Timmay is literally Burnore's bitch.

[Timmay!]

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>>>Been to the emergency room yet?
>>>
>>><Dimmy not realizing where an emergency room would be located declares
>>>his ignorance>
>>
>>They would be located on the continent of the United States because we
>>don't have 'Emergency Rooms' in the UK, you geographically ignorant
>>clod. The only reason I would come to the US is to belittle imbeciles
>>face to face. They're easy to spot across here. The standard American
>>casual attire is something akin to a Golf Tournament for the colour
>>blind. I'd probably have to wear sunglasses to look at them in their
>>native habitat.
>
><dimmy whining>

That was a flame, Yvette. AUK drones aren't capable of answering them
with fire. They normally snip and run, post a non-sequitur or drool.

>So Dimmy why would you imagine an Emergency room anywhere other than a
>hospital?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_department

"United States

A smaller facility that may provide assistance in medical emergencies
is known as a clinic."

Why is it that Americans are so stupid they have to educated about
their own country by people who've only visited occassionally. How is
life in Hicksville, Helen?

>>>>We call them 'hospitals' here, but thank you for your concern.
>>>
>>>How many stitches? Was it a through and through or did they did the
>>>bullet out?
>>
>><watches tumbleweed roll through this part of the post>
>
>Yeah, that famous Dimmy wit , I bet you were giggling like a little
>school girl, when you saw a typo.

Your replies were so tepid and lifeless I came to the conclusion that
writing screeds of text to show you how stupid you you are would be
pointless. Much more efficient to post that.

[...] (Much "I WIN!!!!" whining.)

I did win. Thanks for the easy spank, Abigail.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK genetic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Suzieflame <suzieflame@yachtmail.com> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
[...]
>>I look down the entirety of this thread and I don't see any thought
>>from you at all. Its just a monotonous pile of recycled drivel. Your
>>entire Usenet posting history is replete with such gems. You seem to
>>be content with trying to match what has been posted.
>
>If I could match your talent in these matters, the world would be a
>much shittier place. Hence, I don't stoop to conquer.

You're just slumming it for a few rounds, eh? Same old Snoozie. You
poke your face in alt.flame, shuffle around in your size twelve high
heels, turning sharply to waft the hem of your ill-fitting dress up,
occasionally glancing in your mirror to see if your beard growth is
noticable, dreaming of what it'd be like to be comfortable with your
own body. So what are you? Post-op transsexual? Pre-op? Hermaphrodite?

>>I'm probably guilty of that too, but I thought you'd picked up the
>>thread because you something new to say. Clearly not. You're just an
>>echo from 1999.
>
>It is tragically funny to watch you in self-denial about being
>arse-kicked across Usenet for about 1/4 of your life.

So you haven't got anything new to say. Fair enough.

--
Timmay!

"I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's
No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in
<77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

 

[Timmay!]

The 2-Belo <the2belo@msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>Timmay! totally sneezed all over alt.flame with a withering cloud of snot:
[...]
>>You're ashamed of being short, aren't you
>
>Rather, you are ashamed that for the past nine ****ing years you have never been
>able to come up with anything more interesting than this dead horse.

I only brought up your height during the last year since you returned
to claim the keyboard I ripped from your cold, dead hands. Lets not
let facts get in the way of a good rant, eh? BTW, I pissed on your
keyboard. That's why it was warm when I gave you it back.

[...] (WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not short. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm nearly five foot'' WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
And I'm proud of it. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
So you can **** right off. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!)

> readies killfile

Oh no, not the dreaded killfile I've been plonked for life in a dozen
times already. Anything but that! <laugh>

>And... begin.

See ya round, Dildo Sackins.

--
Timmay!

Kook of the Month May 1999
Golden Killfile Sept 1999
Looney Maroon Dec 1998
Looney Maroon Feb 1999
Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999
Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000
George Pickett Sept 2000
George Pickett Oct 2000
Busted Urinal Award
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Tar & Feathers Award
Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades

 

[Timmay!]

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Dimmy wanted to prove he spanked someone.
>>>>
>>>>The proof of your spank is in that 517 line post. It destroyed you and
>>>>you fled. I really don't blame you for running away from it. You dug
>>>>yourself into a hole and there didn't appear to be any way for you to
>>>>extricate yourself from it without everyone laughing at you.
>>>>
>>>>I 'started' the poll because I wanted to see how many other spankards
>>>>you could muster up to help you out in this difficult time.
>>>
>>><snip standard "I WIN!">
>>
>>I can see why you snipped that, you gutless coward.
>
>Yeah, boredom from reading you bloviate the same dreck.

