NO EVIDENCE OF GODS

On 27 Feb 2007 22:39:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <45E506EE.9105CA58@netvigator.com>
>
>
>Don Kresch wrote:
>
>> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:16:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> <rbwinn3@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >On Feb 26, 8:25?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:50:36 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >On Feb 26, 7:09 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:50:25 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>> >>
>> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:16?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:32:15 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:47?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:04:58 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:10?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 22 Feb 2007 19:31:53 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Well, here we have another statement from an atheist denying the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >existence of the Bible.
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> o, that's not what we have. We only have that if you, Bobby,
>> >> >> >> >> >> do not understand English. Are you admitting that you do not
>> >> >> >> >> >> understand English?
>> >> >> >> >> >You first, Don.
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Oh please, Bobby. IKYABWAI is so kindergarten.
>> >> >> >> >So don't try it on me.
>> >>
>> >> >> >> IKYABWAI followed with IKYABWAI is really childish.
>> >>
>> >> >> >Well, you can stop doing it any time, Don.
>> >>
>> >> >> Wow--you did it a 3rd time!
>> >>
>> >> >> Sheesh--how childish are you?
>> >> >I don't see why you would want to base your life on what I do or don't
>> >> >do.
>> >>
>> >> I don't. I just think it's amusing how childish you are.
>> >>
>> >I have never thought you were amusing.
>>
>> That's because I'm educational.
>>
>> > And you are not childish.
>>
>> That's because I don't believe in god. The upshot is that
>> those who believe in god are childish.
>
>I have held the same view now for over fifty years

There is another option, apart from possessing the mind of a child:
being completely bonkers!

--
 
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:31:58 -0600, Don Kresch
<ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
- Refer: <prt9u2hbeqhm3vbq6fa6ao1hp3qndssc94@4ax.com>
>In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 18:59:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
><rbwinn3@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
>>On Feb 27, 6:43?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:17:59 -0800, "rbwinn"
>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >On Feb 26, 8:26?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
>>> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>>
>>> >> >On Feb 26, 7:11 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:51:34 -0800, "rbwinn"
>>> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>>
>>> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:17?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:34:07 -0800, "rbwinn"
>>> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:49?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:02:16 -0800, "rbwinn"
>>> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:09?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >> Crying about "profanity" is the last resort of one who hasno
>>> >> >> argument to begin with, and merely demonstrates the lack of
>>> >> >> intelligence on the part of the complainer.
>>>
>>> >> >> We can keep doing this until you repent of your
>>> >> >> style-over-substance fallacy. Which you won't do, since you haven't an
>>> >> >> argument to begin with. Crying about "profanity" is just a cover to
>>> >> >> keep people from learning that you have no argument, but it always
>>> >> >> backfires, since it SIGNALS that you have no argument.
>>>
>>> >> >I never claimed to be arguing, Don.
>>>
>>> >> That's good, since you are incapable of holding any sort of
>>> >> rational argument.
>>>
>>> >> > What is there to argue about? %
>>> >> >have freedom of religion here in the United States. /u are free to
>>> >> >be an atheist if that is what you want to be. /u decided to try some
>>> >> >profanity on me.
>>>
>>> >> No, since there's no such thing. And I told you what it means
>>> >> to argue style-over-substance, which is what you did.
>>>
>>> >There is no such thing as profanity?
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> Now, if you would bother to back your claim that atheists say
>>> that the bible doesn't exist (which I know you can't), we can make fun
>>> of you for being so ****ing stupid as to make such a statement.
>
>>Atheists claim the Bible does not exist,
>
> Liar.

Even for Bobby Winn, this is a doozy.
No wonder no other Christians are supporting him in his ravings.
Even they have more sanity tham that!

--
 
In our last episode,
<1172631225.337747.121070@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>, the lovely and
talented rbwinn broadcast on alt.atheism:

> On Feb 26, 11:51?pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>> Hey! ?You're out of business! ?They found the body!

> They found what body?
> Robert B. Winn

The body of Jesus, his wife Mary Magdalene, and their son. There was no
crucifixion. There is no resurrection. The lies of centuries have been
reveal by archaeologists, and your wickedness is exposed.

