NO EVIDENCE OF GODS

[Pastor Frank]

"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:l597u2lni8032lkjd0nvt0im7q0k0gpfec@4ax.com...
> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
> <rbwinn3@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> What is there to argue about? We
>>have freedom of religion here in the United States. You are free to
>>be an atheist if that is what you want to be. You decided to try some
>>profanity on me.
>
> No, since there's no such thing. And I told you what it means
> to argue style-over-substance, which is what you did.
> Don aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
> Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
>
Typical atheists to always know what there isn't, but being clueless as
to what there is. So now we are told thet there "is no such thing" as
profanity, and according to atheists dictionaries and Bibles are lying, for
only atheists know the truth, ...only privately so however, for they can't
seem to evidence this truth.
> "No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
> Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:9g97u2t6qngtqnvmq96kdjocfaeprsi3fp@4ax.com...
> On 26 Feb 2007 19:11:21 -0800, in alt.atheism
> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
> <1172545881.572790.37170@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
>>On Feb 26, 6:01 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>> On 25 Feb 2007 17:30:16 -0800, in alt.atheism
>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>>> <1172453415.648942.236...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
>>> >
>>> >An accusation from an atheist does not change reality.
>>> >Robert B. Winn
>>>
>>> You've made a claim that you cannot support. You've made prior claims
>>> that are demonstrably wrong. It is appropriate and necessary to let
>>> people know that you are untrustworthy. Your claim to be religious does
>>> not change that.- Hide quoted text -
>>> -
>>Spoken like an atheist. You have said that our freedom depends on
>>permission from atheists. No, sorry, our freedom has nothing to do
>>with you or your corrupt philosophies. Jeswus Christ was the one who
>>said we were free.
>
> You mock Jesus with your absurd claims and intentional lies.
>
You forgot again to quote the evidence of this "mock" nor prove any
"absurd claim" nor "lie". That means you are still out to lunch (pun
intended). But then atheists generally think of themselves akin to God, i.e.
infallible in their judgment and needing neither evidence nor proofs for any
of their assertions.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:si97u2dnesiglif5hpsh73dmvn2v5a3ufv@4ax.com...
>
> Do you have evidence that perjury was committed or are you just telling
> us stories the way you do when you make things up with your religious
> beliefs?
>
"Making things up" now with you atheist beliefs or rather disbeliefs?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172554391.178023.233210@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 6:01?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>> You've made a claim that you cannot support. You've made prior claims
>> that are demonstrably wrong. It is appropriate and necessary to let
>> people know that you are untrustworthy. Your claim to be religious does
>> not change that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> Do whatever you decide to do. The United States is a free country.
> What you do means nothing to me.
> Robert B. Winn
>
But atheist definition, only atheists are "trustworthy". LOL But then
Christ came for them, who are lost, not for us who are found.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1172554645.503230.296520@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> On 22 feb, 17:08, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>> "Free Lunch" wrote in
>> messagenews:8vnpt2dbg15v1o4t4gi1od6t5c2d1r8el6@4ax.com...
>> >
>> > There is no evidence for God or Satan or any other gods of Christianity
>> > or any other religions.
>>
>> I respect this as a tenet of your belief that you religiously adhere to
>> and
>> evangelistically proclaim.
>
> You shouldn't
> If you disagree, you should produce the evidence.
> You do not, therefore I suspect you agree.
> Peter van Velzen
> February 2007
> Thung Song
> Thailand
>
You haven't been around much, or you would know that there are gods
aplenty in our museums and libraries, containing both concrete and abstract
gods. In Thailand you will find people having altars stocked with gods of
all kinds.
What atheists mean is: There are no gods of atheist definition, and we
theists tend to agree with them.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172556377.226916.64810@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:20�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> Yet the Bible that you worship approves of slavery. Why do you disagree
> with the Bible?- Hide quoted text -
>
I don't worship the Bible. Paul's instructions on the subject were to
a slave who had run away from a church member who had slaves and to
the slaveowner himself. His concern at the time was to prevent an
outbreak of runaway slaves that would bring persecution on the
church. Paul was not in favor of slavery.
Robert B. Winn
>
No need to explain nor defend, for the atheist hasn't proved his case
for you "worshipping the Bible", nor that "the Bible approves of slavery".
Those are just bait to keep you from mentioning the name above all names,
our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[jl]

