Palin to resign as Alaska governor

[snafu]

I never screwed Ted, Snafu is lying.

Well somebody did I think we need a DNA sample from you We can match it up to the rape kit.

 

[timesjoke]

"So when Obama spent $250,000 taxpayer dollars to take Michelle on a date to new york, how do you see that?"
My guess is you're jealous? Extreme ***** envy? You're an enigma TJ.

Now who is dodging.

You said Sarah spending tax payer money to buy personal designer clothes was bad, well how about blowing $250,000 tax payer dollars on one evening for a date? Obama is spending a lot more tax money on personal entertainment and junk then Sarah could ever dream of spending but for some reason you call her spending bad.......why is her lower spending bad but Obama's much greater spending good?

At least Sarah spent her money from her paycheck, Obama is spending money over and above his paycheck.

I am just asking for some balanced playing field from you and others. You can't call her money spent from her own paycheck as bad.

By the way, why did you lie about how much Sarah's home is worth?

It seems to me your the one who is jealous.

 

[emkay64]

Now who is dodging.
You said Sarah spending tax payer money to buy personal designer clothes was bad, well how about blowing $250,000 tax payer dollars on one evening for a date? Obama is spending a lot more tax money on personal entertainment and junk then Sarah could ever dream of spending but for some reason you call her spending bad.......why is her lower spending bad but Obama's much greater spending good?

At least Sarah spent her money from her paycheck, Obama is spending money over and above his paycheck.

I am just asking for some balanced playing field from you and others. You can't call her money spent from her own paycheck as bad.

By the way, why did you lie about how much Sarah's home is worth?

It seems to me your the one who is jealous.

"You said Sarah spending tax payer money to buy personal designer clothes was bad"

I never said that Chi did lol.

I lied because you can't be objective where she is concerned or for anything that doesn't back your claims TJ, and you assume I'm lying anyways. I've already said I have no issue with Sara...I said I doubt she has done anything wrong. The only thing I've said is that it's kinda disappointing she has backed down so easy.

Just as I've said I don't doubt the supreme court articles. I'm sure they may be true for some people. You are always going to hear about problems because happy health care stories don't sell newspapers. I told you about my personal experience...and said mine did not reflect that of the supreme court and neither have I had these complaints from family and friends. Because it doesn't back your government articles I must be lying.

There is no hope in having any kind of rationale with you. I may as well lie. Your buttons are so easy to push. Your best argument is that I'm jealous. I'm just going with the flow. I don't want your approval so it's fun to play with you in the mean time. You use so many "personal experiences" to back your arguments...i thought it was fair game...my mistake.

Anyways this all so redundant. I'm getting bored as I'm sure everyone else is. I can't keep saying the same thing over and over. Comprehension escapes you...I'm guessing Altzheimers?

 

[timesjoke]

"You said Sarah spending tax payer money to buy personal designer clothes was bad"

I never said that Chi did lol.

Your right, my mistake, that was Chi, you just said she didn't deserve a nice home so she should take a step down.

I lied because you can't be objective where she is concerned or for anything that doesn't back your claims TJ, and you assume I'm lying anyways. I've already said I have no issue with Sara...I said I doubt she has done anything wrong. The only thing I've said is that it's kinda disappointing she has backed down so easy.

Just as I've said I don't doubt the supreme court articles. I'm sure they may be true for some people. You are always going to hear about problems because happy health care stories don't sell newspapers. I told you about my personal experience...and said mine did not reflect that of the supreme court and neither have I had these complaints from family and friends. Because it doesn't back your government articles I must be lying.

There is no hope in having any kind of rationale with you. I may as well lie. Your buttons are so easy to push. Your best argument is that I'm jealous. I'm just going with the flow. I don't want your approval so it's fun to play with you in the mean time. You use so many "personal experiences" to back your arguments...i thought it was fair game...my mistake.