I am glad I lived to this day, and I hope I live to see all liars like you
thrown down.

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 692 days to go.
 
On 19 Feb 2007 03:02:46 -0800, "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:

>On Feb 18, 10:21?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
>> Michael Gray wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:33:04 -0500, Darrell Stec
>> > <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com> wrote:
>> > - Refer: <53rnsvF1u88b...@mid.individual.net>
>> > >After serious contemplation, on or about Sunday 18 February 2007 10:53
>> > >am rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>>
>> > >> So when Jesus Christ said that he was not the offspring of monkeys,
>> > >> you claim that he was telling a "yarn"?
>> > >> Robert B. Winn
>>
>> > >I'm unfamiliar with that scripture. erhaps you might tells us what the
>> > >phantom bible you got that from says?
>>
>> > The Ladybird Illustrated Book of Bible stories for Children.
>>
>> Or the other one
>>
>> "How to brainwash your children into following The Father"
>>
>> We jest, but the truth is these things happen
>> and it should be declared a criminal offence
>>
>So if the government could be persuaded into burning all Bibles, there
>could be world peace?
>Robert B. Winn

Who was it that said "those who begin by burning books will end up
burning men"?
 
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:29:28 -0600, Paul Ransom Erickson
<prerickson@houston.rr.com> wrote:
- Refer: <spiau29seoku2bqvupnle67cs8haaqcf0h@4ax.com>
>On 19 Feb 2007 03:02:46 -0800, "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 18, 10:21?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
>>> Michael Gray wrote:
>>> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:33:04 -0500, Darrell Stec
>>> > <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com> wrote:
>>> > - Refer: <53rnsvF1u88b...@mid.individual.net>
>>> > >After serious contemplation, on or about Sunday 18 February 2007 10:53
>>> > >am rbwinn perhaps from rbwi...@juno.com wrote:
>>>
>>> > >> So when Jesus Christ said that he was not the offspring of monkeys,
>>> > >> you claim that he was telling a "yarn"?
>>> > >> Robert B. Winn
>>>
>>> > >I'm unfamiliar with that scripture. erhaps you might tells us what the
>>> > >phantom bible you got that from says?
>>>
>>> > The Ladybird Illustrated Book of Bible stories for Children.
>>>
>>> Or the other one
>>>
>>> "How to brainwash your children into following The Father"
>>>
>>> We jest, but the truth is these things happen
>>> and it should be declared a criminal offence
>>>
>>So if the government could be persuaded into burning all Bibles, there
>>could be world peace?
>>Robert B. Winn
>
>Who was it that said "those who begin by burning books will end up
>burning men"?

It was you, just then.

--
 
On Feb 27, 9:43�pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> Don Kresch wrote:
> > In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:17:59 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> > >On Feb 26, 8:26?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> > >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> > >> >On Feb 26, 7:11 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> > >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:51:34 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> > >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:17?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:34:07 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> > >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:49?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:02:16 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> > >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:09?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 22 Feb 2007 19:53:52 -0800, "rbwinn"
> > >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
> > >> >> >> >> >> >How about this? Here is someone who thinks that his ancestors were
> > >> >> >> >> >> >monkeys telling me to grow up.
>
> > WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> > >> >> >> >> >>
 
On Feb 27, 10:19�pm, Paul Duca <p.d...@comcast.net> wrote:
> in article 1172546142.249794.79...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com, rbwinn at
> rbwi...@juno.com wrote on 2/26/07 10:15 PM:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 7:54 pm, Paul Duca <p.d...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> in article 1172454559.575420.50...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com, rbwinn at
> >> rbwi...@juno.com wrote on 2/25/07 8:49 PM:
>
> >>> On Feb 25, 5:15?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >>>> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:29:31 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >>>>> On Feb 24, 6:47?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:00:05 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >>>>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 23, 7:07?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In alt.atheism On 22 Feb 2007 19:19:49 -0800, "rbwinn"
> >>>>>>>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Well, actually, it does.
 
