Timmay!]

Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>Timmay! wrote:
>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>That's what I thought.
>>
>>So why do you constantly repeat the irony meter line? Do you want to
>>give the impression of a mentally incompetent fool? Or is it because
>>you've got a short memory and that's all that pops into your head?
>
>WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!

The irony of you snipping a comment about irony meters only to reply
with yet another irony meter line is completely lost on you, isn't it?

--
Timmay!

Kook of the Month May 1999
Golden Killfile Sept 1999
Looney Maroon Dec 1998
Looney Maroon Feb 1999
Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999
Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000
George Pickett Sept 2000
George Pickett Oct 2000
Busted Urinal Award
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Tar & Feathers Award
Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades

 

[Timmay!]

Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>>>>Still only one stupid kook in sight. This has to be a first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Wow, my credibility just took a hit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You never had any in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not like you could think of a line with out me feeding you with sarcasm.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you wanna wear a big sign that screams 'kick me', its best not to
>>>>>whine about being kicked, unless you enjoy whining? <--------------------------- Short yellow bus riders read here
>>>>
>>>>Where's the whining, moron? Specifically point out the term or phrase
>>>>you believe to be a whine. Just want to be able to pinpoint where in
>>>>your education the teachers went wrong. My current theory is they
>>>>actually felt you were educable.
>>>
>>>There has been a mysterious pattern to my posts for the past decade.
>>
>>Stupidity, lameness and complete lack of humor.
>
>You asked for directions to your whining, you whining witless wonder.
>You were given directions for your whining. Now you're whining about
>being given directions to your whining. Can't you do anything but
>whine? Its tediously ****ing boring. Do you realise how dull it is to
>plod through your posts, kicking your lazy, unimaginative arse all
>over alt.flame? Its so one-sided it isn't funny.
>
>>>Someone makes a comment, I follow it with another comment. Generally
>>>the two comments have a theme and can be thought of as part of the
>>>same 'conversation'. I think I've given you too much of a clue. Do you
>>>require more help pinpointing it? If so, please board the short yellow
>>>bus and wipe the drool from your chin when you board.
>>
>>Translation: Puke up any ole delusional gibberish and call it a (f)lame.
>
>All aboard the short yellow bus. Next stop, basic english
>comprehension for unimaginitive cretins, where you'll be getting off.
>
>>>>>>You are pathetic. It is like when everyone gets bored with these
>>>>>>monotonic lames you claim to be flames and walks away shaking their
>>>>>>head, you then prance and preen claiming your victory once more.
>>>>>
>>>>>It is hardly difficult to outwit someone posting from AUK.
>>>>
>>>>I am, wow, this sure looks like aav3f. But this is your fantasy, do continue.
>>>
>>>It might be crossposted there, but you subscribe to and read AUK.
>>
>>Really? How can you be sure? Oh, that's right, you follow people
>>around usenet.
>
>Sharon said the same thing and she got spanked over it. Every time she
>plucks up the courage to post to alt.flame, she finds me there to punt
>her back into oblivion. Being the generous person I am I'm going to
>allow you to drop it and never mention it again. This is a one time
>offer. So what's it to be? Do I follow people around Usenet or are you
>a paranoid pillock who wants to spend some Usenet time being my bitch?
>
>>>You'd be reading this from AUK if I cut aav3f. Of course you could
>>>still deny that you read AUK, but we both know that would be futile.
>>
>>But you didn't did you. Funny you make a lot of delusional claims but
>>you never can quite back them up.
>
>I've got no need to back anything up because you've not stated
>anything that needed refuting. Now, if you were to state that you
>didn't read AUK, which you've been extremely hesitant to say, then I
>might have to wade in and prove you to be a liar. Roll the dice and
>make your choice.
>
>>>>>They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning,
>>>>
>>>>I can see where you could get that impression.
>>>
>>>That's not a very nice thing to say about your fellow AUK'ers. Do they
>>>know you hold them in such a low esteem?
>
>Hmmmm. No response, obviously correct.
>
><guffaw>
>
>>>>The problem is that you write it, people point and laugh at you, you
>>>>then post more delusional screed. Not like it requires AC Doyle to
>>>>deduce you are a half-wit.
>>>
>>>The people doing the pointing and laughing are the very same people
>>>that give you an impression of having a lower than average ability in
>>>deductive reasoning.
>>
>>Ah, the context snip with the follow-up based upon the changed
>>context. How cute, useless bute cute. I am sure self styled flamers
