timesjoke

We sure do have a lot more women bedding young boys in school these days.

I never said it would be easy, just possible. If Brown had your way of "assuming" that there was no way of winning against a long standing liberal voting style of an area, he would never have won. If you don't try, the result is always 'you lose'.

Well first of all there is no one 'right' answer but my own point of view is that it does happen more often and is caused mostly by a change in society to no longer hold anyone responsible for their own actions. You can even kill someone, be found 'insane' then after a short time in a mental facility be back on the street again because your mental illness was 'cured'. Outside of being insane there are a host of new and interesting ways a person can kill another person and still be found not guilty because of masterful legal games and theatrics in a courtroom (see OJ). To a small degree I believe 'some' women do dress way to provacative but as you say, there is no excuse for attacking someone in that way and while the woman "MIGHT" have drawn more attention to herself and made herself a target because of her dress....the sick piece of garbage who would actually attack a woman would have forund someone to attack if not that woman so still the blame falls on them, not the woman. That said, I would still think some common sense should be considered. I know there are areas of several towns I travel to that should be avoided if I want to avoid trouble. I would not start trouble but I find it smart to avoid the possibility of someone else starting trouble I might get pulled into. Women know they will get lots of attention if they dress that way, (that is the point right?) so by knowing this before they ever leave the house, I would say some extra precautions should be taken to be sure she is safe should be considered. Staying with a group of other girls is a good example.

Right, and your completely impartial, lol.

I have to say I agree completely with em on this. I remember taking courses in college where it was said the majority of human comunication was not the words themselves. We gave greater context to the words through body language and inflection of voice for example. Now our society is moving to complete text communication without any non-verbal cues to assist in our communicating.

I can gurantee you that she was My comment was in general about the comunity and while some may not agree, I consider myself part of the community so that means my comment was also about me. Yes, I can see where "them" may seem like I was excluding myself but that was not how I intended it to sound and I am sorry for not making it more clear Chi.

Maybe try to understand them before you say they have no class? I have had my share of missing an intended humor mixed into a discussion I was taking seriously, I can admit that, but something like this thread is obviously intended to be funny and even my limited ability to see humor had no problem seeing that. If your going to stick around this community, maybe you should try to get to know people a little more before accusing them of being without class. [attach=full]2685[/attach]

Now your back to talking about presidential races, yes, I agree that on the National scale, California does lean very heavy to the liberal canidate, but that has very little to do with local House races, and it is a specific House race I am speaking about. Every poll conducted on expected voters in her district has shown a steady decline on her approval numbers. Her name is permenentely attached to most of the negative legislation that has been passed, and is hurting the people of California. No, removing her will not be easy, but it is certainly possible especially if she forces through legislation like the healthcare bill when even the majority of California voters do not want it to be passed. I do know one thing for sure hugo, you can't beat her unless you try. You know hugo, you seem to think certain people like Obama and Pelosi are invincible, are you star struck? I agree great challenge exists, but I do not believe they are invincible.

1972 was the last time a Republican was elected to the Senate from the entire State of Massachusetts. Scott Brown ran as one of his main promises to vote against Obama's healthcare agenda and other radical liberal policies. I believe it is fair to say that Mr. Kennedy was just as much radical liberal as Nancy is so getting Brown to fill that seat is as close to night and day as someone could imagine. Sure, Brown did not have to run against Kennedy but at the same time Kennedy had pretty high approval numbers where Nancy does not. Now, on the other hand California is bankrupt, has been bankrupt for many years. They are losing businesses and the "rich" in droves and they cannot tax their way out of this hole they have dug. The people are not completely blind to these facts, they can see what is happening. There are advertisements on their local television stations with other States inviting business owners to move to their States where they can keep most of their earned money instead of giving it to a corrupt California Government. The every day people also see these things and the daily reports of the State being broke. I would think there is fertile soil to grow some real conservative ideas and canidates to clean out the waste, to steer the State back to fiscal responsibility and bring jobs back to the State by ending the policy of punnishing the job creators. Easy? No, but certainly possible. Obama's plans promise much higher taxes for most Americans either directly or indirectly through higher costs of goods/services. If I was running for office in California I would push this fact and ask them all if they think they still have the room in their household budgets to pay higher taxes? Then I would ask them to sit down and figure out what each Californian himself receives in California as a resident that other residents of other States do not get to make the much, much higher taxes worth it? Everyone gets roads and schools so those things do not count, so what is it that they get to justify the out of control taxes? California gets just as many tourists as Florida but there are no State income taxes and no massive businesses taxes in Florida so why can't California do the same thing?