On Feb 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
> "bob young" <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote in message
>
> news:45DE75BE.81EF8CFF@netvigator.com...
>
>
>
> > Pastor Frank wrote:
>
> >> Our Christian "God is love" and there is nothing "pitiful" about
> >> love.
> >> Nor does love "lie". If atheism is not a philosophy of life, then why are
> >> you wasting your life arguing against our philosophy of life, unless you
> >> think your philosophy of life is better?
> >> You just got yourself all muddled again.
>
> > You are the muddled one,
> > 'He' was supposed to have sent his only begotten son down to earth and
> > then had
> > him ascend up to a heaven somewhere [just above the clouds back then]
>
> > 'Love' alone can do that?
> > GROAN
>
> So you want to be a literalist. Let's see you interpret the Biblical
> poetic format constructively. And no Jesus didn't just become weightless and
> float like a helium filled balloon up and away into the sky. LOL

You are correct. The bones of Jesus, Joseph, Mary, Jesus's wife, Mary
Magdalene, and Jesus's son Judah were just found in some ancient
crypts in Jerusalem.

One religion down, one to go, as soon as they find the filthy bones of
Mahomet the Paedophile.

 

[stumper]

Pastor Frank wrote:
> <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
> news:1172554645.503230.296520@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> On 22 feb, 17:08, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in
>>> messagenews:8vnpt2dbg15v1o4t4gi1od6t5c2d1r8el6@4ax.com...
>>>> There is no evidence for God or Satan or any other gods of Christianity
>>>> or any other religions.
>>> I respect this as a tenet of your belief that you religiously adhere to
>>> and
>>> evangelistically proclaim.
>> You shouldn't
>> If you disagree, you should produce the evidence.
>> You do not, therefore I suspect you agree.
>> Peter van Velzen
>> February 2007
>> Thung Song
>> Thailand
>>
> You haven't been around much, or you would know that there are gods
> aplenty in our museums and libraries, containing both concrete and abstract
> gods. In Thailand you will find people having altars stocked with gods of
> all kinds.
> What atheists mean is: There are no gods of atheist definition, and we
> theists tend to agree with them.
>

I guess you have done this thousands of times.
But humor me and tell me one more time, please.

What is your definition of your god(s)?

--
~Stumper

 

[Day Brown]

jl wrote:
> Very interesting comment and a pleasure to read.
Well thanx; I so often see flaming.

> I agree that the xian religion is an authoritarian design. Xianity
> by its nature attracts tyrants and promotes a planet of the apes
> dullness in its followers.
Another pleasure for me to read was Robin Lane Fox, "The Christians
and the Pagans" about the transformation of the empire in the mere 60
years from Constantine to Justinian. One of the things he reports that
rings bells is how the elders felt the young people, who had adopted a
new religion, were damned. Families were very distressed with members
having such different cosmologies.

Marriages broke up and children were disowned. Lotsa wealthy women
had kookie ideas and funded groups meeting in obscure locations. The
activities were almost always trivial, but the stories about what went
on fueled the anxiety. Its remarkable when you think of how the
established religion existed for uncounted centuries, yet in just a
couple generations, a cult grew to take over the whole system.

And as you say, has been useful to tyrants and oligarchs ever since.
Course, there are a lotta stupid people out there, who as Gibbon
commented, would believe damn near anything. Caesar said the Gauls
were slaves to uncertain reports, and he circulated a lot of them in
taking over. So, now, we have the net, full of uncertain reports, and
drivel written by and for the dullest of followers.

I cant tell whether the net will make a difference or not now with
people that are so stupid and crazy. But the rest of us dont need to
meet in catacombs. Its lots easier to exchange ideas on what to do. I
see the preference for consensus, but events can get out of hand
really quickly before there is time to organize resources for mutual
benefit.

Do you have a plan if the economy tanks?

 

[jl]

On Feb 28, 6:09 pm, "Day Brown" <daybr...@hughes.net> wrote:
[...]
> Do you have a plan if the economy tanks?

Yes, subsistence farming, if necessary. Survivor here.

 

[Free Lunch]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:01:50 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45e5e38b$0$16375$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
><pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
>news:1172554645.503230.296520@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> On 22 feb, 17:08, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in
>>> messagenews:8vnpt2dbg15v1o4t4gi1od6t5c2d1r8el6@4ax.com...
>>> >
>>> > There is no evidence for God or Satan or any other gods of Christianity
>>> > or any other religions.
>>>
>>> I respect this as a tenet of your belief that you religiously adhere to
>>> and
>>> evangelistically proclaim.
>>
>> You shouldn't
>> If you disagree, you should produce the evidence.
>> You do not, therefore I suspect you agree.
>> Peter van Velzen
>> February 2007
>> Thung Song
>> Thailand
>>
> You haven't been around much, or you would know that there are gods
>aplenty in our museums and libraries, containing both concrete and abstract
>gods. In Thailand you will find people having altars stocked with gods of
>all kinds.
> What atheists mean is: There are no gods of atheist definition, and we
>theists tend to agree with them.

