Report cites warnings before September 11, 2001...

  • Thread starter Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
  • Start date
On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
> liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>
> >>liamo'shea wrote:
>
> >>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
> >>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>
> >>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
> >>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>
> >>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>
> >>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>
> >>>>>>Christine!
>
> >>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
> >>>>>is coming.
>
> >>>>snip <more crap>
>
> >>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
> >>>>this thing or some other.
>
> >>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
> >>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
> >>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
> >>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>
> >>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>
> >>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>
> >>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>
> >>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>- Show quoted text -
>
> > Wow - what a comeback.
>
> > I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
> > from your reply.
>
> > How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>
> > That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
> > a winner.
>
> When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
> further discussion. It seems you're part of that
> class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>
> <flush>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
called FACTS.

Surely you can do that, can't you?

Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
without any form of malice.

Or could it be that you have never even seen them. Your views are
simply that - your own gut instinct views.

Sorry - but that just won't cut it in the real world.
 
liam o'shea wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:29:27 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:33:25 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0500, "John P."
>>>>><JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Anonymous Loser" <AnonymousLoser@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in a a
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence officials had
>>>>>>>several warnings that terrorists might attack the United States
>>>>>>>on its home soil -- even using airplanes as weapons -- well
>>>>>>>before the September 11, 2001 attacks, two congressional
>>>>>>>committees said in a report released Wednesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>During the week of July 4, 2007, four people will die in car accidents on
>>>>>>the interstate highways in and around the Chicago area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Armed with this specific information, stop it from happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8
>>>>>
>>>>>Alex Jones was able to piece the information together and predict
>>>>>pretty accurately what happened on 911, several months before the
>>>>>event.
>>>>>
>>>>>Seems a shame he wasn't listened to by the 'powers who be', rather
>>>>>than be ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.
>>>>
>>>>He's a conspiracy nut first, he's someone worth listening to 345th.
>>>
>>>
>>>His research is undeniable and exhaustive.
>>
>>And wrong.
>>
>
>
> But that is only your opinion. As I said to Crxx:
>
> To the believer no proof is necessary.
>
> To the non-believer, no proof is possible.
>
> I'd be happy to agree with you if you could show as much tangible
> evidence to show he was incorrect, as he can show to prove that he is
> correct.

Did 4 million people die? Was it a nuclear attack?
No? Then he was wrong.

Anyone can say at any time "terrorists are going to attack us. It will
happen and a lot of people will die" and they will eventually be proven
"right". It's not much more of a predicition than saying there will be
sunlight tomorrow.

>>>Proof doesn't make a conspiracy nut - it simply proves a point of
>>>view.
>>>
>>>And he has some very convincing paper trails of proof.
>>
>>He spews too much bullshit. If he's been right once, he's been wrong a
>>billion times. Those phony TV psychics have better records.
>
>
> Edison had the same problem. He failed 20,000 times and was ridiculed
> as a loose, dreamer and fraud. Fortunately he persisted, and changed
> the world.

Alex Jones is no Edison. Edison was actually using science and logic in
an attempt to achieve certain goals. Jones uses conjecture and paranoia
in an attempt to sell DVDs. He slings a million pieces of **** at the
wall and if one piece sticks, he ignores the rest and cries out "Told
you so!"
 
seon ferguson wrote:

> "liam o'shea" <liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4h2393548d7r0hjptsrdbc6fqp20bphvc6@4ax.com...
>
>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:29:27 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:33:25 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>liam o'shea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0500, "John P."
>>>>>><JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Anonymous Loser" <AnonymousLoser@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in a a
>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence officials had
>>>>>>>>several warnings that terrorists might attack the United States
>>>>>>>>on its home soil -- even using airplanes as weapons -- well
>>>>>>>>before the September 11, 2001 attacks, two congressional
>>>>>>>>committees said in a report released Wednesday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>During the week of July 4, 2007, four people will die in car accidents
>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>the interstate highways in and around the Chicago area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Armed with this specific information, stop it from happening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Alex Jones was able to piece the information together and predict
>>>>>>pretty accurately what happened on 911, several months before the
>>>>>>event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Seems a shame he wasn't listened to by the 'powers who be', rather
>>>>>>than be ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.
>>>>>
>>>>>He's a conspiracy nut first, he's someone worth listening to 345th.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>His research is undeniable and exhaustive.
>>>
>>>And wrong.
>>>
>>
>>But that is only your opinion. As I said to Crxx:
>>
>>To the believer no proof is necessary.
>>
>>To the non-believer, no proof is possible.
>>
>>I'd be happy to agree with you if you could show as much tangible
>>evidence to show he was incorrect, as he can show to prove that he is
>>correct.
>>
>>
>>>>Proof doesn't make a conspiracy nut - it simply proves a point of
>>>>view.
>>>>
>>>>And he has some very convincing paper trails of proof.
>>>
>>>He spews too much bullshit. If he's been right once, he's been wrong a
>>>billion times. Those phony TV psychics have better records.
>>
>>Edison had the same problem. He failed 20,000 times and was ridiculed
>>as a loose, dreamer and fraud. Fortunately he persisted, and changed
>>the world.
>>
>>I seem to remember Henry Ford, and a myriad of others, also suffered
>>the same fate from many sector 7G plebs.
>
>
> I like how these people cant admit that Alex Jones predicted there would be
> a terrorist attack blaimed on binladen. All they say is Jones is a kook and
> expect us to leave it at that.