>>enjoy being characterized as cute.
>>
>>Which explains why deductive reasoning is not required for your posts,
>>half-wit.
>
>There was no context snip, you utterly confused spastic.
>
>Here I make a remark about AUK'ers:
>
>>"They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning,"
>
>You snip my sentence and reply with:
>
>>"I can see where you could get that impression."
>
>There is nothing unambiguous about your reply. Its not cut. Its not
>taken out of context. It cannot be interpreted any other way. If you
>meant to say something different, you did a ****ing poor job of it. If
>you can't express yourself properly then unplug your keyboard and get
>the **** out of here. You clearly don't belong.
>
>>>Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people
>>>we both agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a few names
>>>and don't think highly of me? I'll just grab that box of tissues...
>>
>>Well, you have been quite regular in your spewing to usenet, ever
>>since you were named "Burnore's Bitch". So yeah, evidence does support
>>that conclusion.
>
>There is no evidence of anything except your craziness, kook. You're
>reaching the bottom of the barrel and have even taken to claiming I'm
>following people around Usenet. Don't you realise how completely
>laughable your statement is? You're completely kooking out.
>
>>>>>subnormally low intelligence, virtually no creativity and they can't
>>>>>quite grasp the point that they are inferior creatures to the rest of
>>>>>the population. Victory is assured before I post.
>>>>
>>>>Nothing like demonstrating that I am right.
>>>>Did you do that whole "staying alive" bit?
>>>
>>>Forgive me for not knowing what the **** you're babbling about when
>>>you make an obscure reference to some 70s film.
>>
>>Not like it is hard to get one by you, eh, Dimmy.
>>
>>Hint: You claimed victory", right on schedule. Which given your
>>preening egoist nature would require a victory dance . Travolta would
>>seem right up your alley.
>
>Victory is assured. The human flith emanating from AUK isn't capable
>of mounting a challenge for longer than a couple of reply cycles.
>
>>>>>>It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking must
>>>>>>go through to create a world where they are anything but what reality
>>>>>>says they are. Yes, Dimmy, that would be you. Delusions of adequacy
>>>>>>dance in that teacup sized brain.
>>>>>
>>>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
>>>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small **** ALL THE TIME!"
>>>>>
>>>>>Please don't send me any further email. Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>"I know, I'll make up something and everyone will believe Ratz is
>>>>emailing me"
>>>>
>>>>No kook ever tried that one before.
>>>
>>>I can see why you'd think that.
>>
>>Yes, you are that stupid.
>
>PeeWee Herman wants his repertoire back.
>
>>> You do display markedly lower than
>>>average deductive reasoning and subnormally low intelligence.
>>
>> snicker
>
>I thought it was funny too. Its pretty sad you're laughing at it while
>proving it in almost every sentence.
>
>>>My comment has precipated a rather irrational comment from you to such a
>>>jovial gag. I guess I touched a nerve.
>>
>>If you are delusional, then you could make that assumption. But again,
>>you seem to lost something in your translation of English to Dimmy.
>
>I didn't actually the aim the gag that high, but it seems to have
>missed you by some distance. I'm coming to the conclusion that if I
>had to aim to hit you, it wouldn't be going skywards.
>
>>>>I obviously was being far too kind when I used pathetic.
>>
>>No response, obviously correct.
>
><guffaw>
>
>>>>>>>>Dayam, what shall I do, deary me, called a kook, by a multi-award winner.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hopefully you'll get the message that constantly making yourself a
>>>>>>>laughing stock with these tepid displays of your mediocre (f)laming
>>>>>>>talent and endeavour to dive in front of a bus, allowing spam to
>>>>>>>improve the signal to noise ratio in AF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What flaming, Dimmy?
>>>>>
>>>>>Exactly.
>>>>
>>>>Dimmy, I had to feed you the line, again. Just so I could point out you
>>>>could not tell a flame if it was a ten pound wart attached to your nose.
>>>
>>>Could you whine a little louder about setting yourself up for an easy
>>>shot? There's someone in the next solar system who hasn't heard you.
>>
>>So how is the wart these days? Do you notice it any more?
>
>Your mom is fine. She send her regards and says she'll change your
>diaper when she gets back from the two week holiday. Hopefully you
>won't have attracted that many flies and suffocated on them by then.
>
>>>>>>Sarcasm and pointing out your lack of skills in any arena could hardly
>>>>>>be called flaming. Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is
>>>>>>subbing alt.lame just makes it that much more pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>>You got something to say about alt.flame? You don't have the balls.
>>>>
>>>>So you can't read either or just begging for help?
>>>
>>>I knew you'd weasel out of making any more comments about 'alt.lame'.
