B
bob young
Guest
Free Lunch wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:35:18 -0700, in alt.atheism
> scottrichter422@yahoo.com (Scott Richter) wrote in
> <1i4ivfn.5dppa859zxttN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com>:
> >Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> >> The stories from the Bible are only as accurate as the Bible. What
> >> evidence do you have that the Bible is reliable?
> >
> >Silly rabbit...
> >
> >The bible is reliable because the bible says it is reliable, and
> >futhermore, it says that no additional evidence is required. In fact,
> >any evidence that contradicts the bible must be the work of the devil,
> >and how reliable could THAT be? Q.E.D.
>
> I've had religious teachers who came very close to saying exactly that.
This guy said the same thing, thought it worth keeping:
Christians don't believe there are contradictions in the bible.
Why?
Because it's not written in the bible that there are any.
[With acknowledgments to Andrew W.]
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:35:18 -0700, in alt.atheism
> scottrichter422@yahoo.com (Scott Richter) wrote in
> <1i4ivfn.5dppa859zxttN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com>:
> >Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> >> The stories from the Bible are only as accurate as the Bible. What
> >> evidence do you have that the Bible is reliable?
> >
> >Silly rabbit...
> >
> >The bible is reliable because the bible says it is reliable, and
> >futhermore, it says that no additional evidence is required. In fact,
> >any evidence that contradicts the bible must be the work of the devil,
> >and how reliable could THAT be? Q.E.D.
>
> I've had religious teachers who came very close to saying exactly that.
This guy said the same thing, thought it worth keeping:
Christians don't believe there are contradictions in the bible.
Why?
Because it's not written in the bible that there are any.
[With acknowledgments to Andrew W.]