VENEZUELANS REJECT CHAVEZ'S PLANS! HEY LIEBERALS, ARE YOU PAYINGATTENTION???

[Shuurai]

> > Actually, we do have a choice. You may not like that we have a
> > choice, but that changes nothing.
>
> So how come the government has cut off funding for the Iraq War?

Which has what to do with socialism?

> How come defence contractors are being laid off?

Which has what to do with socialism?

> How come the government is freezing mortgage payments against the will of the
> Banks?

Which has what to do with socialism?

> How come Alan Greenspan is predicting a depression if the economy doesn't move
> to the left? Oh, I know, Greenspan's a communist!

Which has what to do with socialism?

That's FOUR strikes, kiddo - you got a free one and still couldn't
make a hit. I have some questions of my own: How come you are
utterly incapable with backing any argument you try to make with
relevant information? How come you keep throwing out random unrelated
snippets instead of making coherent points? How come you base
everything on black and white assumptions - communism vs. socialism?

Keep trying. Someday you're bound to say something intelligent...
you know the deal; monkeys, typewriters, time...

 

[Pierre Honeyman]

On Dec 4, 8:36 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 4:30 pm, Pierre Honeyman <pear...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 11:10 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 1:06 pm, Mark Goldberg <msgoldb...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Jerry Kraus wrote:
> > > > > I see you're a martial arts and gun freak.
>
> > > > He's a father, parent, former soldier in service to his nation, a
> > > > neighbor, a friend, a curious viewer of politics, a man who enjoys self
> > > > defense, a man who enjoys sharing his sense of security and honor with
> > > > his neighbors and colleagues.
> > > > Why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > Because you are a pimp... and he's a man.
>
> > > > > I realize the concept that people should work together to try to solve
> > > > > social problems would be difficult for someone who sees destruction
> > > > > and killing as the only useful forms of social interaction to
> > > > > comprehend, but there are, believe it or not, other ways of doing
> > > > > things.
>
> > > > > Actually, you've already lost. The only way to keep the U.S. economy
> > > > > going to move to the left -- socialism.
>
> > > > And the deaths of 150 million due to marxism, and the destruction of
> > > > their entire economies, and destruction of the principles of liberty,
> > > > all of which were rejected except by the left wing pimps who prattle...
> > > > like yourself, about nothing, nothing at all.
>
> > > > Pure vapor.
> > > > And how about the anniversary last week of the 4-10 million Stalin
> > > > starved with his collectivizations? and all the other anniversary's of
> > > > marxist economic destruction.
>
> > > > You dumb pimp, you dumbass cross posting leftist... why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > Now, now, Mark. Let's not decry your "jewish heritage". Marx was a
> > > fine philosopher and a good man. And Communism is really just applied
> > > Judaism, when properly understood. And the Chinese have done quite
> > > well with Marxism, thankyou very much.
>
> > They have? Based on what standards? Is it the wonderful standard of
> > living that the majority of Chinese live by? Perhaps, instead, it is
> > their world-renown for political, economic, and social freedoms?
> > Maybe it's the rapid pace of Chinese innovation, creating new
> > products, new techniques, new ideas for the world to benefit by? If
> > so could you maybe explain why Canada, a nation of 30M people, is
> > sending economic aid to China, a nation of over 1Bn people?
>
> > Um, hooray for Marxism?
>
> > Pierre- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> China has a GDP as large as Europe or the U.S. now.

Whee, they're only 33% of what they should be!

> They are poor,
> because they were much poorer than the west for centuries,

Oh bullshit!

> having been
> virtually a European colony. Their economy grows by 10% a year, and
> is likely to continue doing so. This is a direct result of Marxism,
> applied to a highly regulated and controlled private sector.

Again I say oh bullshit.

> Economic
> assistance is provided to all poor people in the cities who need it.
> Medical care is free.

No it isn't. Medical care is routinely paid for out of pocket by
Chinese citizens, otherwise they just don't get it.