>>
>>"Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is subbing alt.lame
>>just makes it that much more pathetic. "
>
>Its the SAME ****ing comment, you crainially-challenged clown. I said
>any MORE comments. You're so utterly lacking in any creative ability
>that you can't write anything new. Click your heels together three
>times, Dorothy. You're off to Oz to ask the wizard for an imagination.
>
>>>You just don't have the spine. You're so easy to manipulate. Do you
>>>see how easy it is to control a weak-minded fool like you?
>>
>>That I called alt.flame, alt.lame and declared it dead was not enough?
>>
>>No one came to your rescue, even with that pathetic mewl for help.
>>
>>Now beg for more help, Dimmy.
>
>Since you're in the mood to continue to do my bidding, how about you
>saddle on over to the fridge and get me a beer?
>
>>>>>>I suppose winning all your kook awards was somewhat disturbing, for
>>>>>>such a weak minded sot as yourself, but I am sure the train went all
>>>>>>the way off the tracks when you realized how many people consider you
>>>>>>an obsessive stalking froot loop and made you Gary's personal punch bag.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think its pretty funny.
>>>>
>>>>So do we . You froth and claim victory, you win awards, we laugh.
>>>
>>>The people handing out the 'awards' are the very same people that give
>>>you an impression of having a lower than average ability in deductive
>>>reasoning. Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people we both
>>>agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a kook and don't
>>>think highly of me? I'll just grab a second box of tissues...
>>
>>Sad.
>
>Lets see if you can make it through the next post without mentioning
>'frothing', 'laming' or 'delusional', you uncreative little twerp.
>
>>>>>You have to consider the situation.
>>>>
>>>>You obsess constantly about Gary, that would be the situation. It has
>>>>now been officially recognized. Ergo the much higher visibility from you.
>>>
>>>I do no such thing you silly little man. I read a couple of newsgroups
>>>and if the kiddie-diddling imbecile happens to pop up in those groups,
>>>I bait the idiot and watch half a dozen loons from his flea circus try
>>>to defend him. I know its not very sporting or difficult, but hey, I
>>>find it fun.
>>
>>See, you obsess about Burnore. You can't even make it through a post
>>with out some reference to Gary.
>
>We went for ten posts without mentioning Burnore in this thread, so
>your statement is incorrect. If you'd said "I can't make it through
>five posts without mentioning Burnore." that would be factually
>correct. You do realise you're the one who has constantly brought up
>his name in this thread, don't you?
>
>>>>>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright
>>>>
>>>>So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly
>>>>ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have
>>>>a basic understanding of the words you are using.
>>>
>>>I seem to have touched a nerve there. I suppose paleoanthropology is
>>>useful to you so you can identify your family and friends.
>>
>>"I touched a nerve there"
>>You probably actually believe that you did. That your lame was based
>>upon complete ignorance, well that is quite okay with you. Ignorance
>>is your watchword.
>
>It was late, I was tired, scratch one point up to you. I'm quite
>confident the multitude of points I'm beating you on are more than
>enough to see you off.
>
>>>[...]
>>
>> SNORT
>>And so begins the run and hide of Dimmy the coward. Up til now all was
>>good, then you got your tit in the wringer with a load of ignorant
>>twaddle and suddenly Dimmy needs to trim and make the bad words go
>>away. I can always count on that from you, Dimmy. What next spelling
>>lames?
>
>I'll leave those to you.
>
>"Have you picked up a dictionary, ever?"
><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>
>"Do try to keep up Mr. Illiteracy."
><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>
>"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume."
><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>
>Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
>
>>>>> Burnore can't wander into any newsgroup
>>>>>without someone slinging the 'child molester' tag at him.
>>>>
>>>>Usually due to some obsessive ****wit following him around. I'll bet
>>>>you have that whole google alerts thing set up just for Gary.
>>>
>>><rolls eyes>
>>>
>>>Having googled my profile you know I read just two newsgroups.
>>
>>Well, Mr. Ego is lose today.
>
>"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume."
><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>
><guffaw>
>
>>No, Dimmy, I didn't but this, again, is your delusion, do continue:
>
>You should. You'll find the delusion is all yours. You'll find that it
>was you who brought Burnore into the flurry of posts between us.
>
>Lets see what the dictionary says about delusion:
>
>'Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or
>confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.'
>
>If we couple this with the rampant paranoia that thinks I'm following
>people around Usenet (you can pony up some proof any time now) then
