Jump to content

phreakwars

Members
  • Posts

    7,330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Everything posted by phreakwars

  1. Hell, I spend more time on facebook and other sites then I do here. TJ seems to have it in his head that I'm at my PC clicking the damn refresh button waiting for responses, and if I don't respond to him, that somehow I am avoiding him.. uh NO, I have a REAL life, I work, I cook, I clean, I live. The last thing I do is care about somebody babbling on and on 10,000 lines of shit I could REALLY in all reality, care less about. So I just ignore shit if I see the same ole same ole rant that I see on all the other sites. TJ just happens to be a master of parroting shit. So I ignore him, and many others. I find I'm happier that way. . .
  2. Register at the backup site and you'll see the forum http://suckagelite.byethost32.com/
  3. Who said anything about the government getting involved? . .
  4. So who making less then $250,000 a year is taxed higher? Hell, who OVER $250,000 is currently taxed higher?
  5. Admit I'm wrong about your faith? Hell you won't even acknowledge the bible tells you to be a socialist. Just one of those passage you want to interpret for your own selfish needs regardless of what it really says. . .
  6. OK, that's the PLAN, so then why isn't that PLAN in action right now? So who making less then $250,000 a year is taxed higher? Hell, who OVER $250,000 is currently taxed higher? Don't try the smoker and tanners bullshit, that is an OPTIONAL tax. It isn't forced on anybody. . .
  7. First of all, read the passage again, it says ALL of your shit, not just a couple can of beans to the food bank.. tell me it DOESN'T say that. And second Republicans created welfare. Not Obama, the question was: So what has been taken from the rich and given to the poor? Where is all this socialist wealth spreading? I want some too. That was a reference to the current administration, not what has been going on for decades.. .
  8. So you support Islam?
  9. Still crying I see. . .
  10. The question was: If your so convinced that Obama's tax plan has already been implemented, why is congress still debating letting the Bush Tax cuts expire? . .
  11. So answer for Deuteronomy-14:28, 29 At the end of every third year you shall bring out all the tithes of your produce for that year and deposit them in community stores, Do YOU do that? Hey, it's the phrase YOU mentioned. So what has been taken from the rich and given to the poor? Where is all this socialist wealth spreading? I want some too. . .
  12. Oh, so you don't want to answer the question... I see. . .
  13. If your so convinced that Obama's tax plan has already been implemented, why is congress still debating letting the Bush Tax cuts expire? . .
  14. They hate the suckage for it's freedoms.
  15. The Suckage has been Hi-Jacked by Muslim cyber-terrorists!!! They have declared Jihad on the Suckage.
  16. Backup domain is up and running at http://suckagelite.byethost32.com You'll need to register a name . .
  17. Have you ever messed with someones account eddo? nope. sure haven't. YOU LIE !!! [attach=full]3040[/attach]
  18. You didn't break any rules. I just needed a guinea pig to test out the permission changes I made on the idiot box. And well, I needed an idiot to test it out on and you were the only one available... nothing personal. Yep. That pretty much sums it up. Yeah, I kinda thought so too. But look on the bright side, at least I gave you an avatar and title under your name that fit's your personality, so you REALLY can't complain too much. HINT: The more you complain, the longer I'll be motivated to keep you under "IDIOT" status. . .
  19. Told ya I could do worse, you shouldn't encourage me. :woot: . .
  20. Well, at least your living up to the title under your avatar. :lol: Emkay should be happy, your sig is shorter. . . . .
  21. I actually love it I knew you would. B) . .
  22. Looks just like the old one, except the hair is shorter and the mustache is gone so you can see what's underneath. Check it out: [attach=full]3039[/attach] . TWINS!! . .
  23. By complaining he's only encouraging me to do worse. :whistling: . .
  24. Deuteronomy-14:28, 29 Socialists Numbers-18:24 Let's put that in context: Matthew 6:1-4 Footnotes from the vatican: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/__PVF.HTM 1 [1-18] The sermon continues with a warning against doing good in order to be seen and gives three examples, almsgiving (? Matthew 6:2-4), prayer (? Matthew 6:5-15), and fasting (? Matthew 6:16-18). In each, the conduct of the hypocrites (? Matthew 6:2) is contrasted with that demanded of the disciples. The sayings about reward found here and elsewhere (? Matthew 5:12, ? 46; ? 10:41-42) show that this is a genuine element of Christian moral exhortation. Possibly to underline the difference between the Christian idea of reward and that of the hypocrites, the evangelist uses two different Greek verbs to express the rewarding of the disciples and that of the hypocrites; in the latter case it is the verb apecho, a commercial term for giving a receipt for what has been paid in full (? Matthew 6:2, 5, ? 16). 2 [2] The hypocrites: the scribes and Pharisees, see ? Matthew 23:13, ? 15, ? 23, ? 25, ? 27, ? 29. The designation reflects an attitude resulting not only from the controversies at the time of Jesus' ministry but from the opposition between Pharisaic Judaism and the church of Matthew. They have received their reward: they desire praise and have received what they were looking for. 1 Timothy 5:3-16 Footnotes from the vatican: http://www.vatican.v...0839/__P113.HTM After a few words of general advice based on common sense (? 1 Tim 5:1-2), the letter takes up, in its several aspects, the subject of widows. The first responsibility for their care belongs to the family circle, not to the Christian community as such (? 1 Tim 5:3-4, ? 16). The widow left without the aid of relatives may benefit the community by her prayer, and the community should consider her material sustenance its responsibility (? 1 Tim 5:5-8). Widows who wish to work directly for the Christian community should not be accepted unless they are well beyond the probability of marriage, i.e., sixty years of age, married only once, and with a reputation for good works (? 1 Tim 5:9-10). Younger widows are apt to be troublesome and should be encouraged to remarry . .
  25. Still no answer? . .
×
×
  • Create New...