> Disparaties of wealth are far lower than in the
> United States.

Everyone being equally impoverished is hardly something to celebrate.

> Canada is a colony of the United States with no military and huge,
> untapped natural resources. Canadians are non-entities, protected by
> the biggest bully on the block. Always have been. The Canadian
> national religion is grovelling at the feet of the biggest bully on
> the block. That's why they're sucking up to China. They see the way
> the wind's blowing.

Interesting take.

Pierre

 

[Baldin Lee Pramer]

On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
<grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> government and more socialist programs.

You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.

BLP

 

[Jerry Kraus]

On Dec 4, 12:39 pm, Pierre Honeyman <pear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 8:36 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 4:30 pm, Pierre Honeyman <pear...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 11:10 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 1:06 pm, Mark Goldberg <msgoldb...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Jerry Kraus wrote:
> > > > > > I see you're a martial arts and gun freak.
>
> > > > > He's a father, parent, former soldier in service to his nation, a
> > > > > neighbor, a friend, a curious viewer of politics, a man who enjoys self
> > > > > defense, a man who enjoys sharing his sense of security and honor with
> > > > > his neighbors and colleagues.
> > > > > Why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > > Because you are a pimp... and he's a man.
>
> > > > > > I realize the concept that people should work together to try to solve
> > > > > > social problems would be difficult for someone who sees destruction
> > > > > > and killing as the only useful forms of social interaction to
> > > > > > comprehend, but there are, believe it or not, other ways of doing
> > > > > > things.
>
> > > > > > Actually, you've already lost. The only way to keep the U.S. economy
> > > > > > going to move to the left -- socialism.
>
> > > > > And the deaths of 150 million due to marxism, and the destruction of
> > > > > their entire economies, and destruction of the principles of liberty,
> > > > > all of which were rejected except by the left wing pimps who prattle...
> > > > > like yourself, about nothing, nothing at all.
>
> > > > > Pure vapor.
> > > > > And how about the anniversary last week of the 4-10 million Stalin
> > > > > starved with his collectivizations? and all the other anniversary's of
> > > > > marxist economic destruction.
>
> > > > > You dumb pimp, you dumbass cross posting leftist... why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > > Mark
>
> > > > Now, now, Mark. Let's not decry your "jewish heritage". Marx was a
> > > > fine philosopher and a good man. And Communism is really just applied
> > > > Judaism, when properly understood. And the Chinese have done quite
> > > > well with Marxism, thankyou very much.
>
> > > They have? Based on what standards? Is it the wonderful standard of
> > > living that the majority of Chinese live by? Perhaps, instead, it is
> > > their world-renown for political, economic, and social freedoms?
> > > Maybe it's the rapid pace of Chinese innovation, creating new
> > > products, new techniques, new ideas for the world to benefit by? If
> > > so could you maybe explain why Canada, a nation of 30M people, is
> > > sending economic aid to China, a nation of over 1Bn people?
>
> > > Um, hooray for Marxism?
>
> > > Pierre- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > China has a GDP as large as Europe or the U.S. now.
>
> Whee, they're only 33% of what they should be!
>
> > They are poor,
> > because they were much poorer than the west for centuries,
>
> Oh bullshit!
>
> > having been
> > virtually a European colony. Their economy grows by 10% a year, and
> > is likely to continue doing so. This is a direct result of Marxism,
> > applied to a highly regulated and controlled private sector.
>
> Again I say oh bullshit.
>
> > Economic
> > assistance is provided to all poor people in the cities who need it.
> > Medical care is free.
>
> No it isn't. Medical care is routinely paid for out of pocket by
> Chinese citizens, otherwise they just don't get it.
>
> > Disparaties of wealth are far lower than in the
> > United States.
>
> Everyone being equally impoverished is hardly something to celebrate.
>
> > Canada is a colony of the United States with no military and huge,
> > untapped natural resources. Canadians are non-entities, protected by
> > the biggest bully on the block. Always have been. The Canadian
> > national religion is grovelling at the feet of the biggest bully on
> > the block. That's why they're sucking up to China. They see the way
> > the wind's blowing.
>
> Interesting take.
>
> Pierre- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Health care is somewhat in transition in China currently. The
government has, in the last twenty years, attempted to reduce state
spending on free medical care in the countryside. But, it is now
offering subidized services for the nominal payment of one dollar a
year to "peasants".

