Chi
New member
Does she know how contradicting she sounds? If a person has nothing to hide, they would not be afraid to face head on people questioning their ethics. Also, since when do fighters quit and are afraid/refuse to face the music??
Does she know how contradicting she sounds? If a person has nothing to hide, they would not be afraid to face head on people questioning their ethics. Also, since when do fighters quit and are afraid/refuse to face the music??
Does she know how contradicting she sounds? If a person has nothing to hide, they would not be afraid to face head on people questioning their ethics. Also, since when do fighters quit??
That's what she says. Time will tell all the details soon enough and just how frivilous these lawsuits were. She should have still finished her term and faced things head on if she's done no wrong. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear = a clear conscience. But she always wants to do things her own way and to be the exception of the rules.It wasn't just the fact that there were, dozens of frivilous, claims (more proof that there needs to be tort reform in this country so you can't just make claims like this or sue people without cause). It's the fact that it's not only costing her close to $1 mil to defend herself, but the state oodles of money too. Not just in legal fees, but it's taking state employees time away from the jobs they should be doing and could be doing if not for all the false and pending accusations.
Anything can be too much in excess.Does she know how contradicting she sounds? If a person has nothing to hide, they would not be afraid to face head on people questioning their ethics. Also, since when do fighters quit and are afraid/refuse to face the music??
Anything can be too much in excess.
How many times would you want to fight fake complaints and how much of your savings would you want to spend on standing against these false claims?
As a parent alone you have to let go of pride and remember that if she goes broke fighting these false claims it is her children who will suffer for that pride.
Will you volunteer to pay her legal fees if she fights?
Anything can be too much in excess.
How many times would you want to fight fake complaints and how much of your savings would you want to spend on standing against these false claims?
As a parent alone you have to let go of pride and remember that if she goes broke fighting these false claims it is her children who will suffer for that pride.
Will you volunteer to pay her legal fees if she fights?
Yeah and a 12 million dollar home she doesn't even need to be living in at all! She's really supposed to be living in the governor's mansion (or was, since she's quit.) But in not doing so, she's accrued over $18,000 in taxes, which I don't think she's paid yet. Along with other unecessary costs she's cost the tax payers in Alaska, like flying her daughters and their friends places for so-called "state business" (yeah right!) That's racked up almost $22,000 in flights and hotel stays alone.She may have legal fees in around 1 million dollars, but she also has a 12 million dollar home. Perhaps she shouldn't be living so large already.
Yeah, poor Sarah Palin and her poor children. They are a dollar away from being homeless and in the bread line... Please, stop being ridiculous and dramatic.I just love it, you say she should send her children to live in the streets just to fight **** that is 100% politically driven by people who fear her?
Blind fighting is all pride, and pride does not put groceries on the table.
I love the house comment too, like she should have to lose her home and the home of her children just to fight false claims. Easy to claim you ladies would take your family down into complete distruction just for pride alone......I know I would never do anything of the sort, my children are more valuable to me than my pride.
You really are an idiot. What she was doing is living in her house and traveling to Anchorage to do business (instead of just living in the mansion in Juneau). That's like if Obama was still living here in IL yet traveling all of the time to DC to do business. No one said anything about selling, genius.So Obama should sell his home because he is supposed to be living at the whitehouse?
Sometimes it is just too easy shooting you guys down, lol.
Sure you did, you said she could sell it to pay her legal bills and she didn't need it anyway because she was supposed to be living elsewhere.You really are an idiot. What she was doing is living in her house and traveling to Anchorage to do business (instead of just living in the mansion in Juneau). That's like if Obama was still living here in IL yet traveling all of the time to DC to do business. No one said anything about selling, genius.
Hm, really? When and where did I say she could sell her home to pay for her legal bills?? And you call people liars...Sure you did, you said she could sell it to pay her legal bills and she didn't need it anyway because she was supposed to be living elsewhere.
But my point is she will not be govenor forever just like Obama will not be President forever so why should she sell her home and have no home for herself and her children just to pay for false legal battles?
Seems sort of stupid to be standing on the street with no home but you can claim your pride is intact.
When Emkay said Sarah could sell her 12 million dollar home to pay her legal bills you replied in agreement and said this.Yeah and a 12 million dollar home she doesn't even need to be living in at all! She's really supposed to be living in the governor's mansion (or was, since she's quit.)
You are lying again. Emkay never said she should sell her house either, but nice try. I see why you accuse other of things because it is YOU who is a liar.When Emkay said Sarah could sell her 12 million dollar home to pay her legal bills you replied in agreement and said this.
If you were not agreeing that Sarah should sell her home as Emkay mentioned then I am sorry for not understanding you.
So you then agree with me that Sarah should not be forced to sell things like her home just to defend herself from false claims....right?
You are lying again. Emkay never said she should sell her house either, but nice try. I see why you accuse other of things because it is YOU who is a liar.
That is exactly what she said and what you replied to, stop trying to reshuffle the deck, it is what it is, no point in trying to reinvent what has been said, just say it out straight instead of dodging with your personal flames.She may have legal fees in around 1 million dollars, but she also has a 12 million dollar home. Perhaps she shouldn't be living so large already.