There were a large number of terrorist attacks BEFORE then blamed on bin
Laden.
It doesn't take a genius to "predict" another one by bin Laden. Any
prediction related to an attack by bin Laden should include the method
and date of the attack, otherwise it's just stating the obvious.


Here...

al Qaeda is going to hit the United States again before 2009. A lot of
people will die as a result. Many Americans will use it as political
propaganda by claiming that the Bush Administration did nothing to
protect the country during his 8 years in office.

When it happens, you won't see me running around yelling "told ya so"
like Jones does. It's simply a logical conclusion based on bin Laden's
history and the partisanship in the US.
 
liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au wrote:

> On Jul 9, 4:22 pm, "seon ferguson" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>"liamo'shea" <liam.os...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>
>>news:4h2393548d7r0hjptsrdbc6fqp20bphvc6@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:29:27 GMT, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:33:25 GMT, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0500, "John P."
>>>>>>><JohnP_Da_Evil_...@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>"Anonymous Loser" <AnonymousLo...@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in a a
>>>>>>>>message
>>
>>>>>>>>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence officials had
>>>>>>>>>several warnings that terrorists might attack the United States
>>>>>>>>>on its home soil -- even using airplanes as weapons -- well
>>>>>>>>>before the September 11, 2001 attacks, two congressional
>>>>>>>>>committees said in a report released Wednesday.
>>
>>>>>>>>During the week of July 4, 2007, four people will die in car accidents
>>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>>the interstate highways in and around the Chicago area.
>>
>>>>>>>>Armed with this specific information, stop it from happening.
>>
>>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGtOFudmHG8
>>
>>>>>>>Alex Jones was able to piece the information together and predict
>>>>>>>pretty accurately what happened on 911, several months before the
>>>>>>>event.
>>
>>>>>>>Seems a shame he wasn't listened to by the 'powers who be', rather
>>>>>>>than be ridiculed as a conspiracy nut.
>>
>>>>>>He's a conspiracy nut first, he's someone worth listening to 345th.
>>
>>>>>His research is undeniable and exhaustive.
>>
>>>>And wrong.
>>
>>>But that is only your opinion. As I said to Crxx:
>>
>>>To the believer no proof is necessary.
>>
>>>To the non-believer, no proof is possible.
>>
>>>I'd be happy to agree with you if you could show as much tangible
>>>evidence to show he was incorrect, as he can show to prove that he is
>>>correct.
>>
>>>>>Proof doesn't make a conspiracy nut - it simply proves a point of
>>>>>view.
>>
>>>>>And he has some very convincing paper trails of proof.
>>
>>>>He spews too much bullshit. If he's been right once, he's been wrong a
>>>>billion times. Those phony TV psychics have better records.
>>
>>>Edison had the same problem. He failed 20,000 times and was ridiculed
>>>as a loose, dreamer and fraud. Fortunately he persisted, and changed
>>>the world.
>>
>>>I seem to remember Henry Ford, and a myriad of others, also suffered
>>>the same fate from many sector 7G plebs.
>>
>>I like how these people cant admit that Alex Jones predicted there would be
>>a terrorist attack blaimed on binladen. All they say is Jones is a kook and
>>expect us to leave it at that.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> It is to laugh, to be sure :)

Meanwhile, last August, Jones predicted a major "false flag terrorist
attack" blamed on Hezbollah or al Qaeda would happen BEFORE October 2006
and would be the start of World War 3. When it didn't happen, Jones
claimed that his "alert" exposed the plan and caused it to be canceled.

