timesjoke

I have never dodged a single question, I may miss one every now and then when several are asked at the same time but just remind me and I will always answer to the best of my ability. I can point to several direct questions I have asked liberals that they refuse to answer, such as what in Obama's past qualifies him to be an executive of the largest economy in the nation in relationship to proven skill as someone who has championed reforms to prove he can follow through with his promises of reform and executive skill in changing Washington? Well you certainly danced all around the question but in my opinion, you still dodged it. First of all your 303 million number is a completely made up number, you cannot have all people having access if all do not have guns. A very small percentage of homes have "legal" guns in them so in order to make a reasonable comparison with numbers you have to use "real" numbers, not fantacy numbers. Out of the "legal" guns owned, what number are used in criminal activities? Do you even know? Your claim of limiting gun ownership is possible harm, my possition against abortion is the actual abortions. If we compare the number of legally owned guns that are used in a criminal act to the number of children killed in the womb each year, what do you think we will come up with? About 1.2 to 1.4 million children are killed in the womb each year, just one year. About 6,000 legally owned guns are used in the commission of a crime each year, the numbers are not even comparable if we stay in the realm of reality. Now, at the same time let's look at how many times legally owned guns are used for protection or to "stop" crime: The World Wide Web Gun Defense Clock You may want to get educated on the issues so you do not look so bad. So, the number of abortions greatly outnumbers the possible illegal gun use, hundreds of times to one when put into factual context. So while you attempted to offer a 'partial' answer to the question, your facts were all wrong and you were relying on 100% assumption as the basis of your arguement. I will let IWS field this because it was his question, not mine so maybe he will think you gave a real answer but I do not believe you did.

Being as eddo already clearly pointed out your attacks on Sarah with your negative assumptions, I will just answer your other point with my comment: "Being as your so trapped on looks I can only figure you have none. But, looks are not everything, even if your outward appearance is less than stellar, you have shown here that it is your insides that are truly ugly." It may sound like I was attacking your appearance but in reality if you read the entire statement, the context of your assault on Sarah's looks is my question, not a statement of your looks and possible motivations. The first part I underlined has as it's context your obsessive attacks on Sarah Palin's looks, from that attack I am actually asking a question, raising concern to your motivation and my first impression as to a possible cause for you being so harsh tword Sarah. To see my true intent for my post you have to read the entire comment and see the second part I underlined. I said even "if" your outward appearance...... "If" is the key word, should I post the definition of "if"?

I never said you were ugly, I just pointed out you seem preoccupied with her looks for some reason. This 'could' be because you see yourself as not measuring up to her but there are many other reasons you could be obsessed and just picking her looks as the first easy target. And how do you know I don't? I remember almost every discussion I have ever had, I am very focused on what I am saying and know what other people are saying as well. Your the one who tried to come bragging about how Emkay was supporting you against me but it blew up in your face. It looks like you need to slow down and consider what your saying before you hit the submit button. So your fast as a bullet to judge Sarah Palin as a slut or bad woman without even one piece of evidence to prove it but now you want to complain I am judging you unfairly? You keep comming back to her beauty and how you think what is important is if she would ever date me or something but again, I am not judging on her looks or her availability to me for sexual gratification. I am only judging her on her accomplishments and possitions for the job she is being considered for. To me things like her looks and sexual availability are irrelivant to her doing the job, why is it you, a woman, can only see her looks and are completely ignoring her qualifications?

Then there is the sources of information used, if these sources are book by people like Dawkins, that is definate brain washing. I still go back to their hostility. I am not forcing my belief on them but they want to force religion out of my life. Athiests use demeaning names and attack everything about religion from every direction. I have no problem with thei religion, all I ask is to leave mine alone, stop trying to destroy it just because you don't like it. This is why they both refuse to check out that link Phantom offered, they are afraid of the facts, they need their blind faith that their belief structure is right and everyone else is wrong to feel better about themselves.

Play the numbers 1,2,3,..... Now we are back to trying to attack the motivation of the question asker. Complaining about being labeled. Crying about the amount of questions being asked of liberals, claiming it is unfair to even ask the questions. Here is what I find interesting about this latest line of "your not fair" to us bull...... I am a hard line conservative, I am secure in my views and can easily accept the burdon of being put down by everyone on this forum (like now) without even blinking. I stick to my guns and keep to the topic no matter how much I am attacked. If you feel in your heart your right, it does not matter how many are against you. But Liberals require greater numbers, they need to drown out the opposition or even silence it because they know they are doing the wrong thing and understand that if too much light is placed on their actions/beliefs, people may start getting wise to their games. Call me a coinservative and I am proud, call a Liberal what they are and they say it is an insult. One of those things that make you go hmmmmmm.

Exactly, all I did was mention that a gorls like this one selling her virginity may get a positive boost by having a woman like Sarah as the VP. I mentioned some of these qualities you just mentions and Chi ripped into me trying to compare her to other women she had hear rumors about that were PTA members but fooling around. Chi kept trying to say that pretty women could not possibly earn their place in society. There is definately some kind of hangup with Chi against Sarah and her looks, otherwise Chi would not keep going back to it over and over. If women want men to see past their looks and judge them only by their work, then maybe women should start doing that themselves first.

They only want these rights for themselves, not anyone who does not agree with them. That is why they blast Palin on things like her never having an abortion and calling her a step backwards for all women if she gets elected.

