WHY DO CHRISTIANS LISTEN TO CAVE DWELLERS AND GOAT ****ERS ?

  • Thread starter SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim
  • Start date
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
<killgod@killgod.com> wrote:

>
>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>
>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>PIXIE
>>>presented by the christian nuts.

>>
>> It's called eye witnesses.


>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat ****ers from a couple of
>thousand years ago.
>try again.


Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?

>you're not going to suggest that ernest angley or benny hinn were really
>healing people are you? if so, why didn't they heal amputees? what does the
>christian god have against amputees?


Amputees are a result of man's sins.

duke, American-American

"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:h04qn3trous54o9ic7ih83d60n8dm3li5r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>>PIXIE
>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>
>>> It's called eye witnesses.

>
>>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat ****ers from a couple
>>of
>>thousand years ago.
>>try again.

>
> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?


1552 before the invention of the printing press. Prior to the pring press
everything was pure heresay!

>>you're not going to suggest that ernest angley or benny hinn were really
>>healing people are you? if so, why didn't they heal amputees? what does
>>the
>>christian god have against amputees?

>
> Amputees are a result of man's sins.
>
> duke, American-American
>
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
>
 
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W"
<removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:

>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>
>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>PIXIE
>>>presented by the christian nuts.

>>
>> It's called eye witnesses.

>
>
>Can we interview one of these witnesses?


Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the
days of Jesus.

duke, American-American

"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
 
On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:

>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY PIXIE
>> >presented by the christian nuts.

>> It's called eye witnesses.....


>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as an
>innocent child.


Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000
years now. Now that's truth.


duke, American-American

"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
 
"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:477B0F31.73C30E16@netvigator.com...
>
>
> Bob Frapples wrote:
>
>> alt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, Andrew W wrote:
>> >
>> >> "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>> >>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>> >>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN
>> >>>> SKY
>> >>>> PIXIE
>> >>>> presented by the christian nuts.
>> >>> It's called eye witnesses.
>> >>
>> >> Can we interview one of these witnesses?
>> >
>> > As long as we are allowed to interview an eye witness to Julius Caesar.

>>
>> A MAJOR difference here, though, is that there are no extraordinary
>> claims regarding Julius Caesar. Extraordinary claims (such as those
>> claims made about Jesus) require extraordinary evidence. An eyewitness
>> account is not extraordinary. Besides, we DO NOT HAVE eyewitness
>> accounts of the life of Jesus. The gospels were written long after the
>> supposed time of the crucifixion and simply CANNOT be taken as
>> eyewitness accounts. In a court of law they would simply be dismissed as
>> hearsay.

>
> Or, wasting The Court's time
>
>>
>> If God came to earth in the flesh and sacrificed himself to himself to
>> save all of mankind (which is another subject entirely) why on earth is
>> there such feeble evidence of such an occurrence? It seems that giving
>> mankind sufficient evidence would be a far lesser challenge than the
>> whole sacrifice business in itself.

>
> Absolutely


The average person today does not appreciate the difficulty and unlikelihood

of producing accurate transmissions of the original Bibles.



One of the problems with the accuracy of the Bibles is that when they were
copied,

no marks of punctuation were used, no distinction was made between lower
case and upper case letters and more bizarre to modern script, no spaces
were used to separate words.



This kind of continuous writing was called "scriptuo continua"

'godisnowhere' could mean 'god is now here' or quit the opposite, 'god is no
where' depending on the spacing which not used at the time. This left
accurate interpretation

very difficult and unlikely.



Add to this the natural occurrence of errors of transmission and the
intentional modification to suit e the transcribers wishes and beliefs and
you have documents of highly questionable meaning and accuracy.



Further compounding the problem was the size and accuracy of the
vocabularies which were much more limited than today.
 
"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
news:634nn3hj213knvg0gjrcoo7523f9ntgkl0@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:27:09 +1100, "Andrew W"
> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message
>>news:pm9mn3tsjkhj0dtursibp1vdifeputdsc2@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:14:47 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Feng" <Feng@earth.com> wrote in message



> Christ's truth should not be determined by what's in people's mind, it
> should be determined by what's in people's heart.


Get an education. The only thing in peoples hearts is blood and muscle.

All thought, imagination and reason is in peoples brains!
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:b44qn3l8gb6qg5b9ikood3r9cccbmd5h5p@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W"
> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>>PIXIE
>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>
>>> It's called eye witnesses.

>>
>>
>>Can we interview one of these witnesses?

>
> Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the
> days of Jesus.


Get an education! At the 'claimed time of Jesus' all information was
transmitted by word of mouth and copied
text.

During the Civil War we had hundreds of printing presses and Newspapers.
There is a huge difference in
reliability and accuracy between to the two time periods.

