Women are the new men on TV

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out of
>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
>>MANY
>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that and
>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your self
>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
>
> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
> TV ads were won by females???
>
> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?

No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:11:39 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>> Yeah and she lists Viagra commercials which dupe men into thinking
>> they have to please the gal and take medication to do so. This takes
>> any responsibility off the gals. Sound familiar? It's the same old
>> mantra of feminists, "All responsibility on men and none on women".
>
>I'm a man, you dumb****.

Lie. No matter what the **** your biology is.

>You think in terms of men vs.
>women. I don't.

You think in terms of females vs men, you sick, sick asshole.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:11:39 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>> Yeah and she lists Viagra commercials which dupe men into thinking
>> they have to please the gal and take medication to do so. This takes
>> any responsibility off the gals. Sound familiar? It's the same old
>> mantra of feminists, "All responsibility on men and none on women".
>
>I'm a man, you dumb****.

Lie. No matter what the **** your biology is.

>You think in terms of men vs.
>women. I don't.

You think in terms of females vs men, you sick, sick asshole.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:10:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>Yet, so often, it seems that your kind of bigot today are just as equally
>racist as they are sexist. I've often seen the same man on the Internet
>rant and rave about feminists and then later one see a post he replied to
>suggest he is also racist.

Prove that. Although anti-feminist, I'm no bigot, and have never
posted anything racist.

>Some type of insecurity seems to know no bounds.

i.e., yours.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:10:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>Yet, so often, it seems that your kind of bigot today are just as equally
>racist as they are sexist. I've often seen the same man on the Internet
>rant and rave about feminists and then later one see a post he replied to
>suggest he is also racist.

Prove that. Although anti-feminist, I'm no bigot, and have never
posted anything racist.

>Some type of insecurity seems to know no bounds.

i.e., yours.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:34 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>
>"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
>news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>>
>>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out of
>>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
>>>MANY
>>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that and
>>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your self
>>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
>>
>> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
>> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
>> TV ads were won by females???
>>
>> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
>> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?
>
>No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
>world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

You total moron! Are you saying that over the last 30 years there have
been no female vs men issues??? And that those issues haven't taken
center stage for millions of people? Jesus, talk about delusion.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:34 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>
>"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
>news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>>
>>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out of
>>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
>>>MANY
>>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that and
>>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your self
>>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
>>
>> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
>> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
>> TV ads were won by females???
>>
>> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
>> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?
>
>No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
>world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

You total moron! Are you saying that over the last 30 years there have
been no female vs men issues??? And that those issues haven't taken
center stage for millions of people? Jesus, talk about delusion.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:qodle3t89dmoeg8qik8d4rqqbo4878bgbd@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:25:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>> If you stopped watching TV, how do you know what's broadcast?
>>
>>He's "all knowing," or didn't you realize that?
>
> Glad you finally realized it.
>
>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>women.
>
> It's not for men of any intelligence.

BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.
>
>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>Advertisement.
>
> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.

Aw, is you jealous or someding?

Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
are men not women. It's been my experience that guys aren't that interested
in what women do other than stay faithful and do their part (that's the
majority of reasonable guys).

>
>>I think that just because a some advertisements and movies
>>are made specifically for women audience, these guys have (perhaps for the
>>first time in their self centered existence) have realized that it isn't
>>all
>>about them.
>
> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.

You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

>
> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.

Is the lowlife upset?

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:qodle3t89dmoeg8qik8d4rqqbo4878bgbd@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:25:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>> If you stopped watching TV, how do you know what's broadcast?
>>
>>He's "all knowing," or didn't you realize that?
>
> Glad you finally realized it.
>
>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>women.
>
> It's not for men of any intelligence.

BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.
>
>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>Advertisement.
>
> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.

Aw, is you jealous or someding?

Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
are men not women. It's been my experience that guys aren't that interested
in what women do other than stay faithful and do their part (that's the
majority of reasonable guys).

>
>>I think that just because a some advertisements and movies
>>are made specifically for women audience, these guys have (perhaps for the
>>first time in their self centered existence) have realized that it isn't
>>all
>>about them.
>
> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.

You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

>
> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.

Is the lowlife upset?

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:06:31 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>>women.
>>
>> It's not for men of any intelligence.
>
>BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.

Compare that to the five channels designed for females. Not the
mention all the rest of TV.

>>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>>Advertisement.
>>
>> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.
>
>Aw, is you jealous or someding?

Aw, is you a ****ing moron or something?

>Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
>are men not women.

I was talking about ****ing ads. This thread is about TV, stay on
track, asshole.

>> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
>> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.
>
>You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
>LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

Not worth a reply.

>> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.
>
>Is the lowlife upset?

You sure look like it.

 

[Viking]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:06:31 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:

>>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>>women.
>>
>> It's not for men of any intelligence.
>
>BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.

Compare that to the five channels designed for females. Not the
mention all the rest of TV.

>>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>>Advertisement.
>>
>> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.
>
>Aw, is you jealous or someding?

Aw, is you a ****ing moron or something?

>Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
>are men not women.

I was talking about ****ing ads. This thread is about TV, stay on
track, asshole.

>> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
>> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.
>
>You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
>LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.

Not worth a reply.

>> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.
>
>Is the lowlife upset?

You sure look like it.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:h4ele3t17k7pnoq084lrpvro4ks8jvajpu@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:11:39 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>> Yeah and she lists Viagra commercials which dupe men into thinking
>>> they have to please the gal and take medication to do so. This takes
>>> any responsibility off the gals. Sound familiar? It's the same old
>>> mantra of feminists, "All responsibility on men and none on women".
>>
>>I'm a man, you dumb****.
>
> Lie. No matter what the **** your biology is.

Is the lowlife upset? lol You think that only real men fight women and/or
feminists? lol THAT makes you a bigot, definately not on the highest
intelligence stratum and probably you're very brutish in real life guessing
from your posting style.
>
>>You think in terms of men vs.
>>women. I don't.
>
> You think in terms of females vs men, you sick, sick asshole.

Can you only echo other people's thoughts only reversed? lol I do NOT
think of terms of gender vs. gender, dumbass. YOu're the one whining that
women have all the power. Only a delusion half wit could come to that
conclusion.

Yeah, you do think in terms of men vs. women. EVERYTHING you've posted is
of that nature so far. DUH

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:h4ele3t17k7pnoq084lrpvro4ks8jvajpu@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:11:39 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>> Yeah and she lists Viagra commercials which dupe men into thinking
>>> they have to please the gal and take medication to do so. This takes
>>> any responsibility off the gals. Sound familiar? It's the same old
>>> mantra of feminists, "All responsibility on men and none on women".
>>
>>I'm a man, you dumb****.
>
> Lie. No matter what the **** your biology is.

Is the lowlife upset? lol You think that only real men fight women and/or
feminists? lol THAT makes you a bigot, definately not on the highest
intelligence stratum and probably you're very brutish in real life guessing
from your posting style.
>
>>You think in terms of men vs.
>>women. I don't.
>
> You think in terms of females vs men, you sick, sick asshole.

Can you only echo other people's thoughts only reversed? lol I do NOT
think of terms of gender vs. gender, dumbass. YOu're the one whining that
women have all the power. Only a delusion half wit could come to that
conclusion.

Yeah, you do think in terms of men vs. women. EVERYTHING you've posted is
of that nature so far. DUH

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:h6fle3luuthp202h2cuq009rjiaqavptmh@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:10:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>Yet, so often, it seems that your kind of bigot today are just as equally
>>racist as they are sexist. I've often seen the same man on the
>>Internet
>>rant and rave about feminists and then later one see a post he replied to
>>suggest he is also racist.
>
> Prove that. Although anti-feminist, I'm no bigot, and have never
> posted anything racist.
>
>>Some type of insecurity seems to know no bounds.
>
> i.e., yours.

Can't you see how totally juvenile your short responses are?

It is, however, very much true, that I've seen many many bigots cross the
line of sexists AND racists. Yet, I have met racists who are not sexist and
vice versa.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:h6fle3luuthp202h2cuq009rjiaqavptmh@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:10:02 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>Yet, so often, it seems that your kind of bigot today are just as equally
>>racist as they are sexist. I've often seen the same man on the
>>Internet
>>rant and rave about feminists and then later one see a post he replied to
>>suggest he is also racist.
>
> Prove that. Although anti-feminist, I'm no bigot, and have never
> posted anything racist.
>
>>Some type of insecurity seems to know no bounds.
>
> i.e., yours.

Can't you see how totally juvenile your short responses are?

It is, however, very much true, that I've seen many many bigots cross the
line of sexists AND racists. Yet, I have met racists who are not sexist and
vice versa.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:uafle3h8d9o35egok41rc4f8u2tmhsnvms@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:34 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
>>news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out
>>>>of
>>>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
>>>>MANY
>>>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that
>>>>and
>>>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your
>>>>self
>>>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
>>>
>>> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
>>> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
>>> TV ads were won by females???
>>>
>>> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
>>> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?
>>
>>No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
>>world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.
>
> You total moron! Are you saying that over the last 30 years there have
> been no female vs men issues??? And that those issues haven't taken
> center stage for millions of people? Jesus, talk about delusion.

I don't think men (generally speaking) have been "against" women in the
past. I just think they were clueless and thought they were supposed to
rule. Religion teaches us that and we ALL evolved from brutish socieites.
We are not naturally good or bad rulers (men, if you can't keep up).
Gender isn't a prerequisite for rulership/leadership.

Feminism (not every feminist, mind you) is not anti-male. To fight for
freedoms denied to them is not, by necessity, anti male. DUH I guess all
black people fighting for civil rights were and are anti-white? You sure
are pitiful in your logic.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:uafle3h8d9o35egok41rc4f8u2tmhsnvms@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:34 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
>>news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out
>>>>of
>>>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
>>>>MANY
>>>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that
>>>>and
>>>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your
>>>>self
>>>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
>>>
>>> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
>>> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
>>> TV ads were won by females???
>>>
>>> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
>>> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?
>>
>>No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
>>world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.
>
> You total moron! Are you saying that over the last 30 years there have
> been no female vs men issues??? And that those issues haven't taken
> center stage for millions of people? Jesus, talk about delusion.