>we're beginning to see some downright kooky behaviour from you.
>
>>>How you can deduce from that obsessive behaviour I don't know.
>>
>>The fact you inject Burnore in everything.
>
>Fact: You brought Burnore into this thread, not me.
>
>>>I think you're firmly in the bracket of having a lower than average
>>>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. Some
>>>might even say your deduction is downright kooky.
>>
>>Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>>repeats and then repeats.
>
>Some things need to be repeated because you have a lower than average
>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. The
>longer this thread goes on the clearer it becomes.
>
>>>>>The sycophantic knuckle-draggers who bow down to him for their free Usenet
>>>>>posting accounts can't help but respond and wade into flame wars
>>>>>because of Burnore's indiscretion with his then step-daughter.
>>>>
>>>>Would I be one of those or are you just frothing in general about the
>>>>quantity of people on usenet, regardless of nsp, that think you a lube job?
>>>
>>>I think you can only read a post in two ways. The person is either
>>>lifeless, dull and without enthusiasm.
>>
>>Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy. You have the imagination
>>of a sea slug.
>
>'I think you can only read a post in two ways.'
>
>'Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy'
>
>There you have it. There couldn't be a more blatant Hermanism. You
>were saying something about imagination, magpie mind?
>
>>>If they don't fall into that category then they're a 'frothing loon'.
>>>Your deductive reasoning shows far more about your cognitive abilities
>>>than you realise.
>>>
>>
>>That you are an award winning frothing loon will be ignored for a
>>moment.
>>
>>Contrary to what your ego tries to tell you:
>>
>>You are a delusional half-wit that thinks spewing mindless drivelling
>>fantasies is flaming. That you then use pathetic lames like "I hit a
>>nerve", repeat yourself ad infinitum, snip and run and then display
>>the unlimited ignorance that only a truly moronic individual could
>>display is why you are seen as a kook.
>>
>>Clear enough, Dimmy.
>
>In this post I've shone a bright light on your delusions. Your first
>paranoid delusion is that you're convinced I'm following you/people
>around Usenet. The second screamingly funny delusion is that you've
>mentioned multiple times that I brought Burnore into this thread, when
>you are clearly at odds with fact. I chuckled when you mentioned
>'truly moronic' and 'kook'. I've not seen so many own goals in a
>single post for quite some time.
>
>>>>>These knuckle-draggers have been easy pickings for quite some time and I've
>>>>>hammered plenty of them into the ground like tent pegs.
>>>>
>>>>And the delusions of adequacy return.
>>>
>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small **** ALL THE TIME!"
>>>
>>>I told you to stop sending me email.
>>>
>>>[Cue: "Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!! I'm not sending you email. Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!!]
>>
>>Like no other kook has ever tried that.
>
>"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>repeats and then repeats."
>
><guffaw>
>
>>Cue standard Dimmy Delusion:
>>"I hit a nerve"
>
>Ahh, the old delusion line again.
>
>"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>repeats and then repeats."
>
>Did you have to practice to score own goals like this or did it come
>naturally?
>
>>>>You do remember Bill Cleere and I discussing his spending quality time
>>>>with his grand son and you jumping in and whining about Burnore?
>>>
>>>No, I'm sure it left a big impression on you and you're going to tell
>>>me all about it. You dull twat.
>>
>>That was pretty ugly for you, I can see why you blanked it.
>
>I really don't remember it. Perhaps you could give me a little
>refresher given that you are so proud of your exploits?
>
>>>[...] "Yer a kook, yada, yada, yada."
>>>
>>>Colour me unimpressed.
>>
>>More like unimpressive:
>>:>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright
>>:
>>:So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly
>>:ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have
>>:a basic understanding of the words you are using.
>>:
>>:
>>:>and who are much more at
>>:>home in the trees scoffing bananas tell me I'm a kook because I enjoy
>>:>baiting the Burnore clan.
>>:
>>:<Mr. helpful mode>
>>immy, the Neanderthals were not tree living, they were omnivorous and
>>:they walked upright much as homo sapiens.
>>:
>>immy, would you like to try that with an earlier member of the genus
>>:homo? It then would have possibly worked. But you would have been
>>:better off with a monkey or chimp reference. Displaying your
>>:ignorance, Dimmy, does seem to cause your lames to lose any possible
>>:impact.
>>:</Mr. Helpful mode>
>>
>>Now that was funny stuff, I get to educate you on basic flaming and
>>basic antropology, you get the whole hoist on the petard effect and I
>>get to laugh at you for snipping and running.
>
>You won a small point. I'm impressed. Lets see how you handle this
>post. Remember to answer everything and no snipping and running.
>
>Shall I write the spank claim now?

