NO EVIDENCE OF GODS

On Feb 18, 8:57�am, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2007 07:53:50 -0800, in alt.atheism
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> <1171814030.140365.45...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 17, 10:32?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> >> Bill M wrote:
> >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:1171521149.118439.271150@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Feb 14, 9:21?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
> >> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >> > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> >> > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >> > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> > > >> > ...
>
> >> > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
> >> > > >> > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
>
> >> > > >> > Source with complete context please.
>
> >> > > >> You'll never get it, not anything genuine.
>
> >> > > >> Our religious kook might give you a forgery, as David Barton did in
> >> > > >> his book.
>
> >> > > forged quote of Lincoln is making its rounds in usenet at>> this very
> >> > > moment.
 
On Feb 18, 9:05�am, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2007 08:00:59 -0800, in alt.atheism
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> <1171814459.115538.174...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 17, 11:02?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >> > On Feb 17, 12:23?pm, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> >> > > On 17 Feb., 13:22, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Feb 16, 2:05?pm, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > On 16 Feb., 04:57, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:> rbwinn wrote:
> >> > > > > > > On Feb 15, 2:52?am, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > On 15 Feb., 00:54, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:> On Feb 13, 11:48?pm, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > snip
>
> >> > > > > > > > > Well, let's get right to it. ?In what way do you acknowedge that the
> >> > > > > > > > > Bible exists? ?Bob has a list that he keeps posting. ?Does the Bible
> >> > > > > > > > > exist the same way something on Bob's list exists?
>
> >> > > > > > > > And the twit continues to make a fool of himself.
> >> > > > > > > So what is the cause of your reluctance to answer the question? ?Bob
> >> > > > > > > has a list of evil spirits that he claims exist in the world. ?Does
> >> > > > > > > the Bible have an existence like something on Bob's list or is the
> >> > > > > > > Bible tangible?
>
> >> > > > > > You must be some kind of fool.
>
> >> > > > > Apparently he is insane. ?We are not going to get a rational response
> >> > > > > out of him; it is just not in him.
>
> >> > > > > snip
>
> >> > > > Well, the poor little atheists do not want to answer questions about
> >> > > > their beliefs.
 
On Feb 18, 10:09�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 10:32�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > > Bill M wrote:
> > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:1171521149.118439.271150@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Feb 14, 9:21?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>
> > > > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
>
> > > > > >> > ...
>
> > > > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
> > > > > >> > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
>
> > > > > >> > Source with complete context please.
>
> > > > > >> You'll never get it, not anything genuine.
>
> > > > > >> Our religious kook might give you a forgery, as David Barton did in
> > > > > >> his book.
>
> > > > > forged quote of Lincoln is making its rounds in usenet at>> this very
> > > > > moment.
 
On Feb 19, 8:18�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 10:37�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > On Feb 14, 4:44�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
>
> > > > > ...
>
> > > > > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell.
 
On Feb 20, 8:03�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> jl wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 12:41 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > Well, here is a scripture from Isaiah.
 
On Feb 20, 9:17�pm, Enkidu <fox_rgf...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in news:1172030782.372449.111750
> @s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2:22?pm, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:51:17 -0500, "D...@V.A." <d...@bellsouth.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >Mormonism and Jehovah witnesses are extremes, far out in their
> beliefs
> >> >and practices. Several Mormon groups in Utah, Arizona Montana and
> >> >other states still practice polygamy. This is abuse of women and
> their
> >> >offspring. A practice condemned by all Christians.
>
> >> Not by two Christian sects - Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses.
>
> > Atheists are the ones who are the greatest abusers of women.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> Pulled that out of you ass, didn't you?
>
> --
> Enkidu AA#2165
 
rbwinn wrote:

> On Feb 15, 9:18�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Feb 14, 9:21�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > > > >> > ...
> >
> > > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell.
 