I just said I was not interested in the gang thing, it was you who pressed me to explain further. You should be happy I am trying not to piss my fellw members off at least in one way, man I just can't do right even when I am trying to be considerate............

Depending on the study you want to give the most strength too the numbers for 'declared' Americans is in the ballpark of what Anna posted, I believe where your comming from is how the actual elections turn out reguardless of party numbers. Many people may join one party or another for many reasons to even include what party their family belongs to but when it coms time to actually vote, their leanings many times are more to the center. McCain is the most liberal Republican I have ever known, he has been involved in many cooperative measures with liberals over the years (and was my main reason I was not thrilled to have him represent me) and he beat out more hard line conservative people. The primary elections are usually dominated by those more hardlined or radical in the party, this is why Obama did so well against Hillary. The general elections tend to have more people involved and the true centered feelings start to come out and show. That is why the polls are changing and Obama is waffling on his possitions based on these same polls. If your campaign is all about the polls, you can be very frustrated when the more radical views start to wane and the true feelings start showing up as the general election starts to get closer. I have watched this process time and time again.

Many whites like having their own water fountains and even seperate places to sit at a dinner. They desired to be kept seperate from that they hated/feared. The liberals desire their politics to be kept seperate from them the same way and for similar reasons. Why own up to your mistakes and abuses as long as you have the ability to play these games, to duck and dodge and even attack those who are asking the direct questions. Play it by the numbers 1,2,3,.......but never answer the question.

Palin Says Voters Coping With ?Do-Nothing Senate? on Energy - America?s Election HQ While all the liberals are wasting time talking about her tanning bed or how she has never had an abortion, Sarah Palin is tackling the issues head on. This is the difference between her and Obama, she offers real substance and unblinking solid committments to actions. Obama has been quoted as waffling on several of his possitions so who knows what he honestly believes. To me he seem like he believes whatever the polls tell him to believe from day to day.

lol, you clean history every time you close? What is up with that? Going places you don't want the wifey to know about? Well, assuming you actually got to the site and your not just making stuff up as Anna alludes to, you had to get there somewhere. I have most of the statistic sites I use all on favorite tabs. If what you used was just a random site you don't know anything about, well I would not have used it until I was sure they were not offering a biased study anyway.

But anyone who followed behind me would be like a hotdog tossed down a hallway, people would really be pissed at me then I can only imagine the changed name you would give me at that point.

Go to your history tab, the site will be there.

No, I am saying if your in the middle of a gangbang you will be like used baggage by the time I get to be there so that is not very enticing to me, I am a more 1 on 1 kind of guy.

1,2,3,..... Follow the liberal guide to 'NOT' answer any liberal possition by the numbers, repeat each step as much as neccessary but never, never answer the question. Right now we are back at calling your motives into question again, it is a repeating cycle.

Let's just say I am not into the heavily used gals, lol.

Thanks for straightening that out, Chi was trying to make it sound like you were supporting her attack on Sarah Palin and myself, good to know your not that petty.

I have some aussie members on my board, they understand these issues better then you might think. Her first comments showed her understanding and was the basis of my comment, I did carefully look at what she said and how she said it before I commented. Look, you made a great first post, it was clear and had an honest question with depth and comparison to show the spirit of your question. It was no fault of your post that they did what they did, it is their mindset that does not allow questioning of their issues, so your a bad person for even asking. That is why your honest and clear question was dodged and made fun of, why they called into question your motives, and pulled the "I'm offended" card.

Well the Bingo card took him out at the knees, they hate it when you prove how programmed they are. An interesting point is every successful society has had at the least a general shared belief in (some form of) religion. There is not one successful society of Athiests. They represent an existence more like a parasite, feeding on a successful society while at the same time trying to destroy the foundation of what made their existence possible.

Wow, now that was skill, answer the question and still not answer it at the same time, I have to tip my hat on that one, I cannot play with words that well. Of course the only way that reply works is if she is saying she does not know the true Liberal stand on these two issues. We know she does from her other comments so if we compare all the comments made, we see she still completely dodged both the question and the spirit of the conversation. A true master.

That is their plan, they have no intention of answering the question. A great day indeed. Too bad many do not respect the constitution these days, it gets in too many people's way to transform America into a socialist state.

As I said about someone else, an idiot calling me an idiot is a double negative, that means I am a genious. All I have to do is let you guys keep talking and sooner or later you prove your true colors and I get to smile my knowing smile. You just proved how petty and insignificant you truly are with this post. I can care less how many of you believe assuming something negative about Sarah without proof is reasonable, I do not associate with 'sewing circles' where rumor and innuendo are all it takes to judge a person as a slut.

I already knew about most of this info, but the guy did a great job of laying it out for any idiot to understand that something "must" be done. I am sending this to several of my friends.

I have been saying that for years, look how openly hostile they are about everything 'not' liberal. Look at the mess here, I stopped caring anything about this 'question' after the first dodge by Bender and his following personal attacks to change the subject away from something he was ashamed of. I am now just posting from auto pilot and laughing at how typical he is, he even changed my tag under my name. The funny part is I love it, being called an idiot by an idiot is a double negative, that makes me a genious, lol. Besides, that also proves they see themselves as above the rules, they tell everyone else not to make personal attacks but they do it all the time, "do as I say, not as I do". Very typical liberal behavoir.