Oh bull. Trying to tie in your lack in the medical debate is just childish. I had the facts, you had nothign but one person's experience. You cannot expect me to toss out all that data proving your wrong just because "YOU" say the suppreme court was wrong. If you want to discuss this go back to that thread and don't derail this one.

You said Sarah deserved to be taken down and she should not have a 12 million dollar home, that has nothing to do with me Emkay. I cannot make you post a lie, trying to say you lie because someone expects you to lie is just foolish.

I am not Mangiafuoco.

You do what you do, but at least you did admit to being a liar.

Emkay,

These kinds of discussions require a ceretain level of detachment and discussing "general" truths. You see to make everything personal and ignore the general truths for limited and rare personal observations. This is where we clash.

I will not ignore the facts and studies of the general discussion while you seem incapable of even seeing the studies. **** you even claim they were never done if they do not agree with you as if there is a huge conspiracy to make you look bad or something.

 

[emkay64]

"You said Sarah deserved to be taken down and she should not have a 12 million dollar home"

Never said that lol...again...where did I say she deserved to be taken down! That's harsh. I never said she didn't deserve a multimillion dollar home I said a smaller one would suffice to cover bills, but that is moot isn't it? lol.

Find me those direct quotes....all of them...and be real verbose...because I do love seeing your epic responses!

 

[timesjoke]

Perhaps she shouldn't be living so large already.

I never did say to sell her home...I think 12 million on a home was premature given where she is politically...although now that you mention it...I actually think she could downsize. So yes...a smaller home is a fantastic idea TJ. Thanks for bringing it to light. If she ends up on the streets, well...that's just too ****** bad...sounds like poor management to me.

First of all you played the 12 mil number very hard.

Your point was clear, why do you think she is "living so large"?

Large compared to who? You? Why is the way she lives or the amount her home is worth relivant to is someone should be crippled with unfair legal fees or not?

Do you believe the "rich" deserve anything that happens to them?

Or just her?

 

[emkay64]

Hmmm...those quotes do NOT reflect what you said I said...try again

 

[timesjoke]

Hmmm...those quotes do NOT reflect what you said I said...try again

Yes they do, as I told Chi, too late to try and reshuffle the deck.

Your need to lie about the worth of Sarah's home just adds to the fact that you were attacking her prosperity and saying she should not have what she has.

But again, why were you saying that?

Why are you jealous?

 

[hugo]

Sarah was a big spending liberal whose main claim to fame was taxing production, and eliminating jobs, so she could give every Alaskan a welfare check. Off with her head.

 

[emkay64]

Your need to lie about the worth of Sarah's home just adds to the fact that you were attacking her prosperity and saying she should not have what she has.

Oh TJ....

My lie was a little experiment at your expense. Sadly you didn't surprise me at all. Maybe next time puts on lab coat and glasses ....

So teste....I thought you liked "experiments".

 

[mercury]

I do, and why not, you believe people should sell their homes to pay for medical care. Remember in your own words. She can start over and rebuild..

.

I do, too. I had to sell a ton of my **** to take care of my family... We're still kicking. We're still a family. We still have a home (we just don't own the structure). A life is more than a 12 million dollar house and just because you can't keep the 12 million dollar house IN the family doesn't mean you have failed at taking care of your family.

What's more important? Protecting the ownership of a pile of lumber and nails that's been valued at 12 million dollars? Or preserving the reputation, which provides for 12 million dollar homes for her family?? I'd vote for the reputation... I'm sure that house still carries a hefty mortgage and sucks up a lot of resources, which may not be able to be paid once her reputation is dragged through the mud.

 

[mercury]

Reading through the comments, I don't interpret those quoted to mean "she should sell her house to finanace her legal fees from frivolous lawsuits", I read them as "Is if you can't afford the life you're living, it's time to downsize it. **** happens and sometimes we have to go back in order to move forward."

What if it were medical bills, instead of legal bills? Would you still hold that you shouldn't have to sell the family home or that if you did, you weren't taking care of your family?

 

[mercury]

First of all you played the 12 mil number very hard.
Your point was clear, why do you think she is "living so large"?