On Feb 28, 1:12�am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> In our last episode,
> <1172631225.337747.121...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>, the lovely and
> talented rbwinn broadcast on alt.atheism:
>
> > On Feb 26, 11:51?pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> >> Hey! ?You're out of business! ?They found the body!
> > They found what body?
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> The body of Jesus, his wife Mary Magdalene, and their son.
 
On Feb 28, 2:29�am, Paul Ransom Erickson <prerick...@houston.rr.com>
wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2007 03:02:46 -0800, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 18, 10:21?pm, bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote:
> >> Michael Gray wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:33:04 -0500, Darrell Stec
> >> > <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com> wrote:
> >> >
 
On Feb 27, 8:27�pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2007 19:06:15 -0800, in alt.atheism
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> <1172631975.817817.307...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 27, 6:59?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> On 26 Feb 2007 22:06:17 -0800, in alt.atheism
> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >> <1172556377.226916.64...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >On Feb 26, 8:20?pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> >> On 26 Feb 2007 19:08:45 -0800, in alt.atheism
> >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >> >> <1172545725.523360.319...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >> >On Feb 26, 5:32 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >> >> >> On 25 Feb 2007 17:23:09 -0800, in alt.atheism
> >> >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> <1172452989.091439.309...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >> ...
>
> >> >> >> >The Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scott case that a runaway slave
> >> >> >> >had to be returned to his owner if he fled to another state. (at was
> >> >> >> >the last Supreme Court ruling on slavery. / now you are saying that
> >> >> >> >the Supreme Court has made another erroneous decision. %ll, that
> >> >> >> >does not really surprise me.
>
> >> >> >> What an absurd claim. At the time, the decision was correct, even though
> >> >> >> it was absolutely repugnant from the modern viewpoint for almost all
> >> >> >> Americans. The Congress and states changed the Constitution so that the
> >> >> >> Dred Scott case is no longer valid.
>
> >> >> >> You really have no idea what you are talking about, whether in religion
> >> >> >> or law. I would not be surprised based on your behavior here if you were
> >> >> >> an ignorant blowhard in other areas of knowledge as well.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >If you want to return runaway slaves, that would be your choice.
>
> >> >> You, of course, know you are making an utterly absurd claim.
>
> >> >> >My opinion is that you have no right to try to practice slavery.
>
> >> >> Yet the Bible that you worship approves of slavery. Why do you disagree
> >> >> with the Bible?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >I don't worship the Bible.
 
On Feb 28, 5:11�am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> In our last episode,
> <1172662555.211807.27...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>,
> the lovely and talented rbwinn
> broadcast on alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 1:12?am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> >> In our last episode,
> >> <1172631225.337747.121...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>, the lovely and
> >> talented rbwinn broadcast on alt.atheism:
>
> >> > On Feb 26, 11:51?pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hey! ?You're out of business! ?They found the body!
> >> > They found what body?
> >> > Robert B. Winn
>
> >> The body of Jesus, his wife Mary Magdalene, and their son. ?There was no
> >> crucifixion. ?There is no resurrection. ?The lies of centuries have been
> >> reveal by archaeologists, and your wickedness is exposed.
>
> >> I am glad I lived to this day, and I hope I live to see all liars like you
> >> thrown down.
> > You Europeans
>
> OH?
 
In our last episode,
<1172662555.211807.27690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>,
the lovely and talented rbwinn
broadcast on alt.atheism:

> On Feb 28, 1:12?am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>> In our last episode,
>> <1172631225.337747.121...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>, the lovely and
>> talented rbwinn broadcast on alt.atheism:
>>
>> > On Feb 26, 11:51?pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>> >> Hey! ?You're out of business! ?They found the body!
>> > They found what body?
>> > Robert B. Winn
>>
>> The body of Jesus, his wife Mary Magdalene, and their son. ?There was no
>> crucifixion. ?There is no resurrection. ?The lies of centuries have been
>> reveal by archaeologists, and your wickedness is exposed.
>>
>> I am glad I lived to this day, and I hope I live to see all liars like you
>> thrown down.

