phreakwars

How is THAT free when you are mandated to BUY into it? . .

Yeah, this guy is absolutely right... Go ahead and name all those great socialist programs where the wealthy are losing what is their's and it's being given away to the greedy poor. I mean, if it's what you and the idiot and the video want to claim, then SURELY you can give us some fine examples. . .

Why, just so you can talk more sh!t about his looks and stuff? Oh no, I wouldn't do that. I'm a liberal remember... we accept people no matter how ugly & deformed they are, we don't cast them out like right wingers would.

So I'm a socialist, big deal, it's just a label... can't say I view it as a bad thing. And who said FREE, I just said do the right thing and help, even if it costs me personally. What socialist legislation? Name all those socialist programs he proposed. I want in on all this wealth spreading and other peoples money that he's been giving away. He didn't compromise at all, he sucked cock and gave his Republican party whatever they want without even trying to negotiate. . .

If it wasn't for a progressives we wouldn't have advancements in science and medicine. You'd still be waiting around for some invisible man to cure you. It's all part of that one track mind that stays focused on the same thing over and over and over. . .

In all seriousness though... you gonna post some pics? . .

Cameras keep breaking every time you try getting in the pic, eh? Poor kid, hopefully he looks like his mother and not your side. . .

Good call by the judge. I'm glad they found that Republican introduced mandate unconstitutional.. Of course, TJ will fire back that "NO WAY, THE REPUBLICANS DIDN'T DO THAT" Guess again bub. Like a fucking socialist Democrat would EVER introduce a PRO-BIG BUSINESS provision requiring people buy someone else's shit? You know, like ROMNEY CARE. I love how the Republicans watered down health care reform, the mandates were one of the things they demanded be tossed in... then even after that, they never voted for it. . .

There TJ goes with his typical bullshit... you just want the government to do this, you just want the government to do that... entitlements, socialism and yadda yadda yadda.. So WHAT EXACTLY is it I want the government to do for me or anybody else? I don't recall EVER saying they should do anything except help sick people. Oh the shame of it all, wanting to do like Jesus would do and help others who are sick. And WOW, I'm even willing to let the government take more of what I have to help someone else. And without getting anything back in return for it. Sorry TJ, you will never EVER spin that to make your right wing ideals of "fuck em, it's mine it's mine and you can't have it" sound any better. . .

I'd say this study show conservatives, without a doubt, have a one track mind and are not open to new ideas and concepts. I'll give conservative credit for being loyal.... stupid loyal. So loyal they will defend the idiots of their own party rather then do the right thing and speak out against them. Defend people and concepts who are wrong just because the rest of the pack says so. Lucky for us lefty types, if someone in the herd fucks up, we call them on it. Conservatives on the other hand, will go into denial mode rather then ever admit or accept they are wrong. Now WHO is it again that are sheeple? . .

Very typical of you B e n d e r, good to see you never let up, even for a second I got a rep to protect. B)

Greedy for other peoples money? Are you out of your fucking mind? I want MY OWN taxes to go up, I'd get nothing from it at all. Why? Because unlike you, who claims to be fiscally responsible, I actually am. I want the debt paid down. You on the other hand, are in favor of raising it all so you can have your tax cut entitlement welfare. Keeping the tax cuts in place is NOT a fiscally responsible thing to do. It DOES NOT create jobs. If it did, you'd answer the question about why we didn't have job growth in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, etc, etc. . .

I hope he turns out gay. . .

I see instead of answering the question, you just jump into a blame game response. As proven by this: You STILL haven't answered the question WHAT WAS THE EXCUSE BEFORE OBAMA EVEN RAN. Doesn't matter, it's STILL just an excuse, The Republican President Obama has proven time and time again to LOVE big business. Just like IWS your trying to claim The old "FREDDIE AND FANNIE" did it excuse which does NOT answer why the industrial sector fell when Freddie & Fannie are HOME LENDERS, not business lenders. No matter how much you want to spin it, it doesn't change the fact that business loans were secured by banks, not Freddy & Fanny. Doesn't matter if the banks did have any stakes in those 2, they didn't have their arms twisted. Fannie & Freddie were secured by the government, not banks., try again. Certainly not the wealthy, as proven by 10 years of tax cuts, 8 of which under Bush with no fear of those "evil democrats" raising taxes. So common TJ, what the excuse for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. You can't blame Obama, you can't blame home lenders. Hell, even if you COULD blame them, explain 2002, 2003, 2004, etc, etc.. when they just kept running wild and STILL never created jobs. None of this Fannie & Freddie shit came to light till about 2007. . .