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/14/i...cb13755ea14446&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

 

[Jerry Kraus]

On Dec 4, 12:45 pm, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
>
> <grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> > government and more socialist programs.
>
> You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.
>
> BLP

You must remember, Mr. Pramer, that this is cross-posted to a martial
arts group. Many of the posters have suffered one too many karate
kicks to the head. They even have an autistic, dyslexic writer
posting who specializes in writing for the sub-50 IQ crowd! His
responses are limited to "your argument is ad hominem". He doesn't
seem to have anything else to say.

 

[Pierre Honeyman]

On Dec 4, 11:21 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 12:39 pm, Pierre Honeyman <pear...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 8:36 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 4:30 pm, Pierre Honeyman <pear...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 11:10 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 1:06 pm, Mark Goldberg <msgoldb...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Jerry Kraus wrote:
> > > > > > > I see you're a martial arts and gun freak.
>
> > > > > > He's a father, parent, former soldier in service to his nation, a
> > > > > > neighbor, a friend, a curious viewer of politics, a man who enjoys self
> > > > > > defense, a man who enjoys sharing his sense of security and honor with
> > > > > > his neighbors and colleagues.
> > > > > > Why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > > > Because you are a pimp... and he's a man.
>
> > > > > > > I realize the concept that people should work together to try to solve
> > > > > > > social problems would be difficult for someone who sees destruction
> > > > > > > and killing as the only useful forms of social interaction to
> > > > > > > comprehend, but there are, believe it or not, other ways of doing
> > > > > > > things.
>
> > > > > > > Actually, you've already lost. The only way to keep the U.S. economy
> > > > > > > going to move to the left -- socialism.
>
> > > > > > And the deaths of 150 million due to marxism, and the destruction of
> > > > > > their entire economies, and destruction of the principles of liberty,
> > > > > > all of which were rejected except by the left wing pimps who prattle...
> > > > > > like yourself, about nothing, nothing at all.
>
> > > > > > Pure vapor.
> > > > > > And how about the anniversary last week of the 4-10 million Stalin
> > > > > > starved with his collectivizations? and all the other anniversary's of
> > > > > > marxist economic destruction.
>
> > > > > > You dumb pimp, you dumbass cross posting leftist... why am I not surprised?
>
> > > > > > Mark
>
> > > > > Now, now, Mark. Let's not decry your "jewish heritage". Marx was a
> > > > > fine philosopher and a good man. And Communism is really just applied
> > > > > Judaism, when properly understood. And the Chinese have done quite
> > > > > well with Marxism, thankyou very much.
>
> > > > They have? Based on what standards? Is it the wonderful standard of
> > > > living that the majority of Chinese live by? Perhaps, instead, it is
> > > > their world-renown for political, economic, and social freedoms?
> > > > Maybe it's the rapid pace of Chinese innovation, creating new
> > > > products, new techniques, new ideas for the world to benefit by? If
> > > > so could you maybe explain why Canada, a nation of 30M people, is
> > > > sending economic aid to China, a nation of over 1Bn people?
>
> > > > Um, hooray for Marxism?
>
> > > > Pierre- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > China has a GDP as large as Europe or the U.S. now.
>
> > Whee, they're only 33% of what they should be!
>
> > > They are poor,
> > > because they were much poorer than the west for centuries,
>
> > Oh bullshit!
>
> > > having been
> > > virtually a European colony. Their economy grows by 10% a year, and
> > > is likely to continue doing so. This is a direct result of Marxism,
> > > applied to a highly regulated and controlled private sector.
>
> > Again I say oh bullshit.
>
> > > Economic
> > > assistance is provided to all poor people in the cities who need it.
> > > Medical care is free.
>
> > No it isn't. Medical care is routinely paid for out of pocket by
> > Chinese citizens, otherwise they just don't get it.
>
> > > Disparaties of wealth are far lower than in the
> > > United States.
>
> > Everyone being equally impoverished is hardly something to celebrate.
>
> > > Canada is a colony of the United States with no military and huge,
> > > untapped natural resources. Canadians are non-entities, protected by
> > > the biggest bully on the block. Always have been. The Canadian
> > > national religion is grovelling at the feet of the biggest bully on
> > > the block. That's why they're sucking up to China. They see the way
> > > the wind's blowing.
>
> > Interesting take.
>
> > Pierre- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Health care is somewhat in transition in China currently. The
> government has, in the last twenty years, attempted to reduce state
> spending on free medical care in the countryside. But, it is now
> offering subidized services for the nominal payment of one dollar a
> year to "peasants".
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/14/international/asia/14health.html?ex...