Well I'm bored too. Bored of watching whine "delusional". Bored to
watching you snip and run. Bored of watching you whine "frothing" when
you get flamed. Bored of watching you whine "repetitive" while posting
"delusional" and "frothing" over and over and over again.

[...] (Drek.)

>>>That was just a sad, you beg for help from af twice and only Bumble
>>>poked his head up that one time.
>>
>>Campbell's jealousy is not surprising. Seeing you getting booted
>>around alt.flame by me makes his green eyes burn very bright.
>
>So you admit you were begging for help.

This is precisely the type of behaviour I mean when I pointed out that
AUK denizens display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning.

Where did I admit anything you pig-ignorant lump of ****?

>Sort of makes all those nice delusions of yours, moot. Maybe if you
>could put them on Mute you could get over having to beg for help.

The day I need help with you is the day I retire from alt.flame.

--
Timmay!

"6 toes down, 7 to go." Aratzio, AUK genetic freak counts his toes in
<aq0og3hrqc4a93pb7ak91invc6vv8tktic@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Sharon B <sharon@lart.com> wrote:

>I'm not a big talker.

No, you're a paranoid, lying, seeker of victimhood who imagines people
following her from newsgroup to newsgroup.

--
Timmay!

"You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you
claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton
imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
>>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>>>>Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>[...]
>>>>>>>When shall I throw in the towel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you're only wearing that over your disgusting fat body, never.
>>>>>
>>>>>Fat flames in a textual medium where nobody sees anybody.
>>>>>Whoa...witness the flaming greatness the Thorninator!
>>>>
>>>>"STFU Fat Boi."
>>>><f7eg1v$64p$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>>>>
>>>>There must be a pile of rotting toes under your desk by now.
>>>
>>>It's nice to know you'll google dive in a moment.
>>
>>One minute spent conclusively proving you're a screaming hypocrite is
>>time well spent. If I had a bit more spare time I'd hop off to Google
>>and prove again you're a screaming hypocrite by Google diving. Even
>>when I've just made made you a laughing stock you're begging for it to
>>be reaffirmed in the next post. Why do you do this to yourself? Do you
>>enjoy being made to look stupid?
>
>Tim Thorne is well know as a screaming hypocritical racist ****.

Kevin A. Cannon is a well known alt.flame punching bag who'll stoop to
anything when he feels the toe of my boot up his arse and spends his
spare time being a screaming hypocrite.

>>>And while you may have a point, and I love the way you part your hair
>>>around it, Chaney is well known as a fat slovenly cretin and there is
>>>documented proof of such readily available.
>>
>>"Fat flames in a textual medium where nobody sees anybody.
>>Whoa...witness the flaming greatness the Thorninator!"
>>Some hypocrite in <fe1e6j$opt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>
>If I could be bothered to google dive like you I would find quite a
>few instances of your "well known" shitheel hypocrisy.

If you had any semblance of a memory you'd realise you did the same
thing six months ago, whined about being caught out then and proceeded
to whine about Google diving then.

>>>You...On the other hand....continue to use appearance based flames
>>>when you've been backed into a corner and have no other recourse.
>>
>>So what if I use them? I'm not the one decrying the use of them, using
>>them, then vilifying them, then popping another one out, then
>>castigating the use of them ad infinitum. You're not getting the
>>message. This is about you being a screaming hypocrite.
>
>You have the time line wrong you dolt.

No I don't. I know precisely what you've said before and I know
precisely how I kicked your arse about it last time.

>I used them...but not in the lame way you are using them.

So, the following quote isn't at all lame?

"STFU Fat Boi."
<f7eg1v$64p$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>

--
Timmay!

Kook of the Month May 1999
Golden Killfile Sept 1999
Looney Maroon Dec 1998
Looney Maroon Feb 1999
Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999
Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000
George Pickett Sept 2000
George Pickett Oct 2000
Busted Urinal Award
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Tar & Feathers Award
Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades

 

[Timmay!]

K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
[...]
>>>>You're ashamed of being short, aren't you?
>>>
>>>Yep...it's easy to tell how tall or short you are on UseNet.
>>
>>"STFU Fat Boi."
>><f7eg1v$64p$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>
>A thorne-ism:
>
>Repetition is the soul of flaming and originality should be ignored.

I've never seen anyone whine so loudly about making themselves an easy
target before. Your problem is that you're congenitally stupid. If you
were smarter you wouldn't make these errors and I wouldn't be able to
make you look like a screaming hypocrite in a few lines without having
to type anything.