On Feb 20, 9:18?pm, "D...@V.A." <d...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172030782.372449.111750@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...> On Feb 20, 2:22?pm, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:51:17 -0500, "D...@V.A." <d...@bellsouth.net>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >Mormonism and Jehovah witnesses are extremes, far out in their beliefs
> > > >and practices. Several Mormon groups in Utah, Arizona Montana and
> > > >other states still practice polygamy. This is abuse of women and their
> > > >offspring. A practice condemned by all Christians.
>
> > > Not by two Christian sects - Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses.
>
> > Atheists are the ones who are the greatest abusers of women.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> We were informed by the two Mormon missionaries that if we reject
> this Joseph Smith we could not be saved into the presence of
> God. Only Mormons can enter into the presence of God.
> (who btw is just an exalted man who once lived on a planet
> and died was resurrected and progressed into godhood)

I wouldn't really think so.
Robert B. Winn
 
Pastor Frank wrote:

> "bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:45DA5B7E.D6BEBE26@netvigator.com...
> >
> > No gods needed or indeed exist,
> > simply man's primitive needs - they exist all right !
> >
> Our Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16) become fully manifested

Matthew 10:35.
"For I came to SET A MAN AGAINST HIS FATHER,
AND A DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER,
AND A DAUGHTER-IN-LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER-IN-LAW"

that is how silly ot all gets Frank


>
> in
> Jesus Christ giving His life for us sinners on the cross of Calvary. We
> therefore know our God and have seen Him. (Jesus in John 14:6-10)
> Atheists don't know our God and therefore cannot see Him.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On Feb 20, 11:22�pm, Darrell Stec <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com>
wrote:
> After serious contemplation, on or about Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:03
> pm rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 6:36?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> In alt.atheism On 15 Feb 2007 18:35:15 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >On Feb 15, 5:00?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> In alt.atheism On 14 Feb 2007 22:24:28 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >On Feb 14, 8:19?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com>
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 14 Feb 2007 15:25:25 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >On Feb 13, 7:22?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Feb 13, 8:05 pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:> In alt.atheism On 13 Feb 2007 16:59:35 -0800,
> >> >> >> >> "rbwinn"
>
> >> >> >> >> ...]
>
> >> >> >> >> Did you notice that nowhere in the Old Testament is the
> >> >> >> >> messiah predicted to be god? (e messiah is prophesied to
> >> >> >> >> bring peace, to bring comfort to the wretched, to heal the
> >> >> >> >> earth; but nowhere in the Old Testament does it say he will
> >> >> >> >> be worshiped as a god.
>
> >> >> >> >Isaiah 9:6
>
> >> >> >> ?? See Is 8:3. That is the child spoken of in Is 9:6.
>
> >> >> >No, sorry.
>
> >> >> ?? ?? Sorry, but it's true. Only if one takes Is 9:6 completely
> >> >> out of context can it be applied to jesus. Will you admit to
> >> >> taking Is 9:6 completely out of context?
>
> >> >> Don
>
> >> >Well, let's work over to it, Don. ??
>
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? No, there's no working over to it. The fact is that the
> >> child born in Is 8:3 fills the prophecy from Is 7:14 and is being
> >> lauded from Is 8:5 on, continuing through Is 9.
>
> >> ?? ?? ?? ?? Interesting note: if you read Is 9:1-2 and then find Matt
> >> 4:12-16, you'll see how the former verses were concatenated to invent
> >> a prophecy that doesn't actually exist.
>
> > Well, as an apostle, Matthew certainly had the authority to say what
> > Isaiah meant by his prophecy.
> > So what is your authority to say that Matthew was concatenating
> > something?
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> One does not need an authority to see what can be easily demonstrated by
> reading the two passages oneself.
 