It would be interesting if you could point to evidence that those who
have these statues think that the statues themselves are the gods rather
than representations of the gods.

 

[Free Lunch]

On 28 Feb 2007 04:00:05 -0800, in alt.atheism
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
<1172664005.690889.184180@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>On Feb 27, 8:27?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On 27 Feb 2007 19:06:15 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> <1172631975.817817.307...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Feb 27, 6:59?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> On 26 Feb 2007 22:06:17 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> >> <1172556377.226916.64...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >> >On Feb 26, 8:20?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> >> On 26 Feb 2007 19:08:45 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> >> >> <1172545725.523360.319...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >> >> >On Feb 26, 5:32 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On 25 Feb 2007 17:23:09 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> >> >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> <1172452989.091439.309...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >> >> ...
>>
>> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scott case that a runaway slave
>> >> >> >> >had to be returned to his owner if he fled to another state. (at was
>> >> >> >> >the last Supreme Court ruling on slavery. / now you are saying that
>> >> >> >> >the Supreme Court has made another erroneous decision. %ll, that
>> >> >> >> >does not really surprise me.
>>
>> >> >> >> What an absurd claim. At the time, the decision was correct, even though
>> >> >> >> it was absolutely repugnant from the modern viewpoint for almost all
>> >> >> >> Americans. The Congress and states changed the Constitution so that the
>> >> >> >> Dred Scott case is no longer valid.
>>
>> >> >> >> You really have no idea what you are talking about, whether in religion
>> >> >> >> or law. I would not be surprised based on your behavior here if you were
>> >> >> >> an ignorant blowhard in other areas of knowledge as well.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >If you want to return runaway slaves, that would be your choice.
>>
>> >> >> You, of course, know you are making an utterly absurd claim.
>>
>> >> >> >My opinion is that you have no right to try to practice slavery.
>>
>> >> >> Yet the Bible that you worship approves of slavery. Why do you disagree
>> >> >> with the Bible?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >I don't worship the Bible. !ul's instructions on the subject were to
>> >> >a slave who had run away from a church member who had slaves and to
>> >> >the slaveowner himself. )s concern at the time was to prevent an
>> >> >outbreak of runaway slaves that would bring persecution on the
>> >> >church. aul was not in favor of slavery.
>>
>> >> So you reject the teachings found in the Old Testament and you deny that
>> >> the Southern Baptists and all other proponents of slavery in 1860 were
>> >> Christian.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >Well, if Satan has put that accusation in your mind, then it is in
>> >your mind along with whatever other accusations Satan has put there.
>> >Too bad that is all you have in your mind.
>>
>> I have no reason to believe that Satan exists. No evidence supports your
>> claim that he did anything or even that he does exist.- Hide quoted text -
>Well, here is another atheist claiming that evil does not exist in the
>world.

Hoe many times will I have to remind you that I have not said that and
that you are lying when you recharacterize my comments that way? Why
should I bother with your repeated dishonesty? Why should anyone here
think that you are remotely a follower of Jesus when lies fall from your
posts so easily?

>According to atheists, whatever happens is good except for
>those things done by Christians.

Another one of your unlimited reservoir of lies. What a waste.
--

"Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel
to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy
Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should
take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in
which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh
it to scorn." -- Augustine, The Literal Meaning of Genesis

 

[Free Lunch]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:26:52 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45e5e381$0$16375$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>news:dp87u2puojrjnf1cm9nnjsi0mi2cc56msv@4ax.com...
>> On 26 Feb 2007 19:08:45 -0800, in alt.atheism
>> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
>> <1172545725.523360.319420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
>>>On Feb 26, 5:32 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>> On 25 Feb 2007 17:23:09 -0800, in alt.atheism
>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>>>> <1172452989.091439.309...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>>> >The Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scott case that a runaway slave
>>>> >had to be returned to his owner if he fled to another state. That was
>>>> >the last Supreme Court ruling on slavery. So now you are saying that
>>>> >the Supreme Court has made another erroneous decision. Well, that
>>>> >does not really surprise me.
>>>>
>>>> What an absurd claim. At the time, the decision was correct, even though
>>>> it was absolutely repugnant from the modern viewpoint for almost all
>>>> Americans. The Congress and states changed the Constitution so that the
>>>> Dred Scott case is no longer valid.
>>>>
>>>> You really have no idea what you are talking about, whether in religion
>>>> or law. I would not be surprised based on your behavior here if you were
>>>> an ignorant blowhard in other areas of knowledge as well.- Hide quoted
>>>> text -
>>>>
>>>If you want to return runaway slaves, that would be your choice.
>>
>> You, of course, know you are making an utterly absurd claim.
>>
>>>My opinion is that you have no right to try to practice slavery.
>>
>> Yet the Bible that you worship approves of slavery. Why do you disagree
>> with the Bible?
>>
> Quote please! Where does the Christian NT Bible "approve of slavery"?