With such logic, he can predict anything he wants and whether it happens
or not, he claims credit for either predicting it or preventing it.

The reality is that he's just a paranoid, delusional fool in Texas who
is EXTREMELY ignorant about world affairs.
 
liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au wrote:

> On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>
>>liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>>
>>>>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
>>>>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>>
>>>>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>>
>>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>>
>>>>>>>>Christine!
>>
>>>>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
>>>>>>>is coming.
>>
>>>>>>snip <more crap>
>>
>>>>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
>>>>>>this thing or some other.
>>
>>>>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
>>>>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
>>>>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
>>>>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>>
>>>>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>>
>>>>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>>
>>>>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>>
>>>>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>>Wow - what a comeback.
>>
>>>I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
>>>from your reply.
>>
>>>How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>>
>>>That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
>>>a winner.
>>
>>When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
>>further discussion. It seems you're part of that
>>class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>>
>><flush>- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
> called FACTS.
>
> Surely you can do that, can't you?
>
> Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
> In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
> without any form of malice.

Horse ****.
 
"seon ferguson"

> >> I dont get it, whats stopping the Muzzies fine hikackers from killing
all
> >> the passangers when they find they cant get to the pilot? How is that
> > dumb?
> >
> > What would be the problem? From the pilots point of view? Other than a
> > possibly long period of trauma therapy?
> >
> Well nothing but what about the passangers?

Would they be able to point the plane at some less favourable landingspot?

Christine!
>
>
 
In article <1183989593.355434.202010@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au says...
> On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
> > liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> > > On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>liamo'shea wrote:
> >
> > >>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
> > >>>wrote:
> >
> > >>>>liamo'shea wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
> > >>>>>wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>"liamo'shea"
> >
> > >>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
> > >>>>>>>and the CIA did.
> >
> > >>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
> >
> > >>>>>>ROTFLMAO
> >
> > >>>>>>Christine!
> >
> > >>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
> > >>>>>is coming.
> >
> > >>>>snip <more crap>
> >
> > >>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
> > >>>>this thing or some other.
> >
> > >>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
> > >>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
> > >>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
> > >>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
> >
> > >>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
> >
> > >>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
> >
> > >>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
> >
> > >>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > >>- Show quoted text -
> >
> > > Wow - what a comeback.
> >
> > > I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
> > > from your reply.
> >
> > > How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
> >
> > > That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
> > > a winner.
> >
> > When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
> > further discussion. It seems you're part of that
> > class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
> >
> > <flush>- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
> called FACTS.
>
> Surely you can do that, can't you?
>
> Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
> In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
> without any form of malice.
>
> Or could it be that you have never even seen them. Your views are
> simply that - your own gut instinct views.
>
> Sorry - but that just won't cut it in the real world.
>
>

Seems like you would be a perfect patsy for a medium to channel your
dead grandfather, and suck the cash right out of you. Alex Jones isn't
even in the same league as those con artists are.

BDK
 
In article <pr8493pfo9797m2g8fnqd7b1djcjf92qkq@4ax.com>, US says...
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:26:04 +1000, "seon ferguson" <seon@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> >< US > wrote in message news:mbnp83d01nmkl0393ska3kncsqkgdjllvi@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:14:29 -0500, "John P." <JohnP_Da_Bushkultie@MoronMe.com> wrote:
> >>>If you think that is something new and exciting from the current
> >>>administration ...
> >>
> >> Nobody said that.
> >>
> >> You're saying that any wrong you ever even imagined
> >> anywhere else would justify all the wrongs you support.
> >>
> >At least thats what some people in this group do like the right wing kooks
> >whom shall remain nameless.
>
> Oh, they'll start shrieking.
>
> When anyone objects to the crimes they support,
> they always start whimpering 'but someone else
> did something else' as if it'd justify their errors.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:16:39 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:
>
> >...I would like to read ...
>
> But you're a right-wing kook, so your masters
> don't allow you to do that.
>
>
>

LOL, if you had half a brain, you would have figured out I'm about as
big a lefty as there is.

But you don't have half a brain.

You poor kook.

BDK
 
In article <q59493pdpplbup37gpsfcfod40k4t328f9@4ax.com>, US says...
> "President Bush himself is an heir to these profits from the holocaust which were placed
> in a blind trust in 1980 by his father, former president George Herbert Walker Bush."
>
> http://www.takebackthemedia.com/newspro/arc77.html

Oh, everything on that page is 100% truthful and accurate!

