So by your example, you just throw out random thoughts of Desmond Morris without taking sexual selection, based on primal females attracting a male, into consideration?
You are not arguing evolution and creationism anymore, you are arguing a theory of evolution over another theory of evolution.
I spend a lot of time comparing one theory and another all in my attempts to look for the truth. In many cases I have found combinations of ideas and viewpoints bring me the most information instead of getting myself bogged down in any one person's thoughts of what "they" think the truth is, we are all humans, nobody is any better then anyone else if you take the time to educate yourself.
Attracting and keeping a male is very important, but in all other life forms enlarged ******* are not one of the factors, not even in apes who many evolutionists believe we came from so why?
Why? Looking foward instead of backward, why would nature believe this one form of life needed enlarged ******* when no other creature on the face of the planet needed them? Legs to walk on land, okay, air breathing lungs, okay that seems important......enlarged *******? Not needed in apes, so there is no reasonable need for them in humans.
My point was to show how even science gets befuddled by *******, but at the end of the day we men still love them
Do you think I woke up one morning and declared myself a believer in evolution of the species?
No, I believe most atheists are anti-religion so that drives them to the anti-religion science of evolution as their faith. Birds of a feather and all that. It fills your need to feel justified in rejecting Faith.
Evolution is 2% hard data in the form of fossil records and 98% Interpretation, the person in control of the mind determins the Interpretation and if they want excuses to reject the notion of ***, then their mind will provide the missing pieces to make that happen.
Now I will admit that this can also be true for someone wanting to blindly embrace the notion of *** but there is nothing to show that certain elements of both are possible. This is where someone like me comes in with an open mind ready to accept both sides as having valid points and too see the limitations
The bonobo female has a brightly colored ****** used in sexual signaling, it says "mount me, I am ready!".
So why not give human females the same thing? It obviously works. Why would humans have something never seen in other life forms? My point will always be looking foward, not backward.
Did you know that the black vulture mates for life and even the other vultures sometimes attack a fellow vulture who is 'fooling around' with the wrong vulture?