On Feb 20, 11:29�pm, Darrell Stec <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com>
wrote:
> After serious contemplation, on or about Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:58
> pm rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 9:28?am, Darrell Stec <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com>
> > wrote:
> >> After serious contemplation, on or about Tuesday 20 February 2007
> >> 7:40 am rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 20, 4:41?am, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> >> >> Darrell Stec wrote:
> >> >> > After serious contemplation, on or about Sunday 18 February 2007
> >> >> > 10:59 am rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>
> >> >> > > I feel better already. ??Here is a verse from Isaiah to
> >> >> > > brighten your day.
>
> >> >> > Which Isaiah? ??You realize that there were at least four people
> >> >> > or schools writing under the name of Isaiah and throughout
> >> >> > several centuries don't you? ??Isaiah is a composition by many
> >> >> > not the work of one man.
>
> >> >> "... the Bible was a collection of books written at different
> >> >> times by different men, a strange mixture of diverse human
> >> >> documents, and a tissue of irreconcilable notions. Inspired? The
> >> >> Bible is not even intelligent. It is not even good craftsmanship,
> >> >> but is full of absurdities and contradictions."
> >> >> [E. Haldeman-Julius, "The Meaning Of Atheism"]
>
> >> > Sorry, Darrell, no one can fake writing like Isaiah. ??He was the
> >> > only one who wrote the way he wrote.
> >> > Robert B. Winn
>
> >> How can you make statements like that? ??You can't read the Hebrew it
> >> was written in. ??Even several of my bibles explicity state that
> >> Isaiah was written by a minimum of three different schools or
> >> persons. ??The grammar and syntax varies in style (and content) among
> >> those writers. You can't read the originals, nor understand the fine
> >> nuances of the Hebrew language. ??Can you name any real biblical
> >> scholar of today who shares your viewpoint?
>
> >> Your own LDS scholars do not agree with you. ??Note: "John Tvedtnes,
> >> senior project manager for FARMS, has written technical studies on
> >> Hebraisms and Isaiah variants in the Book of Mormon." which can be
> >> found athttp://www.apologeticsindex.org/cpoint10-2.html.
>
> >> --
> >> Later,
> >> Darrell Stec ?? ?? ??dars...@neo.rr.com
>
> > I do not really care what some college boys think.
 
On Feb 21, 5:49�am, "jl" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 11:06 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
 
rbwinn wrote:

> On Feb 18, 8:57�am, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > On 18 Feb 2007 07:53:50 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > <1171814030.140365.45...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >On Feb 17, 10:32?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > >> Bill M wrote:
> > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > >> >news:1171521149.118439.271150@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > >> > On Feb 14, 9:21?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > >> > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > >> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > >> > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > >> > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > >> > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > >> > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > >> > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > >> > > >> > ...
> >
> > >> > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
> > >> > > >> > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
> >
> > >> > > >> > Source with complete context please.
> >
> > >> > > >> You'll never get it, not anything genuine.
> >
> > >> > > >> Our religious kook might give you a forgery, as David Barton did in
> > >> > > >> his book.
> >
> > >> > > forged quote of Lincoln is making its rounds in usenet at>> this very
> > >> > > moment.
 
rbwinn wrote:

> On Feb 18, 10:09�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > rbwinn wrote:
> > > On Feb 17, 10:32�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > > > Bill M wrote:
> > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:1171521149.118439.271150@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > On Feb 14, 9:21?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > > > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > > > > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
> > > > > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> > > > > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> > > > > > >> > ...
> >
> > > > > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
> > > > > > >> > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
> >
> > > > > > >> > Source with complete context please.
> >
> > > > > > >> You'll never get it, not anything genuine.
> >
> > > > > > >> Our religious kook might give you a forgery, as David Barton did in
> > > > > > >> his book.
> >
> > > > > > forged quote of Lincoln is making its rounds in usenet at>> this very
> > > > > > moment.
 