Wern't talking about presidential races.

Now, there was a time, when they used to say, that behind ev'ry great man, there had to be a great woman. But oh, in these times of change, you know that it's no longer true. So we're comin' out of the kitchen, 'cause there's something we forgot to say to you. We say, Sisters are doin' it for themselves

They were thinking the same thing for Massachusetts too.

Yes, very funny

I was watching a comedian on HBO and something he said seems to fit this discussion well: "I have made women climax before, so don't look at me, your vagina must be broken"....... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBO9r2-kn8Y]YouTube- FEMALE G-SPOT ORGAMS AND SQUIRTING ORGASM A HOW TO[/ame]

Well even the polls in California show the majority there do not think she is doing a good job.

Um, let me get this straight, Nancy says they are there to do the job for the America people, and that her fellow elected officials should pass her idea of healthcare reform even if it means they will not get re-elected..... But if the people respond to their actions by voting them out of office, does that not mean they were "NOT" working for the people in reality? The people would only react like that if you upset them and why would they get upset if you were 'representing' their possitions on these issues? That is the problem though, our represenative style of Government has us voters putting people into office based on the lies the person told to us that we believed. Then in many cases the elected official ignores his/her constituants until just before it is time for re-election time then they will lie some more just to get votes again. A lot of Americans are getting tired of this cycle.

I believe a good arguement can be made that Obama is running the lest transparent administration ever.

I have also known women who you could offer too much stimulation. I have found alternating the type/degree/intensity of stimulation can help get them "over the mountain" than just going full steam ahead. Even blowing/light finger touching on the area can offer a light stimulation but let her smooth out or just stop and pay attention to other areas she enjoys being stimulated and then when you go back to direct stimulation of the area a little later she can pop. I have had many women tell me the worse thing a guy can do is just 'go crazy' on it, pay attention to her actions and if she is not the type to tell you how your doing verbally, then you have to try and figure out what her body is telling you, yes this can be difficult until you get to know each other well in bed. Some people may never really know their partner in bed unfortunately. Women, tell you men how we are doing, I know sometimes it is hard for women to even speak and if that means your guy is doing well then cool, but if he is not doing what you want or need then you have to figure out how to tell him. We have ears, use those ears to stear us around. Maybe talk to your man ahead of time and come up with some signals if talking is not your thing. Communication really is the key. Yes, a few men might get hurt feelings if you make him feel like an idiot, but I would like to believe that most of us men want to make you ladies happy, but as with other things, we need the woman to give us some hints, and even wack us over the head sometimes to get let us know what we need to do.

I'll bring the luffa sponge

True, and if we were to insert the natural way the Government runs things much worse than the private sector, then even though on paper it would look like people are getting it for 'free' they would actually make it cost more. That is why it takes 15 months to get an MRI in Canada, the Government there ran out of money and the only way to keep things going was to scale back services. Nothing worth having is free.

Well said, I agree completely. I actually get very turned on by a woman who knows what she wants and is not afraid to spell it out for you. I like most men can sometimes be a tad clueless about the intricate and complex wonder called a woman and we need a little nudging down the right path from time to time.

Then your doing the right thing, not your fault if someone does not want to understand that. You may have to be a tad more clear, like with a bat, lol.

Well I can say that for each woman I have known there seems to be slight differences in things but it is certainly a reality. There are many stories of how some men have difficulty finding it so that may lead a few to think it is just a rumor but I can say as one man that I have found at least a couple so it is not all rumor........

I would agree with this, but I am also very old in my opinions. The new and modern society has things like the 'booty call' where you just have sex and go your seperate ways so that sure blows away the notion of dating I suppose. Ali, My guess would be that the boundries need to be set with whoever it was, you may have made a stronger impression on him than he made on you so he wants it to be more personal while you don't. I would just be honest with him and tell him that your not ready for anything like an exclusive relationship right now and go from there.

Thanks Merc