L
liam o'shea
Guest
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:29:27 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>liam o'shea wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:33:25 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0500, "John P."
>>>><JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Anonymous Loser" <AnonymousLoser@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in a a
>>>>>message
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence officials had
>>>>>>several warnings that terrorists might attack the United States
>>>>>>on its home soil -- even using airplanes as weapons -- well
>>>>>>before the September 11, 2001 attacks, two congressional
>>>>>>committees said in a report released Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>>During the week of July 4, 2007, four people will die in car accidents on
>>>>>the interstate highways in and around the Chicago area.
>>>>>
>>>>>Armed with this specific information, stop it from happening.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8
>>>>
>>>>Alex Jones was able to piece the information together and predict
>>>>pretty accurately what happened on 911, several months before the
>>>>event.
>>>>
>>>>Seems a shame he wasn't listened to by the 'powers who be', rather
>>>>than be ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.
>>>
>>>He's a conspiracy nut first, he's someone worth listening to 345th.
>>
>>
>> His research is undeniable and exhaustive.
>
>And wrong.
>
But that is only your opinion. As I said to Crxx:
To the believer no proof is necessary.
To the non-believer, no proof is possible.
I'd be happy to agree with you if you could show as much tangible
evidence to show he was incorrect, as he can show to prove that he is
correct.
>> Proof doesn't make a conspiracy nut - it simply proves a point of
>> view.
>>
>> And he has some very convincing paper trails of proof.
>
>He spews too much bullshit. If he's been right once, he's been wrong a
>billion times. Those phony TV psychics have better records.
Edison had the same problem. He failed 20,000 times and was ridiculed
as a loose, dreamer and fraud. Fortunately he persisted, and changed
the world.
I seem to remember Henry Ford, and a myriad of others, also suffered
the same fate from many sector 7G plebs.
>liam o'shea wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:33:25 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0500, "John P."
>>>><JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Anonymous Loser" <AnonymousLoser@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in a a
>>>>>message
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence officials had
>>>>>>several warnings that terrorists might attack the United States
>>>>>>on its home soil -- even using airplanes as weapons -- well
>>>>>>before the September 11, 2001 attacks, two congressional
>>>>>>committees said in a report released Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>>During the week of July 4, 2007, four people will die in car accidents on
>>>>>the interstate highways in and around the Chicago area.
>>>>>
>>>>>Armed with this specific information, stop it from happening.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8
>>>>
>>>>Alex Jones was able to piece the information together and predict
>>>>pretty accurately what happened on 911, several months before the
>>>>event.
>>>>
>>>>Seems a shame he wasn't listened to by the 'powers who be', rather
>>>>than be ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.
>>>
>>>He's a conspiracy nut first, he's someone worth listening to 345th.
>>
>>
>> His research is undeniable and exhaustive.
>
>And wrong.
>
But that is only your opinion. As I said to Crxx:
To the believer no proof is necessary.
To the non-believer, no proof is possible.
I'd be happy to agree with you if you could show as much tangible
evidence to show he was incorrect, as he can show to prove that he is
correct.
>> Proof doesn't make a conspiracy nut - it simply proves a point of
>> view.
>>
>> And he has some very convincing paper trails of proof.
>
>He spews too much bullshit. If he's been right once, he's been wrong a
>billion times. Those phony TV psychics have better records.
Edison had the same problem. He failed 20,000 times and was ridiculed
as a loose, dreamer and fraud. Fortunately he persisted, and changed
the world.
I seem to remember Henry Ford, and a myriad of others, also suffered
the same fate from many sector 7G plebs.