timesjoke

Damn hugo, that was harsh....true but harsh. Yes the MJ craze is on, everyone is digging in the attic or rummaging in the garage looking for this or that "treasure". Right now there are 21,253 items on ebay for him and it should get much, much bigger over the next few days.

I don't know hugo, the thing that seems to be different with MLK and Al is Al loves to start crap then leave the community all riled up. The Jena 6 comes to mind as a great example. Maybe MLK would have changed to that, but at the time of his death, he did not show that quality so I will not assume he would have done those things. Al is simply getting paid to divide us, MLK was trying to bring us together.

The word "Sultry" comes to mind for them as well.

But it would cost more to let these girls get pregnant, this is my point. We should be trying to prevent unwanted pregnancies is my point and so far, this is the only program I have heard of that has been successful for high risk girls. Everything else has failed, why not give prevention a chance? And true most of the time. I have made a big part of my life dedicated to watching how people behave. The first thing a woman does when she walks into a room like at a party or bar is too look around the room very carefully.......but she is not checking out the men as a man would look at the woman......nope, she is doing a threat assessment of the other women in the room. I am not saying it is all the woman's fault, in many ways they are raised to be in constant competition with other women over their looks and the media and stores have all banded together to exploit and expand this mentality in women in every way possible. You miss one very important aspect, something that completely changes the situation. I don't "HATE" Obama. He is a good looking guy I suppose, but looks or the lack of them do not change who he is. I do not identify myself with my looks or a comparison to myself to another man based on looks......women very often do. As I pointed out in my reply to eddo, my point was only directed at those who have this unfounded hatred of Sarah, there is no honest or reasonable reason to hate her, so there must be something else digging at these women who show the hatred. I have an open mind, please educate me on why you feel so many liberal women hate her so much? Hate is a powerful thing. To quote one liberal women's group, Palin would be a massive "step backward" for all women if she were to be vice President Why would any woman being in either of the top two jobs of politics be a step back? Why say something so completely stupid and uneducated? Clearly it would not be a step backward so these groups are talking from hate.......why the hate?

I will only say that was funny, I will not add to it because that would be poor actions on my part, wez this is my only comment to you, I still have you on ignore and that is where you will stay, we are oil and water, no way we can mix so in the name of keeping the peace I will leave you on ignore forever. Please do not take this as an insult, I simply do not have the capacity to fight the windmills anymore. Sometimes we have to accept it is better to avoid a situation that has no valuable outcome for either side. God bless you and please accept my deepest apologies for anything you feel I have done wrong to you in the past, I cannot live in the past so I ask you to let it go as well and we move foward just leaving each other alone. Thanks and have a great day.

And? You didn't know MLK was trying to help his people? Notice I also said "to help both his people and America as for the betterment of all." You getting into nitpicking mode eddo?

Nope, as usual you miss the forest for the trees. I prefaced my comment to be only about women who have an unreasonable hatred of Sarah. The unreasonable hatred must come from somewhere right? I gave my opinion of where it comes from....am I not allowed my opinion of where resentment of this poisionous level comes from? Taking everything Sarah has accomplished as a woman, there is really no reason to hate her, maybe not support her, but the hatred is wrong. I agree, but not all hard work is a job. Climbing a mountain is hard work, but does that equal a job? Job as defined in modern society is something you should get paid for, people who created children should not get paid for taking care of what they made, it is their responsibility, they made the kids, not the Government. Where the difference with this program is it is a "preventive" measure to reduce the number of unwanted babies that come into the world and the Government pays for anyway. Either way the Government pays, so do we want the lower number or the higher number?

[attach=full]1637[/attach] Watch Hillary dodge her husband's kiss but take one from Obama...... [attach=full]1638[/attach] Funny, Funny, Funny......

I am glad I didn't say that and can just get away with agreeing with you, lol. There are two very big things I believe most women hate about Sarah, one is she is hot, very hot, way too hot and she makes them look bad because if Sarah can still look hot after several children, all women have the same ability, they just lack the motivation. Second is she does not support abortion and abortion is the blind banner topic for a lot of women groups, for them if your not a supporter of abortion, they will hate you no matter how many other great qualities you may possess. Oh, and taking care of your own children is not a job, I see it as a responsibility and a great pleasure in my life. Sure it can test you sometimes but as parents we asked for chilcren, it was something we had a choice over, so why see it as a job?

MLK was about getting along, tearing down barriers, patching fences, humans seeing each other as one, not as one color or another. All this done to help both his people and America as for the betterment of all. Al is all about division, strife, sensationalism, games and political expediency all done to further his own glory and increase his bank account. MLK cared about people, Al only cares about himself.