>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:13:54 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:
>
> >... a new kook ...
> >BDK
>
> No, you're just the plain old garden-variety type.
>
> You falsely accuse your superiors due to your weakness.

You're claiming to be my superior?

BWHAHAHAHAHA! You aren't one of the Cicadas in my backyard's superior!

They buzz loudly. You spew kookery, loads of it.

>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 21:19:11 -0400, Bushkultie Deranged Kook BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:
>
> >... try to follow ...
>
> It was about profiteering.
>
> Do you even know what the word means?
>
> >... insanity,
> >BDK
>
> It's your best excuse for your support of the
> "Heir to the Holocaust".
>

Are you so far gone you can't even post worth a ****?

Tell dad you need more of them "Thinking Pills".

BDK
 
"BDK"

> Seems like you would be a perfect patsy for a medium to channel your
> dead grandfather, and suck the cash right out of you. Alex Jones isn't
> even in the same league as those con artists are.

I am open for channeling. For a meager $200 a seance..

Christine!
 
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:48:43 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>... poor kook.
>
>BDK

You keep groveling before fascists in your desperation.

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:26:04 +1000, "seon ferguson" <seon@iinet.net.au> wrote:

>< US > wrote in message news:mbnp83d01nmkl0393ska3kncsqkgdjllvi@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:14:29 -0500, "John P." <JohnP_Da_Bushkultie@MoronMe.com> wrote:
>>>If you think that is something new and exciting from the current
>>>administration ...
>>
>> Nobody said that.
>>
>> You're saying that any wrong you ever even imagined
>> anywhere else would justify all the wrongs you support.
>>
>At least thats what some people in this group do like the right wing kooks
>whom shall remain nameless.

Oh, they'll start shrieking.

When anyone objects to the crimes they support,
they always start whimpering 'but someone else
did something else' as if it'd justify their errors.




On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:16:39 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>...I would like to read ...

But you're a right-wing kook, so your masters
don't allow you to do that.
 
"President Bush himself is an heir to these profits from the holocaust which were placed
in a blind trust in 1980 by his father, former president George Herbert Walker Bush."

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/newspro/arc77.html

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:13:54 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>... a new kook ...
>BDK

No, you're just the plain old garden-variety type.

You falsely accuse your superiors due to your weakness.

On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 21:19:11 -0400, Bushkultie Deranged Kook BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>... try to follow ...

It was about profiteering.

Do you even know what the word means?

>... insanity,
>BDK

It's your best excuse for your support of the
"Heir to the Holocaust".

On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:54:36 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>Oh, everything on that page is 100% truthful and accurate!

You're utterly unable to dispute the fact that
Bush is the heir to the Holocaust.

>... spew kookery, loads of it.

It's all you have, you poor inferior thing.

>... can't even post worth a ****...
>BDK

No one had asked about you.
 
In article <46927ad8$0$2802$e4fe514c@dreader19.news.xs4all.nl>,
spam@christine.demon.nl says...
>
> "BDK"
>
> > Seems like you would be a perfect patsy for a medium to channel your
> > dead grandfather, and suck the cash right out of you. Alex Jones isn't
> > even in the same league as those con artists are.
>
> I am open for channeling. For a meager $200 a seance..
>
> Christine!
>
>
>

Hey, I will predict the future, just like Alex Jones, and I'll just take
a 5 buck "donation" for my "expenses".

I predict something bad will happen to someone tomorrow.

Bet I'll be right!

BDK
 
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:53:45 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:

>liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>
>> On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>
>>>liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
>>>>>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>>>
>>>>>>>>>Christine!
>>>
>>>>>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
>>>>>>>>is coming.
>>>
>>>>>>>snip <more crap>
>>>
>>>>>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
>>>>>>>this thing or some other.
>>>
>>>>>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
>>>>>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
>>>>>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
>>>>>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>>>
>>>>>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>>>
>>>>>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>>>
>>>>>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>>>
>>>>>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>>Wow - what a comeback.
>>>
>>>>I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
>>>>from your reply.
>>>
>>>>How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>>>
>>>>That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
>>>>a winner.
>>>
>>>When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
>>>further discussion. It seems you're part of that
>>>class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>>>
>>><flush>- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>
>> All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
>> called FACTS.
>>
>> Surely you can do that, can't you?
>>
>> Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
>> In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
>> without any form of malice.
>
>Horse ****.


I took the time to read many of the last couple of weeks posts made by
yourself - the majority slagging those who DARE to doubt the Official
911 Commission Report, (now there IS a load of horse **** for you), or
whom have any doubt whatsoever about 911.