The Globe and Mail, earlier this year (I read it in the print edition)
was reporting on the real costs to Chinese citizens, and it was
significantly more than $1/year.

Pierre

 

[Shuurai]

> > Health care is somewhat in transition in China currently. The
> > government has, in the last twenty years, attempted to reduce state
> > spending on free medical care in the countryside. But, it is now
> > offering subidized services for the nominal payment of one dollar a
> > year to "peasants".
>
> The Globe and Mail, earlier this year (I read it in the print edition)
> was reporting on the real costs to Chinese citizens, and it was
> significantly more than $1/year.

It really depends on how you define terms like "health care" and
"costs" - for example, when you're forced to bribe a public official
for an operation, is that considered a cost?

 

[Shuurai]

On Dec 3, 11:46 pm, "Jerry B. Altzman" <jba...@altzman.com> wrote:
> on 2007-12-03 21:49 Sam the Bam said the following:
>
> > This Jerry guy is great... he's like Hal on meth.
> > Don't chase him off, ok?
>
> Wow, thanks!
> Oh wait, not me.
> Never mind.

That was a terrible haiku!

 

[David L. Burkhead]

"Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7f596029-0436-4f8a-a941-635d33f3b910@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 4, 12:45 pm, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
> >
> > <grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> > > government and more socialist programs.
> >
> > You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.
> >
> > BLP
>
> You must remember, Mr. Pramer, that this is cross-posted to a martial
> arts group. Many of the posters have suffered one too many karate
> kicks to the head. They even have an autistic, dyslexic writer
> posting who specializes in writing for the sub-50 IQ crowd! His
> responses are limited to "your argument is ad hominem". He doesn't
> seem to have anything else to say.

Your inability to read is not my problem.

Neither is your propensity to lie through your teeth.

--
David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
mailto:dburkhead@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
My webcomic Cold Servings
http://www.coldservings.com -- Back from hiatus!
Updates Wednesdays

 

[Pierre Honeyman]

On Dec 4, 11:48 am, Shuurai <Shuura...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Health care is somewhat in transition in China currently. The
> > > government has, in the last twenty years, attempted to reduce state
> > > spending on free medical care in the countryside. But, it is now
> > > offering subidized services for the nominal payment of one dollar a
> > > year to "peasants".
>
> > The Globe and Mail, earlier this year (I read it in the print edition)
> > was reporting on the real costs to Chinese citizens, and it was
> > significantly more than $1/year.
>
> It really depends on how you define terms like "health care" and
> "costs" - for example, when you're forced to bribe a public official
> for an operation, is that considered a cost?

Exactly. So, while it isn't legal, it's quite common for patients to
have to bribe their way in to see a Dr. and then to have to pay the
Dr. for their treatment. The costs are not insignificant.