Why would I be mad? I think it is very funny, lol [attach=full]1636[/attach]

Brother, I like you and all that but if I knew that, I would want the job for myself and I wouldn't tell anyone else, lol. She is hot.

Scream that over a loudspeaker in every city in the Nation and the dumb masses will still refuse to hear you. ?A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

Well RO, I for one support what you said. Even dangling his kid over the balcony was unforgivable in my mind. Farrah was a classy lady, too bad her passing will be all but ignored now.

Reserved, Okay, this will be a limited engagement, only 100 shows in all and we will be offering premium passes that include one photo with our dancer Ali, unclothed of course in any possition requested by the pass holder. As our first customer, IWS will receive a premium pass for free. Thank you for your support IWS. We are considering souvenirs such as the Ali 'Budda' statue offered in both small and 1/2 scale sizes. An American flag with her photo on it so when you fly your flag, the wind makes it look like Ali is dancing over your home, this would be a nice gift for all the servicemen you know. And of course the coffee cup image that has Ali undressing as you slowly sip down your coffee. Any other ideas for souvenirs are welcome and a royalty for those ideas will be included on a per item sale basis. Thanks for your your time, our lines are now open for reservations.........

Wow, could you imagine the cost of that program? During Roman times as their morals declined politicians became famous for having a page. Now a page was similar to what we call a page here in America in they were young people involved in politics and that is why we most likely used the same name but there was a difference. A page in Roman times was a young boy homosexual lover for the politician. It was a status symbol for a politician to have one of these young boy lovers with them at all times. Now as our own morals decline we see that even here in America, our pages are involved in sexual relations with the politicians. Maybe the only real solution is to assign each politician a sex assistant and be done with it?

Again that is why I was so low in all the estimates. How many of the girls will have more then one kid or have difficult pregnancies that cost way more. Even if you cut the numbers in half you still have just under 1 million as cost versus over 13 million dollars, even that makes it a no brainer.......if we are doing any welfare, I still prefer the Chi idea but I believe going from the free - for - all liberal welfare State to nothing is as close to impossible as it gets. So I will try to push for, and hope for, alternative things that work for prevention over things that work to giving up and just tossing money at the unwanted results.

lol, me thinks you are onto something there

Sure, I will just charge admission

Linda carter was the one I was crazy over in my youth. [attach=full]2344[/attach]

Yep, pretty sure we have worse, and as long as your working enough to pay your bills and not on welfare or something sure, your welcome here, lol.

That was a joke Ali, lighten up, I hate the idea of our President doing this just like you. My joke was the hot stupid chick would have been too stupid to save the dress, lol. Monica was a schemer, I am not a schemer. I show schemers how pathetic their attempts to control things really are.

Ali, it is still more cost effective to not have the girls get pregnant, all at once or spread out you still see that 119 babies cost $27 mil while the prevention is $1 mil, that is a no brainer in my book. Why save a mil and then just let these girls cost the Government $27 mil down the road? It is always easier to not break an egg then it is to clean up the egg after you dropped it. Up to now 99% of all Government programs are about what to do 'after' the girls get pregnant, I am happy someone is finally trying to find a way to teach prevention. It is not fair, but it is the girls who have to take the lead on this issue. There is an old saying, we only know for sure who the mother is. It is estimated that about 1/3 of all men paying support are paying for kids they did not create. The system is designed to get any man possible assigned as the father to help support children as it is but this system does nothing for stopping the unwanted children in the first place. I agree with you completely Chi. Why? Because the majority of Americans vote for socialist leaders who create systems like family services who seem to abuse good parents and ignore bad parents. Young children are educated on how to contact children's services at very young ages so now we have generations of children raised by the Government instead of parents. Add to that the single largest growing segment of society is the single mother and you have a tired, single parent who does not have the ability to do it all and who must lean heavily on the Government to do what she can't. Children raising themselves. I like your idea though, end all welfare, take the money out of making babies and most would have to start taking this more seriously.

Well she did save the dress, that was a very slick move. Give me the hot stupid chick over the frumpy fat smart chick every time, lol.

HOLY cow she is turning Conservative !!!!!! Of course I would agree with that idea, it is awsome, end all welfare and let the survival of the fittest take over. But, if we are going to have welfare, I would rather $1 mill in prevention over $27 mil in long term welfare. That is why I went very, very low on my numbers. Out of the 119 births for example to low income and very young mother there is a high degree of complications. Most will also have more than just one child. Most will cost the Government more than $500 each a month. The number I posted is way, way low.