Its confirmed, Aratzio is a spankard.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK gentic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> posted:
>>>>>>Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Sharon B <sharon@lart.com> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>Kevin is busy working out which toe goes where after yet another
>>hilariously funny Usenet gaffe. Maybe Sharon will drop by. If her
>>paranoia is so bad its causing her to see me following her all over
>>Usenet again, then she will need to find her tinfoil hat. It looks
>>like you're left with MP, so effectively you're on your own.
>
><Dimmy tries to change subject>

You're too busy snipping we can't have a decent conversation. Tell you
what, sport, I'll jot down a few topics and we can stuck in. What do
you say about that, Kirsty?

Why do you count to thirteen when you count your toes? Are you some
kind of genetic freak?

What makes you think I follow people all over Usenet? Are you another
paranoid cretin from AUK?

What makes you think your fellow AUK denizens "display markedly lower
than average deductive reasoning"? Are they really that thick an
ignorant clod like you looks down on them?

Why is you claim I can't go through a post without making a reference
to Burnore when in this thread where we discussed this, you hightailed
it outta that after I pointed out it was you who brought up the
subject of Usenet's best known child molester?

Why do you make half-arsed comments about spelling lames while posting
(wait for it) spelling lames? Are you another screaming AUK hypocrite?

Your final comment from that 517 line post was hilarious:

"I get to laugh at you for snipping and running."
<8dt2g3dnip6nsuf0ar0ng6ah7t2un9pe2g@4ax.com>

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Now I'm laughing at you, Penelope.

Keep snipping and keep running.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK genetic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
[...]
><BLAM>
>6 toes down, 7 to go.

I'd long suspected you weren't from the US, but this edges me towards
thinking you were conceived in the town of Pripyat during April 1986.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK genetic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>[...]
>>>>Now continue to snip and run like the gutless weasel you are.
>>>
>>>How did your poll turn out for you? Maybe the lurkers emailed you
>>>support.
>>
>>Well done. Keep obeying my commands, Miranda.
>
>Wow, another "made you post" claim.

I've followed up one of your other posts and decided we should discuss
the salient points from that 517 line post you've been dodging.

I command you to snip and run from it, Shirley.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK genetic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>