Pierre

 

[Jerry Kraus]

On Dec 4, 1:51 pm, "David L. Burkhead" <dburkh...@sff.net> wrote:
> "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7f596029-0436-4f8a-a941-635d33f3b910@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 12:45 pm, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
>
> > > <grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> > > > government and more socialist programs.
>
> > > You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.
>
> > > BLP
>
> > You must remember, Mr. Pramer, that this is cross-posted to a martial
> > arts group. Many of the posters have suffered one too many karate
> > kicks to the head. They even have an autistic, dyslexic writer
> > posting who specializes in writing for the sub-50 IQ crowd! His
> > responses are limited to "your argument is ad hominem". He doesn't
> > seem to have anything else to say.
>
> Your inability to read is not my problem.
>
> Neither is your propensity to lie through your teeth.
>
> --
> David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
> mailto:dburkh...@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
> My webcomic Cold Servingshttp://www.coldservings.com-- Back from hiatus!
> Updates Wednesdays- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

David, apparently you're an applied physicist. You may, for all I
know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
"writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
Sorry.

Anyone can, of course, get some articles and stories published if they
spend enough money and time trying to do so. I'd rather just have
whatever I want to say disseminated on the internet. Which isn't to
say I haven't published a few things in print from time to time. But,
it's not much of a business, as you are, I suspect, aware.

 

[Shuurai]

On Dec 4, 11:28 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 3:49 pm, "Herbert Cannon" <hcanno...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Chavez is basically an idealist in an uncertain position. He's a
> > > potential Castro, but Castro wasn't really that bad a fellow either.
> > > His options were limited.
>
> > Why no, of course not, he really was a really good fellow, he just murdered
> > the oppostion; and he just recently locked up the dissidents. Not a bad
> > fellow at all, if you like living in communist dictatorships. If you dont
> > you float.
> > What utter bullshit.
>
> > He did the best he could.>
>
> > I would say he did a pretty good job of murder.
>
> > > Once we get rid of Bush and implement some economic reforms
> > > domestically, South America will restabilize, and the temptations of
> > > Communism will recede.
>
> > Yes and the world will turn nice and fuzzy and warm; and the terrorist will
> > all turn into hippies: and we can all surrender our arms; and we can disband
> > our armies; and Islam will be a peaceful religion; and everyone will love
> > everyone; and I have some bridges and some plots of land to sell you - the
> > snake oil I throw in for free.
>
> > As I say, my nickname for Bush is "Instant
>
> > > Communism".
>
> > My nickname for you is moron. Unless of course you want to buy my plots of
> > land, then I will call a dumb customer.
>
> > He makes Communism look good, as an alternative to
>
> > > imperialistic fascism.
>
> > Gee that must be why we are having a presidential election in the future
> > because we are a imperialistic fascist. The Bush Brown shirts are under your
> > bed.
>
> Castro doesn't kill people. The U.S. does. Castro has no Gulag, the
> U.S. does.

Are you sure you know who Castro is?

> Despite being a poor country, average life expectancy is
> just as high in Cuba as in the U.S.

There is a difference between life expectancy and quality of life. If
you don't believe me, go live in Cuba for a while.

> Cuba is a paradise compared to
> Mexico. You don't see any Cubans escaping to "Freedom in Mexico".

But you DO see both Cubans and Mexicans escaping to the United
States. Why do you think that's so? Why do so many Cubans risk their
lives to come to America when, according to you, it's just as good
there as here? They have the same "life expectancy" right? Why don't
we ever hear about Americans flocking to Cuba? According to you, they
have just as much reason to do so as the Cubans have of coming here...

Seems you might be full of ****, son. Again. Go figure.

 

[Jerry Kraus]

On Dec 4, 1:59 pm, Shuurai <Shuura...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 11:28 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> But you DO see both Cubans and Mexicans escaping to the United
> States. Why do you think that's so? Why do so many Cubans risk their
> lives to come to America when, according to you, it's just as good
> there as here? They have the same "life expectancy" right? Why don't
> we ever hear about Americans flocking to Cuba? According to you, they
> have just as much reason to do so as the Cubans have of coming here...
>
> Seems you might be full of ****, son. Again. Go figure.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Because the U.S. is rich from military imperialism, you moron!!!! WE
STEAL FROM THE ENTIRE WORLD!!!