> duke, American-American
>
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
>
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d64qn3dku2k4tpqtc2jverfjne8og5pokt@4ax.com...
> On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>> >PIXIE
>>> >presented by the christian nuts.
>>> It's called eye witnesses.....

>
>>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as
>>an
>>innocent child.

>
> Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000
> years now. Now that's truth.


Yes, the myths and fables have continued for 2,000 years but their accuracy
and
authenticvity have been challenged by thousands of scholers ever since!

> duke, American-American
>
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
>
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:h04qn3trous54o9ic7ih83d60n8dm3li5r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>>PIXIE
>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>
>>> It's called eye witnesses.

>
>>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat ****ers from a couple
>>of
>>thousand years ago.
>>try again.

>
> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?


In 33AD, when Jesus allegedly left the earth (that was the last time anyone
saw him), and around 100AD, when the last eye witness died.
After that all we have is hearsay, and some copied reading material from
pious priests and scribes.

>
>>you're not going to suggest that ernest angley or benny hinn were really
>>healing people are you? if so, why didn't they heal amputees? what does
>>the
>>christian god have against amputees?

>
> Amputees are a result of man's sins.


What about babies that are born without limbs?


--
Andrew W.

Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth
naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief
and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the
messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous.

You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda

Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit
guides, earth changes.
http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm

The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich
Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm

Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it!
http://www.acim.org/

Religion Exposed!
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:b44qn3l8gb6qg5b9ikood3r9cccbmd5h5p@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W"
> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>>PIXIE
>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>
>>> It's called eye witnesses.

>>
>>
>>Can we interview one of these witnesses?

>
> Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the
> days of Jesus.



Not much comparison. The Civil War was a more recent event and was recorded
with better methods.
And it was not pumped up by zealous religionists.

--
Andrew W.

Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth
naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief
and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the
messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous.

You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda

Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit
guides, earth changes.
http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm

The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich
Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm

Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it!
http://www.acim.org/

Religion Exposed!
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d64qn3dku2k4tpqtc2jverfjne8og5pokt@4ax.com...
> On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>> >PIXIE
>>> >presented by the christian nuts.
>>> It's called eye witnesses.....

>
>>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as
>>an
>>innocent child.

>
> Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000
> years now. Now that's truth.



Its called popularity.
And it has been challenged many times.


--
Andrew W.

Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth
naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief
and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the
messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous.

You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda

Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit
guides, earth changes.
http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm

The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich
Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm

Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it!
http://www.acim.org/

Religion Exposed!
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner
 
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +1100, "Andrew W"
<removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:

>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2soon318meoh31nm4cbeoamdjqsjklk01j@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:28:17 +1100, "Andrew W"
>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:195nn31p7iqvltojc0bin3urv4pnif94jj@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:46 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4m9mn3915vegf3j2askte8c5hes2kbsjid@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>>>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>>>>>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN
>>>>>>>>>SKY
>>>>>>>>>PIXIE
>>>>>>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called eye witnesses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Can we interview one of these witnesses?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You ask for a witness, yet you take a woman's word for it who
>>>>>> claims to have spoken to Jesus Christ in the 60's, and now follow
>>>>>> her newly designed religion. Please stop being a hypocrite.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this your best rebuke? I follow one woman's religion, yeah right.
>>>>>Whatever.
>>>>
>>>> So now you're claiming you don't follow her teachings?
>>>
>>>I don't follow any one source of teachings.

>>
>> The fact is she is one of the people you follow. You falsely try
>> to now deny this, if you recall your "yeah right. Whatever." from
>> above. End of argument.
>>
>> gabriel

>
>
>You seem to have a fixation about this.


About sometimes taking the time to expose false claims, yes.
Sorry.

>I don't follow people. I search for information and truth.
>Anyone can be a channel for higher information. In many ways we all are at
>different times.
>In creation all intelligent life forms are information points.


So then you'll post anyone in your sig that claims to have spoken
with Jesus Christ recently? Of course not, as that numbers in the
thousands of such false claims. You clearly follow her teachings
as some sort of authority in your life since she claims to have
spoken to Christ herself. Any witnesses? Of course not. But keep
asking others for the same thing. :-/

gabriel
 
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:43:16 -0000, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

>
>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:h04qn3trous54o9ic7ih83d60n8dm3li5r@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
>>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>>>>PIXIE
>>>>>presented by the christian nuts.
>>>>
>>>> It's called eye witnesses.

>>
>>>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat ****ers from a couple
>>>of
>>>thousand years ago.
>>>try again.

>>
>> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
>> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?

>
>1552 before the invention of the printing press. Prior to the pring press
>everything was pure heresay!


But they copied on the pring [sic] press that which was available
before.

duke, American-American

"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
 
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:37:23 +1100, "Andrew W"
<removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:

>> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
>> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?