I see you've dropped the Burton/Stalker thread again. Why did you pick
it up in the first place? You must know you're on a hiding to nothing
trying to prove anything remotely plausible. Why do you defend the
paranoid liar anyway? Is she your special pen friend? <laugh>

--
Timmay!

Kook of the Month May 1999
Golden Killfile Sept 1999
Looney Maroon Dec 1998
Looney Maroon Feb 1999
Palmjob Paddle Nov 1999
Palmjob Paddle Oct 2000
George Pickett Sept 2000
George Pickett Oct 2000
Busted Urinal Award
George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
Tar & Feathers Award
Kook Kard Deck, Three of Spades

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:45 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> posted:
>>>>>>>Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Sharon B <sharon@lart.com> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>Kevin is busy working out which toe goes where after yet another
>>>hilariously funny Usenet gaffe. Maybe Sharon will drop by. If her
>>>paranoia is so bad its causing her to see me following her all over
>>>Usenet again, then she will need to find her tinfoil hat. It looks
>>>like you're left with MP, so effectively you're on your own.
>>
>><Dimmy tries to change subject>

Lil wanker Dimmy, 7 days and not even a lurker.

Sad how you will have to spend the rest of your usenet time knowing
that not even one of your fellow kooks thought enough of your repetive
lamery to agree with you.

Squat
Zip
Nada

Seven ****ing Days

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:56 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>[...]
>><BLAM>
>>6 toes down, 7 to go.

<dimmy failing again>

Whiner.

 

[Flying Fuck]

Timmay! wrote:

> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>Timmay! wrote:
>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>That's what I thought.
>>>
>>>So why do you constantly repeat the irony meter line? Do you want to
>>>give the impression of a mentally incompetent fool? Or is it because
>>>you've got a short memory and that's all that pops into your head?
>>
>>WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>>LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>>IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!
>
> The irony of you snipping a comment about irony meters only to reply
> with yet another irony meter line is completely lost on you, isn't it?
>

i was tipped off by my REAL "irony meter". :]

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3OZTcNACSY
         .-------.
       .'.-'''''-.'._
      //`         `\\\
     ;;             ;;'.__.===============,
     ||      . <-   ||  __                 )
     ;:    your     ;;.'  '==============='
      \\   penus   ///
       ':...___...:'~
         `'-----'`

"The fact that you're being increasing annoying..." - QuackfArt

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:15:05 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>[...]
>>>>>Now continue to snip and run like the gutless weasel you are.
>>>>
>>>>How did your poll turn out for you? Maybe the lurkers emailed you
>>>>support.
>>>
>>>Well done. Keep obeying my commands, Miranda.
>>
>>Wow, another "made you post" claim.
>
>I've followed up one of your other posts and decided we should discuss
>the salient points from that 517 line post you've been dodging.

7 days and you still can't accept your complete and utter failure.
Begging for help and no one came to your aid.

>
>I command you to snip and run from it, Shirley.

Awww, Dimmy, how, err, weak.

I command you not to blow the whole Scottish Blackwatch.

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:15:11 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>[...]
>>>>>>Been to the emergency room yet?
>>>>
>>>><Dimmy not realizing where an emergency room would be located declares
>>>>his ignorance>
>>>
>>>They would be located on the continent of the United States because we
>>>don't have 'Emergency Rooms' in the UK, you geographically ignorant
>>>clod. The only reason I would come to the US is to belittle imbeciles
>>>face to face. They're easy to spot across here. The standard American
>>>casual attire is something akin to a Golf Tournament for the colour
>>>blind. I'd probably have to wear sunglasses to look at them in their
>>>native habitat.
>>
>><dimmy whining>
>
>That was a flame, Yvette

"Dimmy, I am a flame gawd"

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:16:05 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Dimmy wanted to prove he spanked someone.
>>>>>
>>>>>The proof of your spank is in that 517 line post. It destroyed you and
>>>>>you fled. I really don't blame you for running away from it. You dug
>>>>>yourself into a hole and there didn't appear to be any way for you to
>>>>>extricate yourself from it without everyone laughing at you.
>>>>>
>>>>>I 'started' the poll because I wanted to see how many other spankards
>>>>>you could muster up to help you out in this difficult time.
>>>>
>>>><snip standard "I WIN!">
>>>
>>>I can see why you snipped that, you gutless coward.
>>
>>Yeah, boredom from reading you bloviate the same dreck.
>
>Well I'm bored too. Bored of watching whine "delusional".