I don't think men (generally speaking) have been "against" women in the
past. I just think they were clueless and thought they were supposed to
rule. Religion teaches us that and we ALL evolved from brutish socieites.
We are not naturally good or bad rulers (men, if you can't keep up).
Gender isn't a prerequisite for rulership/leadership.

Feminism (not every feminist, mind you) is not anti-male. To fight for
freedoms denied to them is not, by necessity, anti male. DUH I guess all
black people fighting for civil rights were and are anti-white? You sure
are pitiful in your logic.

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:e0gle3t2tej0g818eti5va8sr4d1o330ju@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:06:31 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>>>women.
>>>
>>> It's not for men of any intelligence.
>>
>>BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.
>
> Compare that to the five channels designed for females. Not the
> mention all the rest of TV.
>
>>>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>>>Advertisement.
>>>
>>> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.
>>
>>Aw, is you jealous or someding?
>
> Aw, is you a ****ing moron or something?
>
>>Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
>>are men not women.
>
> I was talking about ****ing ads. This thread is about TV, stay on
> track, asshole.

Is the lowlife upset. You're stretching to make a point out of movies
(which, dumbo, are on TV) and advertisement. The ultimate issue is who
controls Hollywood/Advertisement Agencies and who their targets are. DUH
Why can't YOU understand the implications of the issue at hand?


>
>>> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
>>> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.
>>
>>You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
>>LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.
>
> Not worth a reply.

What? You must of used up all your juvenile responses then.
>
>>> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.
>>
>>Is the lowlife upset?
>
> You sure look like it.

Another juvennile response. You can't even slam people in an adult manner.
LOL

 

[Jude]

"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
news:e0gle3t2tej0g818eti5va8sr4d1o330ju@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:06:31 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
>>>>I guess Spike TV is for
>>>>women.
>>>
>>> It's not for men of any intelligence.
>>
>>BUT, it's for men. AND, many intelligent men like bang bang shoot 'em up.
>
> Compare that to the five channels designed for females. Not the
> mention all the rest of TV.
>
>>>>Men are STILL the overwhelming controllers of Hollywood and
>>>>Advertisement.
>>>
>>> AND THEY'RE ALL ****ING AIMED AT FEMALES.
>>
>>Aw, is you jealous or someding?
>
> Aw, is you a ****ing moron or something?
>
>>Anyway, you're wrong. The overwhelming number of protangonists in movies
>>are men not women.
>
> I was talking about ****ing ads. This thread is about TV, stay on
> track, asshole.

Is the lowlife upset. You're stretching to make a point out of movies
(which, dumbo, are on TV) and advertisement. The ultimate issue is who
controls Hollywood/Advertisement Agencies and who their targets are. DUH
Why can't YOU understand the implications of the issue at hand?


>
>>> YOU TOTAL MORON. Read the article linked to by the OP. Watch some TV
>>> and LOOK AT THE ****ING ADS.
>>
>>You're the moron. You're a freaking adult man acting like a jealous boy.
>>LIKE I SAID: get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.
>
> Not worth a reply.

What? You must of used up all your juvenile responses then.
>
>>> TRY USING ONE OF YOUR TWO NEURONS YOU ****ING FREAK.
>>
>>Is the lowlife upset?
>
> You sure look like it.

Another juvennile response. You can't even slam people in an adult manner.
LOL

 

[Mark Borgerson]

In article <uafle3h8d9o35egok41rc4f8u2tmhsnvms@4ax.com>,
noway@goodgoodbye.com says...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:34 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Viking" <noway@goodgoodbye.com> wrote in message
> >news:ahdle3hdua761o48dckeh7r7l4dac7q82r@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:41 -0500, "Jude" <Cajun@thebayou.wet> wrote:
> >>
> >>>You're the freaking joke because I dont' think anybody who operates out of
> >>>logic and not self pity would take what you said seriously. There are
> >>>MANY
> >>>ads directed to men with the underlying message "You buy this or that and
> >>>you get the girl." DUH I don't have to do research to educate your self
> >>>imposed ignorance. It's a no brainer as they say.
> >>
> >> There ain't such ads, you sad sack. Ads are aimed at females. Didn't
> >> you read that study poted here that said 98% of the "mini-battles" in
> >> TV ads were won by females???
> >>
> >> So let me get this straight. You fabricate a scenario, and then say
> >> "DUH". laugh What's your ****ing psychosis?
> >
> >No, it's yours because you live in a world of delusion. You think of the
> >world as men vs. women. Get out of the sandbox and grow the **** up.
>
> You total moron! Are you saying that over the last 30 years there have
> been no female vs men issues??? And that those issues haven't taken
> center stage for millions of people? Jesus, talk about delusion.
>
>
Whoa! "millions of people"! WOW---you mean those issues might affect
as much as 1% of the worlds population! Notify the media! Call a press
conference! Buy an hour of prime time TV to get people's attention!
;-)


Mark Borgerson