 

[ChristiaNazism]

We (USA) were 1 (one) SCJOTUS from having a Dictatorship (from the) RIGHT
here in America...the Dems regaining in the House and Senate was a bigger
victory than most will ever realize...

Sandra Day O'Connor warned Americans as such...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4728508

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0313-03.htm

http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/SandraDayOconnor.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1729396,00.html

http://www.yuricareport.com/Law & Legal/OConnorWarnsOfDictatorship.html

--
At the RNC incest is priority-one because that's how the GOP got started, all
the way back to the Virgin Birth

 

[Mike]

On Dec 4, 2:56 pm, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David, apparently you're an applied physicist. You may, for all I
> know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
> "writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
> Sorry.

Shut it puppy.

-Mike K.

 

[Mike]

On Dec 4, 3:01 pm, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Because the U.S. is rich from military imperialism, you moron!!!! WE
> STEAL FROM THE ENTIRE WORLD!!!

So you are saying that people come here from other countries to become
thiefs.

That's got to be what you are saying, because otherwise it's crap.

-Mike K.

 

[David L. Burkhead]

"Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f8ab50ef-3203-4778-bb7f-5647d225e3f6@j44g2000hsj.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 4, 1:51 pm, "David L. Burkhead" <dburkh...@sff.net> wrote:
> > "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
> >
news:7f596029-0436-4f8a-a941-635d33f3b910@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 4, 12:45 pm, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
> >
> > > > <grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> > > > > government and more socialist programs.
> >
> > > > You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.
> >
> > > > BLP
> >
> > > You must remember, Mr. Pramer, that this is cross-posted to a martial
> > > arts group. Many of the posters have suffered one too many karate
> > > kicks to the head. They even have an autistic, dyslexic writer
> > > posting who specializes in writing for the sub-50 IQ crowd! His
> > > responses are limited to "your argument is ad hominem". He doesn't
> > > seem to have anything else to say.
> >
> > Your inability to read is not my problem.
> >
> > Neither is your propensity to lie through your teeth.
> >
> > --
> > David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
> > mailto:dburkh...@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
> > My webcomic Cold Servingshttp://www.coldservings.com-- Back from hiatus!
> > Updates Wednesdays- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> David, apparently you're an applied physicist. You may, for all I
> know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
> "writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
> Sorry.

You're opinion on that matter is completely without merit: as you
demonstrate every time you set fingers to keyboard.

> Anyone can, of course, get some articles and stories published if they
> spend enough money and time trying to do so.

I see the publishing industry is something else you are completely
ignorant about.

> I'd rather just have
> whatever I want to say disseminated on the internet. Which isn't to
> say I haven't published a few things in print from time to time.

Name _one_ in a professional, commercial publication--where they pay
_you_, not the other way around.

You see, in every one of the pieces I mention it was the publisher that
paid me, not me paying the publisher.

Among professional writers there's a saying "the only place a writer
signs a check is on the back."

Here's a nice starting point for learning a bit about the subject:
http://www.sfwa.org/beware/

> But,
> it's not much of a business, as you are, I suspect, aware.

A number of my friends would disagree with you: they make their living
writing.

That you are not aware of this speaks volumes about your
credibility--and not to your credit.

--
David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
mailto:dburkhead@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
My webcomic Cold Servings
http://www.coldservings.com -- Back from hiatus!
Updates Wednesdays

 

[David L. Burkhead]

"Mike" <mkornecki2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:50233b59-8c41-44b4-9a7c-d04d596a5d29@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 4, 2:56 pm, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > David, apparently you're an applied physicist. You may, for all I
> > know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
> > "writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
> > Sorry.
>
> Shut it puppy.

Let him rant on. With every movement of his mouth, his foot goes
farther and farther down his throat. I want to see if he pulls an Igli.