Too bad, Dimmy. The truth about you says otherwise.

You have deluded yourself into believing that regurgitating the same
lames is the epitome of flaming.

You have deluded yourslef that a whine for help would be answered and
you would be vindicated as a flamer.

You have deluded yourself that your writings are anything but shear
moronic drivel placed upon usenet so that you might be used as a
kickball.

You have deluded yourself that you are not a stalking ****wit.

You have deluded yourself that you can actually think.

Yes, Dimmy, you are as delusional as they come with an ego that just
keeps making you come back for more.

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:16:16 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>Kevin A. Cannon is a well known alt.flame punching bag who'll stoop to
>anything when he feels the toe of my boot up his arse and spends his
>spare time being a screaming hypocrite.
>

"I WIN!"

Like I said, same ole ****, every post, you delusional halfwit.

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:16:20 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Timmay!
<timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:

>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> posted:
>[...]
>>>>>You're ashamed of being short, aren't you?
>>>>
>>>>Yep...it's easy to tell how tall or short you are on UseNet.
>>>
>>>"STFU Fat Boi."
>>><f7eg1v$64p$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>>
>>A thorne-ism:
>>
>>Repetition is the soul of flaming and originality should be ignored.
>
>I've never seen anyone whine so loudly about making themselves an easy
>target before.

I suggest a tape recorder.

 

[Meat Plow]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:16:16 +0100, Timmay! wrote:

< snip>

> Kevin A. Cannon is a well known alt.flame punching bag

Well known by who?

 

[Meat Plow]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:45 +0100, Timmay! wrote:

> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> bloviated:
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>K. A. Cannon <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> posted:
>>>>>>>Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Sharon B <sharon@lart.com> bloviated:
>>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>Kevin is busy working out which toe goes where after yet another
>>>hilariously funny Usenet gaffe. Maybe Sharon will drop by. If her
>>>paranoia is so bad its causing her to see me following her all over
>>>Usenet again, then she will need to find her tinfoil hat. It looks
>>>like you're left with MP, so effectively you're on your own.
>>
>><Dimmy tries to change subject>
>
> You're too busy snipping

What's the word I'm looking for to describe this group of 4 words?

 

[Meat Plow]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:07 +0100, Timmay! wrote:

> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>Timmay! wrote:
>>> Meat Plow <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>That's what I thought.
>>>
>>>So why do you constantly repeat the irony meter line? Do you want to
>>>give the impression of a mentally incompetent fool? Or is it because
>>>you've got a short memory and that's all that pops into your head?
>>
>>WARNING! EXTREME LEVELS OF IRONY DETECTED! DO NOT TOUCH YOUR ALCOTROLL
>>LABS TURBO IRONY METER WHILE IT PROCESSES THIS ATOMIC BLAST OF TIMMAY!
>>IRONY! SEVER BURNS MAY RESULT!
>
> The irony

The irony of your posts hold no match in the history of all Usenet.

 

[Meat Plow]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:22 +0100, Timmay! wrote:

> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>>>>>Still only one stupid kook in sight. This has to be a first.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Wow, my credibility just took a hit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You never had any in the first place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Not like you could think of a line with out me feeding you with sarcasm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you wanna wear a big sign that screams 'kick me', its best not to
>>>>>>whine about being kicked, unless you enjoy whining? <--------------------------- Short yellow bus riders read here
>>>>>
>>>>>Where's the whining, moron? Specifically point out the term or phrase
>>>>>you believe to be a whine. Just want to be able to pinpoint where in
>>>>>your education the teachers went wrong. My current theory is they
>>>>>actually felt you were educable.
>>>>
>>>>There has been a mysterious pattern to my posts for the past decade.
>>>
>>>Stupidity, lameness and complete lack of humor.
>>
>>You asked for directions to your whining, you whining witless wonder.
>>You were given directions for your whining. Now you're whining about
>>being given directions to your whining. Can't you do anything but
>>whine? Its tediously ****ing boring. Do you realise how dull it is to
>>plod through your posts, kicking your lazy, unimaginative arse all
>>over alt.flame? Its so one-sided it isn't funny.
>>
>>>>Someone makes a comment, I follow it with another comment. Generally
>>>>the two comments have a theme and can be thought of as part of the
>>>>same 'conversation'. I think I've given you too much of a clue. Do you
>>>>require more help pinpointing it? If so, please board the short yellow
>>>>bus and wipe the drool from your chin when you board.
>>>
>>>Translation: Puke up any ole delusional gibberish and call it a (f)lame.
>>
>>All aboard the short yellow bus. Next stop, basic english
>>comprehension for unimaginitive cretins, where you'll be getting off.
>>
>>>>>>>You are pathetic. It is like when everyone gets bored with these
>>>>>>>monotonic lames you claim to be flames and walks away shaking their
>>>>>>>head, you then prance and preen claiming your victory once more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is hardly difficult to outwit someone posting from AUK.
>>>>>
>>>>>I am, wow, this sure looks like aav3f. But this is your fantasy, do continue.
>>>>
>>>>It might be crossposted there, but you subscribe to and read AUK.
>>>
>>>Really? How can you be sure? Oh, that's right, you follow people
>>>around usenet.
>>
>>Sharon said the same thing and she got spanked over it. Every time she
>>plucks up the courage to post to alt.flame, she finds me there to punt
>>her back into oblivion. Being the generous person I am I'm going to
>>allow you to drop it and never mention it again. This is a one time
>>offer. So what's it to be? Do I follow people around Usenet or are you
>>a paranoid pillock who wants to spend some Usenet time being my bitch?
>>
>>>>You'd be reading this from AUK if I cut aav3f. Of course you could
>>>>still deny that you read AUK, but we both know that would be futile.
>>>
>>>But you didn't did you. Funny you make a lot of delusional claims but
>>>you never can quite back them up.
>>
>>I've got no need to back anything up because you've not stated
>>anything that needed refuting. Now, if you were to state that you
>>didn't read AUK, which you've been extremely hesitant to say, then I
>>might have to wade in and prove you to be a liar. Roll the dice and
>>make your choice.
>>
>>>>>>They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning,
>>>>>
>>>>>I can see where you could get that impression.
>>>>
>>>>That's not a very nice thing to say about your fellow AUK'ers. Do they
>>>>know you hold them in such a low esteem?
>>
>>Hmmmm. No response, obviously correct.
>>
>><guffaw>
>>
>>>>>The problem is that you write it, people point and laugh at you, you
>>>>>then post more delusional screed. Not like it requires AC Doyle to
>>>>>deduce you are a half-wit.
>>>>
>>>>The people doing the pointing and laughing are the very same people
>>>>that give you an impression of having a lower than average ability in
>>>>deductive reasoning.
>>>
>>>Ah, the context snip with the follow-up based upon the changed
>>>context. How cute, useless bute cute. I am sure self styled flamers
>>>enjoy being characterized as cute.
>>>
>>>Which explains why deductive reasoning is not required for your posts,
>>>half-wit.
>>
>>There was no context snip, you utterly confused spastic.
>>
>>Here I make a remark about AUK'ers:
>>
>>>"They usually display markedly lower than average deductive reasoning,"
>>
>>You snip my sentence and reply with:
>>
>>>"I can see where you could get that impression."
>>
>>There is nothing unambiguous about your reply. Its not cut. Its not
>>taken out of context. It cannot be interpreted any other way. If you
>>meant to say something different, you did a ****ing poor job of it. If
>>you can't express yourself properly then unplug your keyboard and get
>>the **** out of here. You clearly don't belong.
>>
>>>>Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people
>>>>we both agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a few names