BLAH BLAH BLAH As far as the Bush tax cuts are concerned, try to consider "WHO" creates jobs. BLAH BLAH BLAH What jobs? They had 10 years to create them, they never did.. and now the excuse is... well, we can't create them because of the uncertainty our taxes will go up... BULLSHIT.. What's the excuse for not creating them before Obama even took office, before the guy even ran. If those tax cuts were so damn great, we wouldn't have elected Obama in the first place. And again WHAT JOBS? . .

I wanna know WHO supports it. What Senator put his name on it wanting to give the wealthy tax cuts they neither want, nor need. Who was it that said it would be a great idea and fiscally responsible to borrow a few billion more from China. . .

I wish they would bring back Bill and get rid of that Republican DINO who now holds office. . .

Well, thanks for the OPINION piece from answerology.com written in 2009, but lets look at the reality: http://money.cnn.com...nies/autosales/ GM, Ford post sales gains while Toyota struggles NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Auto sales in November were significantly improved from the dismal results posted a year ago by automakers, but remain near historic lows.Taking seasonal sales swings into account, the sales rate for November works out to annual sales of 12.3 million vehicles, the highest rate since the cash for clunkers sugar rush of August 2009. And it's also just about the level of sales needed to replace broken down cars being taken off the road, a sign of lackluster demand. GM sales were up 11% year over year, while Ford came through with a nearly 20% rise. Toyota's sales eased 3.2%. The overall numbers are an encouraging sign that the recovery is taking hold, and consumers are once again confident enough to purchase big ticket items, said Jesse Toprak, vice president of industry trends at TrueCar.com. Then there is also THIS recent piece: http://www.salon.com..._signs_continue If you need more, there is also THIS search: http://www.google.com/search?q=Cash+for+Clunkers+Results&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=nws:1,qdr:m&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=L20DTZeVO8qcnwfux-HlDQ&ved=0CBkQpwU . .

In the 70's, Pell grants for instance, covered 100% of your tuition cost for 2 years, now it covers what? 50%-60? Your talking about k-12, I'm talking about higher education. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I could have sworn jobs that are geared towards advancements in technology and science, require a little bit more then just a high school diploma. Also, if your into all that bookworm stuff, here's a GREAT read that I read about a year ago: http://www.amazon.co...l/dp/080701138X I think I still have it here around the house somewhere in the boxes of books my wife rarely throws out. I'll be happy to borrow it to you. It's not a very big book, only like 200 pages or so. Very interesting read and perspective though. As for K-12, the problem there isn't the funding, the problem there is what is being taught and at what levels. The Chinese for instance, have 3rd grade aged kids doing algebra. English is taught as a second language to 6 year olds. Did you know, there are more people in China who speak English then there are Americans who speak it. It's things like that, that give them an edge, and it's a sobering reality that some people either aren't aware of, or don't want to believe. . .

What's sad, is thanks to defunding, todays generation, is actually dumber then the last. Not a good position to be in when you owe money to China and their kicking your ass in education and technology advancements. . .

I see you didn't read them. The hell I didn't, I see you read them, but made something out of it that isn't there... an excuse for losing the job sector. Bottom line, the BANKS ( you know, the guys we bailed out and keep pressuring to start lending again) had control of the job lending, not Freddie or Fannie, don't care how much you wanna spin it and try blaming them, it's simply not so. The only reason right wingers keep it up and keep it up with the "BLAME FREDDIE AND FANNIE" BS is because it wasn't a Republican program, and it was headed by a gay congressman. Complete frikken political rhetoric. . .

What the hell was THAT? All those links linked to is shit about the mortgage financial crisis, which has NOTHING to do with business shutting down. What, did bosses fire employees who couldn't make mortgage payments? Did banks forclose on business' because they were bad business deals made to people who bought homes? GET REAL MAN. There is one VERY huge hole in the whole Fannie and Freddie did it theory... FANNIE AND FREDDIE ARE HOME LENDERS, NOT BUSINESS LENDERS. That Fannie and Freddie meme is horse shit Republican blame game talk about something completely unrelated to America losing it's industrial sector. The banks could have very easily switched liquid assets into the industrial sector and avoided the housing sector, but they didn't, they got greedy. The REAL problem is wage inequality which resulted in Americans losing valuable income to actually make payments on shit. Losing money to afford to buy shit to keep other business afloat, that is pretty damn obvious I don't care what your politics are. . .

The housing bubble is the reason we lost millions of jobs? Yeah right.. explain that one. Explain to me how bad home loans resulted in companies shutting down. THIS I gotta hear. . .

[attach=full]1579[/attach]

[attach=full]1578[/attach]