--
David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
mailto:dburkhead@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
My webcomic Cold Servings
http://www.coldservings.com -- Back from hiatus!
Updates Wednesdays

 

[Shuurai]

> David, apparently you're an applied physicist.

Jerry, apparently you're an idiot.

> You may, for all I know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
> "writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
> Sorry.

And you can?

> Anyone can, of course, get some articles and stories published if they
> spend enough money and time trying to do so.

So where are yours? Anyone can do it, right?

> I'd rather just have whatever I want to say disseminated on the internet.

Sure; because the internet has no standards or expectations. It's the
only place where someone like you CAN have your words disseminated.

> Which isn't to say I haven't published a few things in print from time to time.

Which isn't to say that you have.

> But, it's not much of a business, as you are, I suspect, aware.

Especially when you're only lying about it on usenet...

 

[Jerry Kraus]

On Dec 4, 2:20 pm, "David L. Burkhead" <dburkh...@sff.net> wrote:
> "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f8ab50ef-3203-4778-bb7f-5647d225e3f6@j44g2000hsj.googlegroups.com...> On Dec 4, 1:51 pm, "David L. Burkhead" <dburkh...@sff.net> wrote:
> > > "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7f596029-0436-4f8a-a941-635d33f3b910@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > On Dec 4, 12:45 pm, Baldin Lee Pramer <baldinpra...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 3, 7:35 am, Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin
>
> > > > > <grandmastersenseishao...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > The Lieberals need to be paying attention since they love more
> > > > > > government and more socialist programs.
>
> > > > > You are too stupid to have an opinion on this.
>
> > > > > BLP
>
> > > > You must remember, Mr. Pramer, that this is cross-posted to a martial
> > > > arts group. Many of the posters have suffered one too many karate
> > > > kicks to the head. They even have an autistic, dyslexic writer
> > > > posting who specializes in writing for the sub-50 IQ crowd! His
> > > > responses are limited to "your argument is ad hominem". He doesn't
> > > > seem to have anything else to say.
>
> > > Your inability to read is not my problem.
>
> > > Neither is your propensity to lie through your teeth.
>
> > > --
> > > David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
> > > mailto:dburkh...@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
> > > My webcomic Cold Servingshttp://www.coldservings.com--Back from hiatus!
> > > Updates Wednesdays- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > David, apparently you're an applied physicist. You may, for all I
> > know, be quite a good physicist. But, by presenting yourself as a
> > "writer", you really do yourself a disservice. You can't write.
> > Sorry.
>
> You're opinion on that matter is completely without merit: as you
> demonstrate every time you set fingers to keyboard.
>
> > Anyone can, of course, get some articles and stories published if they
> > spend enough money and time trying to do so.
>
> I see the publishing industry is something else you are completely
> ignorant about.
>
> > I'd rather just have
> > whatever I want to say disseminated on the internet. Which isn't to
> > say I haven't published a few things in print from time to time.
>
> Name _one_ in a professional, commercial publication--where they pay
> _you_, not the other way around.
>
> You see, in every one of the pieces I mention it was the publisher that
> paid me, not me paying the publisher.
>
> Among professional writers there's a saying "the only place a writer
> signs a check is on the back."
>
> Here's a nice starting point for learning a bit about the subject:http://www.sfwa.org/beware/
>
> > But,
> > it's not much of a business, as you are, I suspect, aware.
>
> A number of my friends would disagree with you: they make their living
> writing.
>
> That you are not aware of this speaks volumes about your
> credibility--and not to your credit.
>
> --
> David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
> mailto:dburkh...@sff.net "While we live, let us live."
> My webcomic Cold Servingshttp://www.coldservings.com-- Back from hiatus!
> Updates Wednesdays- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

David, you SURE AS HELL don't make your living writing. And YOU
NEVER WILL.

Everything is relative. There is a bit of money in writing. But not
much.

Actually, if you want to talk about lasers, something you may know
something about, that might be of some interest.