Large compared to who? You? Why is the way she lives or the amount her home is worth relivant to is someone should be crippled with unfair legal fees or not?

Do you believe the "rich" deserve anything that happens to them?

Or just her?

Living Large compared to the majority of the world.

Who says they are unfair? Are you judge and jury, now? I don't think you, or anyone else, can say they are "unfair" until the hearing has occurred and the facts are presented... I'm pretty sure that's why we have courts of law. I didn't think it was "fair" when that one ***** decided that our company would pay to have her entire house re-painted after she had already scheduled the painters to come after we were done with her floors, but that little 1" chip of paint that stuck to the tape after it came off the top of her 25' wall said different. THAT was a frivolous lawsuit.

No... I don't believe the "rich" deserve anything that happens to them, but I do believe they have more resources to deal with things that may cripple an "average" income family. (Like 12 million worth of house they can sell when times get tough.)

 

[timesjoke]

^^^^^See there Emkay how your lie grows?

Was that the experiement to see how many people believed your lie?

Well your claim it was an experiment is also a lie, you tried to pass it off referring to it several times and adding in you saw no big deal if Sarah ended up in the streets.

If not for Snaff calling you down on your lie it would still be out there. ****, even I thought you were being honest so me trying to take you for your word and trust what your saying backfired on me............

Now there is a lesson for me, should I not have trusted you?

Merc, the house is not worth 12 million, that was one of Emkay's lies. She already admitted it and Snaff said it was more like 550,000. So she is not one of the "evil" rich you think she is.

 

[emkay64]

^^^^^See there Emkay how your lie grows?
Was that the experiement to see how many people believed your lie?

Well your claim it was an experiment is also a lie, you tried to pass it off referring to it several times and adding in you saw no big deal if Sarah ended up in the streets.

If not for Snaff calling you down on your lie it would still be out there. ****, even I thought you were being honest so me trying to take you for your word and trust what your saying backfired on me............

Now there is a lesson for me, should I not have trusted you?

jots a few notes down and giggles maniacally.

 

[timesjoke]

jots a few notes down and giggles maniacally.

lol, right, like you didn't mean to lie as an attack on Sarah, all that talk that went with the lie about Sarah ending up on the street was just window dressing for support of the lie, it was not heart felt on your part to write such nasty stuff........

Right, so what lie do we believe again?

 

[emkay64]

lol, right, like you didn't mean to lie as an attack on Sarah, all that talk that went with the lie about Sarah ending up on the street was just window dressing for support of the lie, it was not heart felt on your part to write such nasty stuff........
Right, so what lie do we believe again?

Hmmm....

Subject continues to drone on. Clearly still upset at being hoodwinked. Will check back in two minutes. Oh! Please feel free to believe whatever you like. It matters nothing to my data.

 

[mercury]

whatever.... the majority of the people in this country are not living as large as Sarah Palin, regardless of what her house is worth or not worth.

When expenses threaten to overtake you, you scale back on expenses that can be cut and you liquidate your assets to stay afloat. If you don't, you're a friggin' idiot that is overly attached to material possessions.

 

[snafu]

Reading through the comments, I don't interpret those quoted to mean "she should sell her house to finanace her legal fees from frivolous lawsuits", I read them as "Is if you can't afford the life you're living, it's time to downsize it. **** happens and sometimes we have to go back in order to move forward."
What if it were medical bills, instead of legal bills? Would you still hold that you shouldn't have to sell the family home or that if you did, you weren't taking care of your family?

Merc try reading the part where it?s costing Alaska over a million dollars not just her. Her aids and lawyers have to work on ethic complaints as apposed to doing work for Alaskans. Also the Democrats stopped working with her across the isle. She is taking a calculated risk by working for the Republican Party outside of the governorship. With the internet and how Obama was able to pull off getting into office she just might be on to something.

 

[mercury]

Legal expenses are all part of the game... all those up and coming lawyers who will be making a move for public office have to make their money somewhere.