Guess what.

Full of your opinions - but no verifiable facts.

Do you think I'm surprised?
 
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:47:03 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:

>In article <1183989593.355434.202010@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au says...
>> On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>> > liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>> > > On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >>liamo'shea wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
>> > >>>wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
>> > >>>>>wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>> >
>> > >>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
>> > >>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>> >
>> > >>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>> >
>> > >>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>> >
>> > >>>>>>Christine!
>> >
>> > >>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
>> > >>>>>is coming.
>> >
>> > >>>>snip <more crap>
>> >
>> > >>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
>> > >>>>this thing or some other.
>> >
>> > >>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
>> > >>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
>> > >>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
>> > >>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>> >
>> > >>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>> >
>> > >>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>> >
>> > >>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>> >
>> > >>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > >>- Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > Wow - what a comeback.
>> >
>> > > I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
>> > > from your reply.
>> >
>> > > How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>> >
>> > > That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
>> > > a winner.
>> >
>> > When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
>> > further discussion. It seems you're part of that
>> > class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>> >
>> > <flush>- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
>> called FACTS.
>>
>> Surely you can do that, can't you?
>>
>> Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
>> In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
>> without any form of malice.
>>
>> Or could it be that you have never even seen them. Your views are
>> simply that - your own gut instinct views.
>>
>> Sorry - but that just won't cut it in the real world.
>>
>>
>
>Seems like you would be a perfect patsy for a medium to channel your
>dead grandfather, and suck the cash right out of you. Alex Jones isn't
>even in the same league as those con artists are.
>
>BDK

So in other words I'm correct.

You have no verifiable facts to back your own views.

A continued attack on Alex Jones isn't going to make your 'gut
instinct' views more plausible.

Only verifiable facts will do that.

And calling me a patsy doesn't help either - it just shows an immature
attempt to avoid the issue (site facts to prove your statements).

Got any?
 
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:14:38 +0200, "CRxx" <spam@christine.demon.nl>
wrote:

>
>"BDK"
>
>> Seems like you would be a perfect patsy for a medium to channel your
>> dead grandfather, and suck the cash right out of you. Alex Jones isn't
>> even in the same league as those con artists are.
>
>I am open for channeling. For a meager $200 a seance..
>
>Christine!
>

Thanks for the offer - but no thanks.

You've already proven yourself a laughing fool in connection to the
attainment of knowledge and facts - I would presume your ability to
channel would be at the same level of astuteness.
 
liam o'shea wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:53:45 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
>>>>>>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Christine!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
>>>>>>>>>is coming.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>snip <more crap>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
>>>>>>>>this thing or some other.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
>>>>>>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
>>>>>>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
>>>>>>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>>>>
>>>>>>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>>>>
>>>>>>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>>>>
>>>>>>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>>>>
>>>>>>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>>Wow - what a comeback.
>>>>
>>>>>I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
>>>>
>>>>>from your reply.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>>>>
>>>>>That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
>>>>>a winner.
>>>>
>>>>When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
>>>>further discussion. It seems you're part of that
>>>>class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>>>>
>>>><flush>- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>
>>>All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
>>>called FACTS.
>>>
>>>Surely you can do that, can't you?
>>>
>>>Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
>>>In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
>>>without any form of malice.
>>
>>Horse ****.
>
>
>
> I took the time to read many of the last couple of weeks posts made by
> yourself - the majority slagging those who DARE to doubt the Official
> 911 Commission Report,

Feel free to point out any time in the last couple of weeks that I've
made any statement in support of the 9/11 Commission Report.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Countering a conspiracy
theory does not mean one supports any alternative theory, it simply
means I ain't buying your bullshit.
It's not the "truth" movement vs the official reports, it's the "truth"
movement vs reality.

I slag those who question reality, reports be damned.
 