> You Europeans

OH? You are not as European as I am? Or is "Winn" a slave name?

> buy into every lie that becomes popular. Your archeology in this instance
> is about as reliable as the rest of your archeology. The body of Jesus
> was resurrected.

If by resurrected you mean about to become the foundation of an apartment
building, you are right.


--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 692 days to go.
 
In our last episode,
<1172664408.045323.104600@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>,
the lovely and talented rbwinn
broadcast on alt.atheism:

> On Feb 28, 5:11?am, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>> In our last episode,
>> <1172662555.211807.27...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>,
>> the lovely and talented rbwinn
>> broadcast on alt.atheism:

>> > You Europeans
>>
>> OH? ?You are not as European as I am? ?Or is "Winn" a slave name?
>>
>> > buy into every lie that becomes popular. ?Your archeology in this instance
>> > is about as reliable as the rest of your archeology. ?The body of Jesus
>> > was resurrected.
>>
>> If by resurrected you mean about to become the foundation of an apartment
>> building, you are right.
>>
> I am not as European as you are. I do not believe European political
> philosophy.

Yes, you do. The idea that the power of the state should be used to force
a religious agenda on people is as European as it gets. Most European
countries have established religions. Where do you the "divine right of
kings" came from?

The ideas of freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are fundamentally
American. We learned from horrible experiences like the Christian witch
trials in Salem and elsewhere. Europeans did not. The idea that the state
should use the force of law to impose religious standards on everyone is
unAmerican.

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 692 days to go.
 
In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 20:41:53 -0800, "rbwinn"
<rbwinn3@juno.com> let us all know that:

>On Feb 27, 8:31?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 18:59:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Feb 27, 6:43?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:17:59 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >On Feb 26, 8:26?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:46:29 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >On Feb 26, 7:11 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:51:34 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:17?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:34:07 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:49?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:02:16 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:09?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Crying about "profanity" is the last resort of one who hasno
>> >> >> >> argument to begin with, and merely demonstrates the lack of
>> >> >> >> intelligence on the part of the complainer.
>>
>> >> >> >> We can keep doing this until you repent of your
>> >> >> >> style-over-substance fallacy. Which you won't do, since you haven't an
>> >> >> >> argument to begin with. Crying about "profanity" is just a cover to
>> >> >> >> keep people from learning that you have no argument, but it always
>> >> >> >> backfires, since it SIGNALS that you have no argument.
>>
>> >> >> >I never claimed to be arguing, Don.
>>
>> >> >> That's good, since you are incapable of holding any sort of
>> >> >> rational argument.
>>
>> >> >> > What is there to argue about? %
>> >> >> >have freedom of religion here in the United States. /u are free to
>> >> >> >be an atheist if that is what you want to be. /u decided to try some
>> >> >> >profanity on me.
>>
>> >> >> No, since there's no such thing. And I told you what it means
>> >> >> to argue style-over-substance, which is what you did.
>>
>> >> >There is no such thing as profanity?
>>
>> >> Yep.
>>
>> >> Now, if you would bother to back your claim that atheists say
>> >> that the bible doesn't exist (which I know you can't), we can make fun
>> >> of you for being so ****ing stupid as to make such a statement.
>> >Atheists claim the Bible does not exist,
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>Well, what about profanity,

Doesn't exist. But that has nothing to do with your lie that
atheists claim that the bible doesn't exist.


Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.

"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
 
In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 20:29:26 -0800, "rbwinn"
<rbwinn3@juno.com> let us all know that:

>On Feb 27, 8:31?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> In alt.atheism On 27 Feb 2007 18:55:55 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Feb 27, 6:42?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 22:16:01 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >On Feb 26, 8:25?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> In alt.atheism On 26 Feb 2007 06:50:36 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >On Feb 26, 7:09 am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 25 Feb 2007 17:50:25 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >On Feb 25, 5:16?pm, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 24 Feb 2007 06:32:15 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 24, 6:47?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 23 Feb 2007 18:04:58 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> >> <rbwi...@juno.com> let us all know that:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >On Feb 23, 7:10?am, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxer...@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> In alt.atheism On 22 Feb 2007 19:31:53 -0800, "rbwinn"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Well, here we have another statement from an atheist denying the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >existence of the Bible.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> /, that's not what we have. We only have that if you, Bobby,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> do not understand English. Are you admitting that you do not
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> understand English?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >You first, Don.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> ( please, Bobby. IKYABWAI is so kindergarten.
>> >> >> >> >> >So don't try it on me.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> KYABWAI followed with IKYABWAI is really childish.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Well, you can stop doing it any time, Don.
>>
>> >> >> >> Wow--you did it a 3rd time!
>>
>> >> >> >> Sheesh--how childish are you?
>> >> >> >I don't see why you would want to base your life on what I do or don't
>> >> >> >do.
>>
>> >> >> I don't. I just think it's amusing how childish you are.
>>
>> >> >I have never thought you were amusing.
>>
>> >> That's because I'm educational.
>>
>> >> > And you are not childish.
>>
>> >> That's because I don't believe in god. The upshot is that
>> >> those who believe in god are childish.
>>
>> >> Don
>> >Satan believes in God,
>>
>> No, there's no such thing as satan.
>>
>> Though if there were, you'd know that satan is merely a
>> description--a title. If you'd read Numbers chapter 22, specifically
>> from verse 20 through 26, you'd find that satan isn't what you think
>> it is.
>>
>> Don
>I thought you said you did not believe the Bible,

You, OTOH, do. Ergo, you should believe the words in it. Ergo,
you should know what a satan is, according to Numbers 22:20-26.


Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.

"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
 
On Feb 27, 10:01 pm, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
[...]
> > Winnie, it's a sin to testify falsely:
>
> > I wish those who unsettle you would mutilate themselves! (Gal 5:12)
> > Look out for the dogs, look out for the evil-workers look out for
> > those who mutilate the flesh. (Phil. 3:2)
> > Slaves, obey in everything those who are your earthly masters, not
> > with eye service, as men pleasers, but in singleness of heart. (Col.
> > 3:22)
> > If any one will not work, let him not eat. (2 Thess.. 3:10)
> > Wives, be subject to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. (Col.
> > 3:18)
> > Let her wear a veil. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he
> > is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. (Neither
> > was man created for the woman, but woman for man.) (1 Cor. 11:6-9)
> > If any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you
> > received, let him be accursed. (Gal 1:9)
> > God gave them (the Jews) a spirit of stupor, eyes that should not see
> > and ears that should not hear, down to this very day. (Rom. 11:8)
> > It is shameful for a woman to speak in church. (1 Cor. 14:35)
> > I magnify my ministry in order to make my fellow Jews jealous, and
> > thus save some of them. (Rom. 11:13-14).
>
> > Paul clearly approved of slavery, subjugation of women, anti-Semitism,
> > and other brutalities. ?I'm sure I remember Paul approving of beating
> > a servant too, and will try to enlighten you on that when I find it.
>
> Well, why don't you discuss your ideas with Paul after the
> resurrection?
> Robert B. Winn

Wimped out, didn't you? Well, you been peddling your superstitions
here from as early, at least, as 1998. Time to award you a jersey and
retire you. May I suggest you develop a better love of the truth, i.
e., don't tell so many whoppers or be so devious?
 
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172545485.665949.72310@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 10:16 am, "jl" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 6:16 am, "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>> > On Feb 26, 2:18?am, Darrell Stec <darrell_s...@webpagesorcery.com>
>> [...]
>> > Well, you are an apostate Christian. That means you are more
>> > dishonest than a person who was raised atheist.
>> > Robert B. Winn
>>
>> On the contrary, my dear Winnie, the ex-Christian has turned away from
>> dishonesty and embraced truth. He is to be more admired and esteemed
>> for having grappled himself up out of the stifling quicksands of
>> religion and walked in the verdant and enlightened fields of atheism.
>
> Well, if you atheists are so happy, why can't you stay away from
> trying to discredit religion? It seems to me that if you were the way
> you say you are, you would just show by example how much better it is
> to be an atheist. Instead, all I see you doing is trying to strike
> up conversations about the Bible.
> Robert B. Winn
>
That's the whole point of atheism, .. to be against something, and to be
for, that is in favour of, nothing. I mean, does jls1...@bellsouth.net
really believe that Christ stands for "dishonesty" and "quicksands" and
hates "verdant and enlightened fields"?
It must be patently obvious to most everyone, that this kind of atheism
testifies of one who perhaps has grasped some forms and practices of
religion, but has missed, if not totally misunderstood the spirit of it.