On 22 Feb 2007 19:19:49 -0800, in alt.atheism
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
<1172200789.128447.246440@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>:
>On Feb 18, 8:57?am, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2007 07:53:50 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> <1171814030.140365.45...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Feb 17, 10:32?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
>> >> Bill M wrote:
>> >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:1171521149.118439.271150@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > On Feb 14, 9:21?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> > > On 14 Feb 2007 18:59:33 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> >> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> >> > > <1171508373.435033.309...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >> > > >On Feb 14, 5:24?pm, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> > > >> On Feb 14, 6:44 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > >> > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> >> > > >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> >> > > >> > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >> > > >> > ...
>>
>> >> > > >> > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
>> >> > > >> > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
>>
>> >> > > >> > Source with complete context please.
>>
>> >> > > >> You'll never get it, not anything genuine.
>>
>> >> > > >> Our religious kook might give you a forgery, as David Barton did in
>> >> > > >> his book.
>>
>> >> > > forged quote of Lincoln is making its rounds in usenet at>> this very
>> >> > > moment. 4 recommends hunting down and hanging anyone
>> >> > > >> critical of the war effort.
>>
>> >> > > pundit has already confessed that he is
>>
>> >> > > >> the author of the quote.
>>
>> >> > > >> The fraud was perpetrated by one of the Moonie rags, either the Moonie
>> >> > > >> Times or that bag of internet lies called _Insight Magazine._
>>
>> >> > > >Well, why don't you atheists just wait until after the resurrection
>> >> > > >and ask Abraham Lincoln in person if he believed the Bible?
>> >> > > >I see no reason to worry about it myself.
>>
>> >> > > Because you know that you have absolutely no evidence at all that there
>> >> > > is going to be a resurrection, yet you keep trying to duck questions
>> >> > > with your silly incantation.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > Jesus Christ was resurrected. (at is all the evidence we need.
>> >> > Robert B. Winn
>>
>> >> > You do not seem to understand the difference between a claim, a fable and
>> >> > objective verifiable evidence!
>>
>> >> He only accepts what his mummy told him, forgetting that her mummy told her
>> >> and then her mummy told her and 'ad infinitum' - well not exactly, as sooner
>> >> or later we reach back to a small group of primitives that made the myth up in
>> >> the first place.
>>
>> >> It's s hard to accept the fact that one's parents and grandparents were
>> >> telling unsubstantiated yarns - maybe for the best possible reasons, but
>> >> 'yarns' nevertheless- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >So when Jesus Christ said that he was not the offspring of monkeys,
>> >you claim that he was telling a "yarn"?
>>
>> Since Jesus never said that, you are the one telling a tall tale. Still,
>> when it comes to science, it doesn't really matter what someone claims
>> Jesus said. The people who were writing these stories about Jesus had no
>> idea about common descent or evolution. I would be impressed with the
>> Bible if it had actually talked about it, but it doesn't.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Well, actually, it does. Paul stated that in the last days men would
>be turned to fables, being unable to abide sound doctrine.

Since you teach things that have no evidence to back them, why would I
think your teachings are sound doctrine?
 
On 22 Feb 2007 19:53:52 -0800, in alt.atheism
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
<1172202832.147991.191490@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>:
>On Feb 19, 8:18?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>> > On Feb 18, 10:37?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
>> > > rbwinn wrote:
>> > > > On Feb 14, 4:44?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> > > > > On 14 Feb 2007 15:16:18 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> > > > > <1171494978.705022.208...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> > > > > ...
>>
>> > > > > >Well, that is a myth that atheists like to tell. incoln said on
>> > > > > >several occasions that he believed the Bible.
>>
>> > > > > Source with complete context please.
>>
>> > > > I can give you the original source. alk to Abraham Lincoln after the
>> > > > resurrection. e can tell you in person.
>> > > > Robert B. Winn
>>
>> > > I am seriously thinking of <plonking> you for the third time - what a
>> > > wally- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > Well, here is a verse from Isaiah. o need to get irrational.
>> > Isaiah 2:17
nd the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the
>> > haughtiness of men shall be made low: and the Lord alone shall be
>> > exalted in that day.
>> > Robert B. Winn
>>
>> Nothing could be MORE irrational than quoting ad infinitum,
>> verses from an old book written by one primitive out of a gaggle of
>> primitives
>>
>> Grow up- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>How about this? Here is someone who thinks that his ancestors were
>monkeys telling me to grow up.