>>>>and don't think highly of me? I'll just grab that box of tissues...
>>>
>>>Well, you have been quite regular in your spewing to usenet, ever
>>>since you were named "Burnore's Bitch". So yeah, evidence does support
>>>that conclusion.
>>
>>There is no evidence of anything except your craziness, kook. You're
>>reaching the bottom of the barrel and have even taken to claiming I'm
>>following people around Usenet. Don't you realise how completely
>>laughable your statement is? You're completely kooking out.
>>
>>>>>>subnormally low intelligence, virtually no creativity and they can't
>>>>>>quite grasp the point that they are inferior creatures to the rest of
>>>>>>the population. Victory is assured before I post.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing like demonstrating that I am right.
>>>>>Did you do that whole "staying alive" bit?
>>>>
>>>>Forgive me for not knowing what the **** you're babbling about when
>>>>you make an obscure reference to some 70s film.
>>>
>>>Not like it is hard to get one by you, eh, Dimmy.
>>>
>>>Hint: You claimed victory", right on schedule. Which given your
>>>preening egoist nature would require a victory dance . Travolta would
>>>seem right up your alley.
>>
>>Victory is assured. The human flith emanating from AUK isn't capable
>>of mounting a challenge for longer than a couple of reply cycles.
>>
>>>>>>>It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking must
>>>>>>>go through to create a world where they are anything but what reality
>>>>>>>says they are. Yes, Dimmy, that would be you. Delusions of adequacy
>>>>>>>dance in that teacup sized brain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
>>>>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small **** ALL THE TIME!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please don't send me any further email. Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>"I know, I'll make up something and everyone will believe Ratz is
>>>>>emailing me"
>>>>>
>>>>>No kook ever tried that one before.
>>>>
>>>>I can see why you'd think that.
>>>
>>>Yes, you are that stupid.
>>
>>PeeWee Herman wants his repertoire back.
>>
>>>> You do display markedly lower than
>>>>average deductive reasoning and subnormally low intelligence.
>>>
>>> snicker
>>
>>I thought it was funny too. Its pretty sad you're laughing at it while
>>proving it in almost every sentence.
>>
>>>>My comment has precipated a rather irrational comment from you to such a
>>>>jovial gag. I guess I touched a nerve.
>>>
>>>If you are delusional, then you could make that assumption. But again,
>>>you seem to lost something in your translation of English to Dimmy.
>>
>>I didn't actually the aim the gag that high, but it seems to have
>>missed you by some distance. I'm coming to the conclusion that if I
>>had to aim to hit you, it wouldn't be going skywards.
>>
>>>>>I obviously was being far too kind when I used pathetic.
>>>
>>>No response, obviously correct.
>>
>><guffaw>
>>
>>>>>>>>>Dayam, what shall I do, deary me, called a kook, by a multi-award winner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hopefully you'll get the message that constantly making yourself a
>>>>>>>>laughing stock with these tepid displays of your mediocre (f)laming
>>>>>>>>talent and endeavour to dive in front of a bus, allowing spam to
>>>>>>>>improve the signal to noise ratio in AF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What flaming, Dimmy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Exactly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dimmy, I had to feed you the line, again. Just so I could point out you
>>>>>could not tell a flame if it was a ten pound wart attached to your nose.
>>>>
>>>>Could you whine a little louder about setting yourself up for an easy
>>>>shot? There's someone in the next solar system who hasn't heard you.
>>>
>>>So how is the wart these days? Do you notice it any more?
>>
>>Your mom is fine. She send her regards and says she'll change your
>>diaper when she gets back from the two week holiday. Hopefully you
>>won't have attracted that many flies and suffocated on them by then.
>>
>>>>>>>Sarcasm and pointing out your lack of skills in any arena could hardly
>>>>>>>be called flaming. Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is
>>>>>>>subbing alt.lame just makes it that much more pathetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You got something to say about alt.flame? You don't have the balls.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you can't read either or just begging for help?
>>>>
>>>>I knew you'd weasel out of making any more comments about 'alt.lame'.
>>>
>>>"Toss in that a moron like you imagines anyone is subbing alt.lame
>>>just makes it that much more pathetic. "
>>
>>Its the SAME ****ing comment, you crainially-challenged clown. I said
>>any MORE comments. You're so utterly lacking in any creative ability
>>that you can't write anything new. Click your heels together three
>>times, Dorothy. You're off to Oz to ask the wizard for an imagination.
>>
>>>>You just don't have the spine. You're so easy to manipulate. Do you
>>>>see how easy it is to control a weak-minded fool like you?
>>>
>>>That I called alt.flame, alt.lame and declared it dead was not enough?