Not only does Paul approve of slavery, but he expects women to act as if
they are slaves as well.

 

[Free Lunch]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:11:54 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45e5e37c$0$16375$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
>news:1172545881.572790.37170@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 26, 6:01 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> You've made a claim that you cannot support. You've made prior claims
>>> that are demonstrably wrong. It is appropriate and necessary to let
>>> people know that you are untrustworthy. Your claim to be religious does
>>> not change that.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> Spoken like an atheist. You have said that our freedom depends on
>> permission from atheists. No, sorry, our freedom has nothing to do
>> with you or your corrupt philosophies. Jeswus Christ was the one who
>> said we were free.
>> Robert B. Winn
>>
> Exactly right. Our rights and freedoms rest in God, not in the law nor
>in the courts, nor constitution, nor in government etc. That means they
>cannot be recinded by man.

So why are the most virulently radical American 'Christians' the ones
who are willing to let President Bush destroy our civil liberties?

 

[Free Lunch]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:47:35 +0800, in alt.atheism
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in
<45e5e387$0$16375$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
>news:si97u2dnesiglif5hpsh73dmvn2v5a3ufv@4ax.com...
>>
>> Do you have evidence that perjury was committed or are you just telling
>> us stories the way you do when you make things up with your religious
>> beliefs?
>>
> "Making things up" now with you atheist beliefs or rather disbeliefs?

I asked a question because Mr. Winn has proven that he is unreliable. If
you had bothered to follow his postings, you would know that he
cheerfully lies about many items.

 

[Pastor Frank]

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172556961.386584.45770@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:25�pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
> I don't. I just think it's amusing how childish you are.
>
I have never thought you were amusing. And you are not childish. You
are evil.
Robert B. Winn
---------

These insults are just refuting ploys by Satan's minions to make people
STOP talking about Jesus. Will we let them? Hell NO!!!! We will shout His
most holy and perfect name from the roof tops if need be, and no atheists
are going to stop us!!!!!



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[Pastor Frank]

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172557079.541789.112280@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:26�pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
>
> No, since there's no such thing. And I told you what it means
> to argue style-over-substance, which is what you did.
>
There is no such thing as profanity? So now not only the Bible does
not exist, but also profanity does not exist.
Robert B. Winn
------------

That nothing a religionist talks about exists, is one of atheism's most
sacred doctrines.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

[rbwinn]

On Feb 28, 6:56�am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> In our last episode,
> <1172664408.045323.104...@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>,
> the lovely and talented rbwinn
> broadcast on alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 5:11?am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> >> In our last episode,
> >> <1172662555.211807.27...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>,
> >> the lovely and talented rbwinn
> >> broadcast on alt.atheism:
> >> > You Europeans
>
> >> OH? ?You are not as European as I am? ?Or is "Winn" a slave name?
>
> >> > buy into every lie that becomes popular. ?Your archeology in this instance
> >> > is about as reliable as the rest of your archeology. ?The body of Jesus
> >> > was resurrected.
>
> >> If by resurrected you mean about to become the foundation of an apartment
> >> building, you are right.
>
> > I am not as European as you are.

 

[rbwinn]

On Feb 28, 7:57�am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 20:41:53 -0800, "rbwinn"
> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 27, 8:31?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 18:59:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >On Feb 27, 6:43?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:17:59 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >On Feb 26, 8:26?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >On Feb 26, 7:11 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:51:34 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:17?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:34:07 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:49?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:02:16 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:09?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>

 

[rbwinn]

On Feb 28, 7:58�am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 20:29:26 -0800, "rbwinn"
> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 27, 8:31?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 18:55:55 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >On Feb 27, 6:42?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:16:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >On Feb 26, 8:25?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:50:36 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >On Feb 26, 7:09 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:50:25 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:16?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:32:15 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:47?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:04:58 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:10?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 22 Feb 2007 19:31:53 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Well, here we have another statement from an atheist denying the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >existence of the Bible.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> /, that's not what we have. We only have that if you, Bobby,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> do not understand English. Are you admitting that you do not
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> understand English?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >You first, Don.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> ( please, Bobby. IKYABWAI is so kindergarten.
> >> >> >> >> >> >So don't try it on me.
>
> >> >> >> >> >>