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:56:05 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:

>liam o'shea wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:53:45 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>liam.oshea@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Jul 9, 10:29 pm, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>liam.os...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jul 9, 11:24 am, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:12:54 -0500, nonsense <nonse...@unsettled.com>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>liamo'shea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:39 +0200, "CRxx" <s...@christine.demon.nl>
>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"liamo'shea"
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Would appear he did a hell of a lot better than the Government, FBI
>>>>>>>>>>>>and the CIA did.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Give the man credit where credit is due.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Christine!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So a couple of months before 911, Alex Jones is warning that an attack
>>>>>>>>>>is coming.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>snip <more crap>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Every day of every year there are poeple predicting
>>>>>>>>>this thing or some other.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Every once in a while one of them gets lucky and their
>>>>>>>>>prediction comes true. They rush to take credit, while
>>>>>>>>>the other millions of predictions are quickly forgotten
>>>>>>>>>as should the lucky one have been as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If he was some nutcase soothsayer, I'd agree with you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>However, his research is tangible and valid.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And the attacks DID occur, didn't they?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're about as convincing asZook.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>>>Wow - what a comeback.
>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm sitting here literally stunned speechless by the intellect oozing
>>>>>
>>>>>>from your reply.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>How about adding a couple of facts to prove yourself correct as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>>That, combined with your previous einstonian retort, would have to be
>>>>>>a winner.
>>>>>
>>>>>When the egg is rotten you throw it away without
>>>>>further discussion. It seems you're part of that
>>>>>class, along withzookand a pottyfull of others.
>>>>>
>>>>><flush>- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>All you need do is prove your point of view - with a little thing
>>>>called FACTS.
>>>>
>>>>Surely you can do that, can't you?
>>>>
>>>>Alex Jones sites facts and posts links for everyone to see and study.
>>>>In fact he asks you to study them and come to your own conslusion -
>>>>without any form of malice.
>>>
>>>Horse ****.
>>
>>
>>
>> I took the time to read many of the last couple of weeks posts made by
>> yourself - the majority slagging those who DARE to doubt the Official
>> 911 Commission Report,
>
>Feel free to point out any time in the last couple of weeks that I've
>made any statement in support of the 9/11 Commission Report.
>I've said it before and I'll say it again: Countering a conspiracy
>theory does not mean one supports any alternative theory, it simply
>means I ain't buying your bullshit.
>It's not the "truth" movement vs the official reports, it's the "truth"
>movement vs reality.
>
>I slag those who question reality, reports be damned.


I didn't say you support the 911 Commission Report - I said you bag
others who doubt it.

In other words, those who do not agree with your own interpretation of
the event, are, in your interpretation, wrong.

And that is incorrect - because you don't supply facts, only a self
interpretation, which is worth about the same as anyone else with an
unproven, non factual theory.

To find the truth, you will have to take a risk and voice a theory,
which will be challenged, and you will risk being called a kook and
conspiracy nut.

Too many do this on gut instinct, a feeling, call it what you will.

But without some basis of fact to back that theory, it is, (in your
own words), bullshit.

You can say Alex Jones is incorrect, you can call him a conspiracy
theorist or nutcase - but at least, like him, back your statements
with facts.

This is something that you, unfortunately, do not appear to be able,
or want, to do.
 
BDK wrote:

> In article <pr8493pfo9797m2g8fnqd7b1djcjf92qkq@4ax.com>, US says...
>
>>On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:26:04 +1000, "seon ferguson" <seon@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>< US > wrote in message news:mbnp83d01nmkl0393ska3kncsqkgdjllvi@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:14:29 -0500, "John P." <JohnP_Da_Bushkultie@MoronMe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If you think that is something new and exciting from the current
>>>>>administration ...
>>>>
>>>>Nobody said that.
>>>>
>>>>You're saying that any wrong you ever even imagined
>>>>anywhere else would justify all the wrongs you support.
>>>>
>>>
>>>At least thats what some people in this group do like the right wing kooks
>>>whom shall remain nameless.
>>
>>Oh, they'll start shrieking.
>>
>>When anyone objects to the crimes they support,
>>they always start whimpering 'but someone else
>>did something else' as if it'd justify their errors.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:16:39 -0400, BDK <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>...I would like to read ...
>>
>>But you're a right-wing kook, so your masters
>>don't allow you to do that.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> LOL, if you had half a brain, you would have figured out I'm about as
> big a lefty as there is.
>
> But you don't have half a brain.
>
> You poor kook.

Left and right meet again off the chart.
 

Similar threads

B
Backlink Hut Backlink Review
Replies
0
Views
126
Backlink Hut
B
N
Top 10 Online Slots
Replies
0
Views
156
NathanJar
N
Cloaked
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Terms of Service and Disclaimer
Replies
0
Views
2K
Cloaked
Cloaked
WorldNews
Official: Trump briefed on potentially compromising report
Replies
0
Views
21
WorldNews
WorldNews
WorldNews
Obama points finger at Putin for cyber attacks on U.S. election
Replies
0
Views
29
WorldNews
WorldNews
Back
Top