>>>
>>>No one came to your rescue, even with that pathetic mewl for help.
>>>
>>>Now beg for more help, Dimmy.
>>
>>Since you're in the mood to continue to do my bidding, how about you
>>saddle on over to the fridge and get me a beer?
>>
>>>>>>>I suppose winning all your kook awards was somewhat disturbing, for
>>>>>>>such a weak minded sot as yourself, but I am sure the train went all
>>>>>>>the way off the tracks when you realized how many people consider you
>>>>>>>an obsessive stalking froot loop and made you Gary's personal punch bag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think its pretty funny.
>>>>>
>>>>>So do we . You froth and claim victory, you win awards, we laugh.
>>>>
>>>>The people handing out the 'awards' are the very same people that give
>>>>you an impression of having a lower than average ability in deductive
>>>>reasoning. Am I supposed to be upset that a bunch of people we both
>>>>agree to have markedly low intelligence called me a kook and don't
>>>>think highly of me? I'll just grab a second box of tissues...
>>>
>>>Sad.
>>
>>Lets see if you can make it through the next post without mentioning
>>'frothing', 'laming' or 'delusional', you uncreative little twerp.
>>
>>>>>>You have to consider the situation.
>>>>>
>>>>>You obsess constantly about Gary, that would be the situation. It has
>>>>>now been officially recognized. Ergo the much higher visibility from you.
>>>>
>>>>I do no such thing you silly little man. I read a couple of newsgroups
>>>>and if the kiddie-diddling imbecile happens to pop up in those groups,
>>>>I bait the idiot and watch half a dozen loons from his flea circus try
>>>>to defend him. I know its not very sporting or difficult, but hey, I
>>>>find it fun.
>>>
>>>See, you obsess about Burnore. You can't even make it through a post
>>>with out some reference to Gary.
>>
>>We went for ten posts without mentioning Burnore in this thread, so
>>your statement is incorrect. If you'd said "I can't make it through
>>five posts without mentioning Burnore." that would be factually
>>correct. You do realise you're the one who has constantly brought up
>>his name in this thread, don't you?
>>
>>>>>>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright
>>>>>
>>>>>So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly
>>>>>ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have
>>>>>a basic understanding of the words you are using.
>>>>
>>>>I seem to have touched a nerve there. I suppose paleoanthropology is
>>>>useful to you so you can identify your family and friends.
>>>
>>>"I touched a nerve there"
>>>You probably actually believe that you did. That your lame was based
>>>upon complete ignorance, well that is quite okay with you. Ignorance
>>>is your watchword.
>>
>>It was late, I was tired, scratch one point up to you. I'm quite
>>confident the multitude of points I'm beating you on are more than
>>enough to see you off.
>>
>>>>[...]
>>>
>>> SNORT
>>>And so begins the run and hide of Dimmy the coward. Up til now all was
>>>good, then you got your tit in the wringer with a load of ignorant
>>>twaddle and suddenly Dimmy needs to trim and make the bad words go
>>>away. I can always count on that from you, Dimmy. What next spelling
>>>lames?
>>
>>I'll leave those to you.
>>
>>"Have you picked up a dictionary, ever?"
>><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>>
>>"Do try to keep up Mr. Illiteracy."
>><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>>
>>"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume."
>><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>>
>>Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
>>
>>>>>> Burnore can't wander into any newsgroup
>>>>>>without someone slinging the 'child molester' tag at him.
>>>>>
>>>>>Usually due to some obsessive ****wit following him around. I'll bet
>>>>>you have that whole google alerts thing set up just for Gary.
>>>>
>>>><rolls eyes>
>>>>
>>>>Having googled my profile you know I read just two newsgroups.
>>>
>>>Well, Mr. Ego is lose today.
>>
>>"Literacy is not something you can put on a resume."
>><evnne1ls4voub9bq0b0o7ei2e14ddo41cf@4ax.com>
>>
>><guffaw>
>>
>>>No, Dimmy, I didn't but this, again, is your delusion, do continue:
>>
>>You should. You'll find the delusion is all yours. You'll find that it
>>was you who brought Burnore into the flurry of posts between us.
>>
>>Lets see what the dictionary says about delusion:
>>
>>'Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or
>>confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.'
>>
>>If we couple this with the rampant paranoia that thinks I'm following
>>people around Usenet (you can pony up some proof any time now) then
>>we're beginning to see some downright kooky behaviour from you.
>>
>>>>How you can deduce from that obsessive behaviour I don't know.
>>>
>>>The fact you inject Burnore in everything.
>>
>>Fact: You brought Burnore into this thread, not me.
>>
>>>>I think you're firmly in the bracket of having a lower than average
>>>>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. Some
>>>>might even say your deduction is downright kooky.
>>>
>>>Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>>>repeats and then repeats.
>>
>>Some things need to be repeated because you have a lower than average
