A
Aratzio
Guest
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:03:14 -0500, in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Scott Campbell"
<thundering_puddles@msn.com> bloviated:
>Aratzio wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:05:45 -0500, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Scott Campbell"
>> <thundering_puddles@msn.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>> Aratzio wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:14:24 +0100, in the land of
>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay!
>>>> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for
>>>> writing:
>>>
>>> [...] Dumb & Dumber
>>>
>>>> It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking
>>>> must go through to create a world where they are anything but what
>>>> reality says they are.
>>>
>>> <wince>
>>>
>>> Not too stilted, Ratz.
>>>
>>> Why do you insist on making a no-talent like Thorne appear
>>> semi-competent by comparison? Either un**** yourself and
>>> bring some heat or go away and die painfully, you profoundly
>>> unfunny, uninteresting, uninspired hack. You'd have to work
>>> your way UP several levels of tedium just to be classified as
>>> a garden-variety dullard. Of all the weak vomit flecks
>>> inhabitating AUK, your tired, predictable, by-the-numbers
>>> efforts stand alone.
>>
>> <bugles sounds>
>> Dimmy is SAVED, Snotty to the rescue. All of alt.flame (both of em)
>> breathes a collective sigh of relief.
>>
>> But the question that must be asked, is it too little too late? Will
>> Dimmy's shorts be pulled down from the flag pole by his erstwhile
>> rescuer? What will he do with them once he has them?
>>
>> More later in this enthralling day time saga.
>
>Same old, same old, Ratz.
>
>Someone tells you what a world-class lightweight and bore you are,
>and the best you can come up with is to feebly grunt back, "Oh look!
>So-and-so is trying to help out so-and-so!" Never mind the pesky
>details that I couldn't care a whit if you stomped a hole into a no-talent
>like Thorne - or that if you applied your ignorant logic to yourself,
>then the same could be said to Mr. Plow, Ross, Sharon, Cujo, Cannon,
>or Daedalus in this very thread.
>
>Of course you'll babble some inanity about "frothing" or some such
>nonsense while failing to address your own blinding hypocrisy. AUK'ers
>are the biggest dogpilers on UseNet yet they whine like a jet engine if
>any number of folks greater than one tells them they're a collection of
>cowardly humps with no redeeming value.
>
>Kick the living **** out of Thorne if you're able to, Ratz. Just don't
>blubber about it if someone informs you that you can't flame worth
>a goddamn.
>
>Contrary to my advice, you may now proceed to blubber about it.
Right on Cue, Stumble proceeds to demonstrate his inability to ever,
even once, to vary from his standardized program.
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Scott Campbell"
<thundering_puddles@msn.com> bloviated:
>Aratzio wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:05:45 -0500, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Scott Campbell"
>> <thundering_puddles@msn.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>> Aratzio wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:14:24 +0100, in the land of
>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Timmay!
>>>> <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> got double secret probation for
>>>> writing:
>>>
>>> [...] Dumb & Dumber
>>>
>>>> It is amazing the convolutions of logic that the hard of thinking
>>>> must go through to create a world where they are anything but what
>>>> reality says they are.
>>>
>>> <wince>
>>>
>>> Not too stilted, Ratz.
>>>
>>> Why do you insist on making a no-talent like Thorne appear
>>> semi-competent by comparison? Either un**** yourself and
>>> bring some heat or go away and die painfully, you profoundly
>>> unfunny, uninteresting, uninspired hack. You'd have to work
>>> your way UP several levels of tedium just to be classified as
>>> a garden-variety dullard. Of all the weak vomit flecks
>>> inhabitating AUK, your tired, predictable, by-the-numbers
>>> efforts stand alone.
>>
>> <bugles sounds>
>> Dimmy is SAVED, Snotty to the rescue. All of alt.flame (both of em)
>> breathes a collective sigh of relief.
>>
>> But the question that must be asked, is it too little too late? Will
>> Dimmy's shorts be pulled down from the flag pole by his erstwhile
>> rescuer? What will he do with them once he has them?
>>
>> More later in this enthralling day time saga.
>
>Same old, same old, Ratz.
>
>Someone tells you what a world-class lightweight and bore you are,
>and the best you can come up with is to feebly grunt back, "Oh look!
>So-and-so is trying to help out so-and-so!" Never mind the pesky
>details that I couldn't care a whit if you stomped a hole into a no-talent
>like Thorne - or that if you applied your ignorant logic to yourself,
>then the same could be said to Mr. Plow, Ross, Sharon, Cujo, Cannon,
>or Daedalus in this very thread.
>
>Of course you'll babble some inanity about "frothing" or some such
>nonsense while failing to address your own blinding hypocrisy. AUK'ers
>are the biggest dogpilers on UseNet yet they whine like a jet engine if
>any number of folks greater than one tells them they're a collection of
>cowardly humps with no redeeming value.
>
>Kick the living **** out of Thorne if you're able to, Ratz. Just don't
>blubber about it if someone informs you that you can't flame worth
>a goddamn.
>
>Contrary to my advice, you may now proceed to blubber about it.
Right on Cue, Stumble proceeds to demonstrate his inability to ever,
even once, to vary from his standardized program.
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
immy, the Neanderthals were not tree living, they were omnivorous and