R
rbwinn
Guest
On Mar 7, 6:15�am, "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 12:51?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote:
> > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote:
> > > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>> On Mar 6, 2:40 am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:13:03 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>> ? - Refer: <j6SdnbyJ15LcQXHYnZ2dnUVZ_uXin...@comcast.com>
> > > >>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Mar 5, 11:48?am, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> On 4 Mar., 17:21, "H. Wm. Esque" <HEs...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>>>>>news:1173018520.978855.246000@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> > > >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 12:05?am, "H. Wm. Esque" <HEs...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> "Scott Richter" <scottrichter...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>>>> snip
> > > >>>>>>>>> Matthew 10:14
> > > >>>>>>>>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
> > > >>>>>>>>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
> > > >>>>>>>> Christians who do not heed this verse are in violation of the very
> > > >>>>>>>> faith they profess. There is no Biblical authorization to "shove ones
> > > >>>>>>>> religion down the throat of another person". An atheist who wants
> > > >>>>>>>> a defense against over-bearing proselytizers should be able to
> > > >>>>>>>> point to this verse as a defense
> > > >>>>>>> We have, and, just like you and the inane champion of the world
> > > >>>>>>> (little Winn), they ignore it.
> > > >>>>>> Well, as I told you before, that was Christ's instruction to his
> > > >>>>>> twelve apostles. ?I am not an apostle.
> > > >>>>>> I am just an ordinary person quoting verses from Isaiah.
> > > >>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >>>>> Logical fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis:
> > > >>>>> "An ad hoc hypothesis is one created to explain away facts that seem to
> > > >>>>> refute one's theory." -- ?http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html
> > > >>>> One has to actually have a theory in the first place.
> > > >>>> Bobby has only crazed schizophrenic ramblings.
> > > >>> You were the ones who were trying to promote me to the position of
> > > >>> apostle. ?You have no authority to make any such promotion. ? I am not
> > > >>> being sent with the same responsibility the apostles were given. ?I
> > > >>> have yet to see you use any verse of the Bible in context. ?All you
> > > >>> ever do is take random verses and apply them according to your
> > > >>> interpretation.
> > > >>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >> Robert, why would you believe that you are somehow exempt from a simple
> > > >> instruction in your manual: to beat a speedy retreat from any place like
> > > >> alt dot atheism where your proselytizing is not welcome, and 'shake the
> > > >> dust of that place off your feet' [don't have anything further to do
> > > >> with it]?
>
> > > >> Your hypothesis that things in your manual only apply to the original
> > > >> twelve apostles is just the fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis. If they were
> > > >> to apply only to the original twelve apostles then there would be no
> > > >> proselytizing today, would there?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > Who told you I was proselytizing?
> > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > You did, Robert, when you started quoting your book of myth to us
> > > non-believers.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Oh, I see, you have forbidden all people from quoting from the Bible.
>
> Oops.
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 12:51?am, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote:
> > > rbwinn wrote:
> > > > On Mar 6, 2:21?pm, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net> wrote:
> > > >> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>> On Mar 6, 2:40 am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:13:03 -0800, Sippuuden <s...@macrosoft.net>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>> ? - Refer: <j6SdnbyJ15LcQXHYnZ2dnUVZ_uXin...@comcast.com>
> > > >>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Mar 5, 11:48?am, "thomas p." <tonyofbe...@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> On 4 Mar., 17:21, "H. Wm. Esque" <HEs...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> "JessHC" <jes...@phantomemail.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>>>>>news:1173018520.978855.246000@64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> > > >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 12:05?am, "H. Wm. Esque" <HEs...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> "Scott Richter" <scottrichter...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>>>> snip
> > > >>>>>>>>> Matthew 10:14
> > > >>>>>>>>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
> > > >>>>>>>>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
> > > >>>>>>>> Christians who do not heed this verse are in violation of the very
> > > >>>>>>>> faith they profess. There is no Biblical authorization to "shove ones
> > > >>>>>>>> religion down the throat of another person". An atheist who wants
> > > >>>>>>>> a defense against over-bearing proselytizers should be able to
> > > >>>>>>>> point to this verse as a defense
> > > >>>>>>> We have, and, just like you and the inane champion of the world
> > > >>>>>>> (little Winn), they ignore it.
> > > >>>>>> Well, as I told you before, that was Christ's instruction to his
> > > >>>>>> twelve apostles. ?I am not an apostle.
> > > >>>>>> I am just an ordinary person quoting verses from Isaiah.
> > > >>>>>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >>>>> Logical fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis:
> > > >>>>> "An ad hoc hypothesis is one created to explain away facts that seem to
> > > >>>>> refute one's theory." -- ?http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html
> > > >>>> One has to actually have a theory in the first place.
> > > >>>> Bobby has only crazed schizophrenic ramblings.
> > > >>> You were the ones who were trying to promote me to the position of
> > > >>> apostle. ?You have no authority to make any such promotion. ? I am not
> > > >>> being sent with the same responsibility the apostles were given. ?I
> > > >>> have yet to see you use any verse of the Bible in context. ?All you
> > > >>> ever do is take random verses and apply them according to your
> > > >>> interpretation.
> > > >>> Robert B. Winn
> > > >> Robert, why would you believe that you are somehow exempt from a simple
> > > >> instruction in your manual: to beat a speedy retreat from any place like
> > > >> alt dot atheism where your proselytizing is not welcome, and 'shake the
> > > >> dust of that place off your feet' [don't have anything further to do
> > > >> with it]?
>
> > > >> Your hypothesis that things in your manual only apply to the original
> > > >> twelve apostles is just the fallacy of ad hoc hypothesis. If they were
> > > >> to apply only to the original twelve apostles then there would be no
> > > >> proselytizing today, would there?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > Who told you I was proselytizing?
> > > > Robert B. Winn
>
> > > You did, Robert, when you started quoting your book of myth to us
> > > non-believers.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Oh, I see, you have forbidden all people from quoting from the Bible.
>
> Oops.