Pastor Frank

2Tm:3:5: Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from
such turn away.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172545881.572790.37170@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 6:01 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>> You've made a claim that you cannot support. You've made prior claims
>> that are demonstrably wrong. It is appropriate and necessary to let
>> people know that you are untrustworthy. Your claim to be religious does
>> not change that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> Spoken like an atheist. You have said that our freedom depends on
> permission from atheists. No, sorry, our freedom has nothing to do
> with you or your corrupt philosophies. Jeswus Christ was the one who
> said we were free.
> Robert B. Winn
>
Exactly right. Our rights and freedoms rest in God, not in the law nor
in the courts, nor constitution, nor in government etc. That means they
cannot be recinded by man.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1172546142.249794.79230@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 7:54 pm, Paul Duca <p.d...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> I certainly will...and I won't be disappointed, because there is
>> NOTHING Jesus Christ can offer me I would actually WANT.
>
Christ is about love, ...and that to the death if need be. Paul Duca is
about sex, without love if need be.

> Well, Jesus Christ would be the one to tell your idea. Strangely, the
> scriptures say that none of you people are going to take advantage of
> the opportunity.
> Robert B. Winn
>
We go where we want to go, and Christians go where they have reason to
praise, glorify and worship for all eternity, whereas atheists go where they
can complain, trash and flame for all eternity. See below

Pastor Frank

Jesus in Mt:8:12: But the children of Satan's kingdom shall be cast into
outer darkness: There shall be wailing (of interminable complaints and
accusations) and the gnashing of teeth (in frustration and impotent rage).



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:dp87u2puojrjnf1cm9nnjsi0mi2cc56msv@4ax.com...
> On 26 Feb 2007 19:08:45 -0800, in alt.atheism
> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
> <1172545725.523360.319420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
>>On Feb 26, 5:32 pm, Free Lunch <l...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>> On 25 Feb 2007 17:23:09 -0800, in alt.atheism
>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in
>>> <1172452989.091439.309...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>> >The Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scott case that a runaway slave
>>> >had to be returned to his owner if he fled to another state. That was
>>> >the last Supreme Court ruling on slavery. So now you are saying that
>>> >the Supreme Court has made another erroneous decision. Well, that
>>> >does not really surprise me.
>>>
>>> What an absurd claim. At the time, the decision was correct, even though
>>> it was absolutely repugnant from the modern viewpoint for almost all
>>> Americans. The Congress and states changed the Constitution so that the
>>> Dred Scott case is no longer valid.
>>>
>>> You really have no idea what you are talking about, whether in religion
>>> or law. I would not be surprised based on your behavior here if you were
>>> an ignorant blowhard in other areas of knowledge as well.- Hide quoted
>>> text -
>>>
>>If you want to return runaway slaves, that would be your choice.
>
> You, of course, know you are making an utterly absurd claim.
>
>>My opinion is that you have no right to try to practice slavery.
>
> Yet the Bible that you worship approves of slavery. Why do you disagree
> with the Bible?
>
Quote please! Where does the Christian NT Bible "approve of slavery"?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 

Similar threads

R
NO EVIDENCE OF ANY GODS
Replies
5
Views
18
Richo
R
B
A CHALLENGE FOR RELIGIONISTS
Replies
6
Views
18
Steve Hayes
S
B
FALSE GODS
2 3
Replies
55
Views
56
bob young
B
B
EVIDENCE OF NO REAL GOD
Replies
4
Views
21
Christopher A.Lee
C
B
GOD MYTHS AND FABLES
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
71
bob young
B
Back
Top