We do share our ancestry with the great apes, all other mammals and the
rest of the organisms in the world. Only liars claim otherwise.
 
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:04:41 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45de4c6b$0$16288$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>news:s4dkt21p4jn6vu6o6k3821agnkthmhg5ou@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:18:14 +0800, in alt.atheism
>> "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
>> <45d8c8bc$0$16329$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>>>
>>>And which has as it's central theme: "There ain't no god(s)"?
>>
>> I don't say that. I state that there is absolutely no evidence for any
>> gods. You choose to falsely claim that I have said something else.
>>
> That's an outright lie!!! Our Christian "God is love" and there is
>plenty of evidence for the existence of love. YOUR god or devil doesn't
>exist, for it is likely to be an invisible old man in the sky.

You know your argument relies on falsely conflating two different
meanings of the word _love_.
 
Pastor Frank wrote:

> "bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:45DA5C6A.E7847B7B@netvigator.com...
> >
> > Lunacy exists, as anyone reading your posts quickly discovers
> >
> What about you claiming there ain't no god(s), when it's obvious that
> there are existing gods aplenty? You are obviously into "lunacy" yourself.

Carvings do not gods make.

OED - 'GOD' A superhuman being that is worshipped as having power over
nature

Kindly grow up and stop posting painfully stupid waffle about 'gods a plenty'
we know
man made 'em all, which more than we can say about your 'point'!

Better sill; accept that you are staggering up a one way alley
- a 'blind alley'.

[Just imagine how nice it would be to wake up tomorrow morning and find that
you no longer need to scrape away at that bottomless barrel of yours for more
excuses.]



>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
rbwinn wrote:

> On Feb 16, 2:19�pm, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> > On 16 Feb., 15:20, "jls" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Feb 15, 8:57 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Feb 15, 7:01?am, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> >
> > snip
> >
> >
> >
> > > > You forgot about Isaiah.
> > > > Isaiah 1:4
 
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:28:00 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45de4c70$0$16288$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>news:bedkt25jc2k340fjstt9r0ftctvkun83ns@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:36:48 +0800, in alt.atheism
>> "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
>> <45d8c8cc$0$16329$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point. So you disbelieve what I just said, as
>>>usual, and are now claiming that atheism is a belief system, instead of a
>>>disbelief system. Let's see you prove that. Either prove it, or admit
>>>your
>>>just lying for atheism again.
>>
>> You are the one who calls atheism a belief system. I call you on your
>> lie. Atheism is not a form of belief. Lack of belief is not a system.
>> You know that. You appear to like lying. Why is that?
>>
> Why is what? You proved no "lie". I agreed with you above, that atheism
>is not a belief system. It's however a DISbelief system, for you are forever
>listing all the things you don't believe and never get around to telling us
>anything about what you DO believe.

More nonsense. The point, which you dishonestly refuse to acknowledge,
even though people have provided it to you again and again, is that
atheism is not any sort of system. One can be atheist and a follower of
the Buddha or Confucius or even Jesus. Atheism says nothing about the
moral principles one follows (of course we also know that many people
claim to be Christian, but that says nothing about their moral
principles, either).
 

Similar threads

R
NO EVIDENCE OF ANY GODS
Replies
5
Views
18
Richo
R
B
A CHALLENGE FOR RELIGIONISTS
Replies
6
Views
18
Steve Hayes
S
B
FALSE GODS
2 3
Replies
55
Views
56
bob young
B
B
EVIDENCE OF NO REAL GOD
Replies
4
Views
21
Christopher A.Lee
C
B
GOD MYTHS AND FABLES
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
71
bob young
B
Back
Top