>>ability in deductive reasoning and markedly low intelligence. The
>>longer this thread goes on the clearer it becomes.
>>
>>>>>>The sycophantic knuckle-draggers who bow down to him for their free Usenet
>>>>>>posting accounts can't help but respond and wade into flame wars
>>>>>>because of Burnore's indiscretion with his then step-daughter.
>>>>>
>>>>>Would I be one of those or are you just frothing in general about the
>>>>>quantity of people on usenet, regardless of nsp, that think you a lube job?
>>>>
>>>>I think you can only read a post in two ways. The person is either
>>>>lifeless, dull and without enthusiasm.
>>>
>>>Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy. You have the imagination
>>>of a sea slug.
>>
>>'I think you can only read a post in two ways.'
>>
>>'Of course you can only see two ways, Dimmy'
>>
>>There you have it. There couldn't be a more blatant Hermanism. You
>>were saying something about imagination, magpie mind?
>>
>>>>If they don't fall into that category then they're a 'frothing loon'.
>>>>Your deductive reasoning shows far more about your cognitive abilities
>>>>than you realise.
>>>>
>>>
>>>That you are an award winning frothing loon will be ignored for a
>>>moment.
>>>
>>>Contrary to what your ego tries to tell you:
>>>
>>>You are a delusional half-wit that thinks spewing mindless drivelling
>>>fantasies is flaming. That you then use pathetic lames like "I hit a
>>>nerve", repeat yourself ad infinitum, snip and run and then display
>>>the unlimited ignorance that only a truly moronic individual could
>>>display is why you are seen as a kook.
>>>
>>>Clear enough, Dimmy.
>>
>>In this post I've shone a bright light on your delusions. Your first
>>paranoid delusion is that you're convinced I'm following you/people
>>around Usenet. The second screamingly funny delusion is that you've
>>mentioned multiple times that I brought Burnore into this thread, when
>>you are clearly at odds with fact. I chuckled when you mentioned
>>'truly moronic' and 'kook'. I've not seen so many own goals in a
>>single post for quite some time.
>>
>>>>>>These knuckle-draggers have been easy pickings for quite some time and I've
>>>>>>hammered plenty of them into the ground like tent pegs.
>>>>>
>>>>>And the delusions of adequacy return.
>>>>
>>>>"From: a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
>>>>Subject: My wife complains about my small **** ALL THE TIME!"
>>>>
>>>>I told you to stop sending me email.
>>>>
>>>>[Cue: "Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!! I'm not sending you email. Waaaaaaahhhhhh!!!]
>>>
>>>Like no other kook has ever tried that.
>>
>>"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>>repeats and then repeats."
>>
>><guffaw>
>>
>>>Cue standard Dimmy Delusion:
>>>"I hit a nerve"
>>
>>Ahh, the old delusion line again.
>>
>>"Ah, Dimmy, so in love love with his own words, he just repeats,
>>repeats and then repeats."
>>
>>Did you have to practice to score own goals like this or did it come
>>naturally?
>>
>>>>>You do remember Bill Cleere and I discussing his spending quality time
>>>>>with his grand son and you jumping in and whining about Burnore?
>>>>
>>>>No, I'm sure it left a big impression on you and you're going to tell
>>>>me all about it. You dull twat.
>>>
>>>That was pretty ugly for you, I can see why you blanked it.
>>
>>I really don't remember it. Perhaps you could give me a little
>>refresher given that you are so proud of your exploits?
>>
>>>>[...] "Yer a kook, yada, yada, yada."
>>>>
>>>>Colour me unimpressed.
>>>
>>>More like unimpressive:
>>>:>A bunch of neanderthals who've yet to walk upright
>>>:
>>>:So I can add Paleoanthropology to the list of which you are wholly
>>>:ignorant. If you are going to lame people, Dimmy, at least try to have
>>>:a basic understanding of the words you are using.
>>>:
>>>:
>>>:>and who are much more at
>>>:>home in the trees scoffing bananas tell me I'm a kook because I enjoy
>>>:>baiting the Burnore clan.
>>>:
>>>:<Mr. helpful mode>
>>>immy, the Neanderthals were not tree living, they were omnivorous and
>>>:they walked upright much as homo sapiens.
>>>:
>>>immy, would you like to try that with an earlier member of the genus
>>>:homo? It then would have possibly worked. But you would have been
>>>:better off with a monkey or chimp reference. Displaying your
>>>:ignorance, Dimmy, does seem to cause your lames to lose any possible
>>>:impact.
>>>:</Mr. Helpful mode>
>>>
>>>Now that was funny stuff, I get to educate you on basic flaming and
>>>basic antropology, you get the whole hoist on the petard effect and I
>>>get to laugh at you for snipping and running.
>>
>>You won a small point. I'm impressed. Lets see how you handle this
>>post. Remember to answer everything and no snipping and running.
>>
>>Shall I write the spank claim now?
>
> Its confirmed,

Confirmed that nobody answered your cries for help.

heh

 

[Aratzio]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:05:51 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, Meat Plow
<meat@petitmorte.net> bloviated:

>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:14:22 +0100, Timmay! wrote:
>

<SNIP>

>> Its confirmed,
>
>Confirmed that nobody answered your cries for help.
>
>heh

You forgot the part that makes him cry.