>In 33AD, when Jesus allegedly left the earth (that was the last time anyone
> saw him), and around 100AD, when the last eye witness died.
>After that all we have is hearsay, and some copied reading material from
>pious priests and scribes.


So you're professing that all is lies after 100AD re Christ, and say,
AD1980, when the American Civil War became questionable because all
eye witnesses had died?

>> Amputees are a result of man's sins.

>What about babies that are born without limbs?


Same.

duke, American-American

"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
 
"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3emqn356chu12i0n26v5sm3lqdviij1uq7@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +1100, "Andrew W"
> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:2soon318meoh31nm4cbeoamdjqsjklk01j@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:28:17 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:195nn31p7iqvltojc0bin3urv4pnif94jj@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:46 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:4m9mn3915vegf3j2askte8c5hes2kbsjid@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Can we interview one of these witnesses?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You ask for a witness, yet you take a woman's word for it who
>>>>>>> claims to have spoken to Jesus Christ in the 60's, and now follow
>>>>>>> her newly designed religion. Please stop being a hypocrite.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is this your best rebuke? I follow one woman's religion, yeah right.
>>>>>>Whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> So now you're claiming you don't follow her teachings?
>>>>
>>>>I don't follow any one source of teachings.
>>>
>>> The fact is she is one of the people you follow. You falsely try
>>> to now deny this, if you recall your "yeah right. Whatever." from
>>> above. End of argument.
>>>
>>> gabriel

>>
>>
>>You seem to have a fixation about this.

>
> About sometimes taking the time to expose false claims, yes.
> Sorry.


Focus your efforts on exposing the known false claims of the Christian
religion and you'd be making yourself useful.

>
>>I don't follow people. I search for information and truth.
>>Anyone can be a channel for higher information. In many ways we all are at
>>different times.
>>In creation all intelligent life forms are information points.

>
> So then you'll post anyone in your sig that claims to have spoken
> with Jesus Christ recently? Of course not, as that numbers in the
> thousands of such false claims.


Christianity often makes the same sorts of claims, but for some reason it's
alright when they do it.

> You clearly follow her teachings
> as some sort of authority in your life since she claims to have
> spoken to Christ herself. Any witnesses? Of course not. But keep
> asking others for the same thing. :-/


If you look at that and other such materials you will see that its of higher
spiritual quality than most of what's in the Bible, especially since the
sentences are in most cases not as vague, short and open to interpretation
as the Christian scriptures. Also the scriptures have had some parts removed
by unknown individuals.

And your Bible is written, copied and edited by men, most of whom never met
Jesus. What have you got against a woman receiving spiritual information?
And besides, there are also men today who are receiving this kind of
spiritual information. You have just chosen to pick on one website and one
woman for some reason.
You have chosen an easy target and ignored the rest.

>
> gabriel



--
Andrew W.

Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth
naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief
and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the
messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous.

You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda

Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit
guides, earth changes.
http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm

The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich
Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm

Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it!
http://www.acim.org/

Religion Exposed!
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner
 
>
> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from
> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007?
>
>>you're not going to suggest that ernest angley or benny hinn were really
>>healing people are you? if so, why didn't they heal amputees? what does
>>the
>>christian god have against amputees?

>
> Amputees are a result of man's sins.


why did the christian god create sin?
are you going to suggest that a chid who is handicapped sinned too?
your bullshit god is a SICK MOTHER****ER

>
> duke, brainwashed christian retard
 
>>What about babies that are born without limbs?
>
> Same.


babies don't sin you retarded asshole

>
> duke, brainwashed christian retard
 
>>
>>translation - christian cult members

>
> Christianity as a religion has fallen victim to the evil dark lord. It
> can't cleanse anyone. It only contaminates everyone. The real
> spiritual cleansing only happens to the individuals.


christianity is and always has been a TOTAL AND COMPLETE CROCK OF CRAP

>
 
>>Can we interview one of these witnesses?
>
> Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the
> days of Jesus.


so you're admitting that there is no current eyewitness, good for you

>
> duke, brainwashed christian retard
 
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d64qn3dku2k4tpqtc2jverfjne8og5pokt@4ax.com...
> On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY
>>> >PIXIE
>>> >presented by the christian nuts.
>>> It's called eye witnesses.....

>
>>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as
>>an
>>innocent child.

>
> Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000
> years now. Now that's truth.


santa claus and the tooth fairy have been around for awhile too duke, and
your god is no more real than they are
..

>
>
> duke, brainwashed christian moron
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
2
Views
18
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim
S
S
Replies
12
Views
16
Andrew
A
S
Replies
0
Views
12
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim
S
S
Replies
0
Views
14
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim
S
Back
Top