J
JessHC
Guest
Gabriel wrote:
> On Apr 6, 1:11 pm, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
> > "Gabriel" <gabriel_bapt...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > It's in the Bible. And to act like "its only in a book, so its false"
> >
> > Fine. So where's the objective, verifiable evidence that it's true?
>
> Where's the objective, verifiable evidence that all the history
> facts from the past few thousand years that you do "believe" are
> true as well?
A red herring.
> And have you seen them? No? And yet you believe
> everything else you gotten the same way: from books, while wanting to
> assume the same methods are not enough and that this particual similar
> method is just flat out completely false when it comes to the Bible!
That you can't figure out why is only your problem.
> People are using circular logic when it's convenient, creating your
> own brand of "hypocritical logic".
Where? Who?
> Are you going to respond with the
> end all "you're a pompous ass" again to make your point? I hope you
> can rise above such hate and ignorance.
Pointing out that you're a pompous ass isn't "hate and ignorance;"
it's accurate observation.
> God Bless!
>
> Praise the Lord!
You're a pompous ass.
> On Apr 6, 1:11 pm, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
> > "Gabriel" <gabriel_bapt...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > It's in the Bible. And to act like "its only in a book, so its false"
> >
> > Fine. So where's the objective, verifiable evidence that it's true?
>
> Where's the objective, verifiable evidence that all the history
> facts from the past few thousand years that you do "believe" are
> true as well?
A red herring.
> And have you seen them? No? And yet you believe
> everything else you gotten the same way: from books, while wanting to
> assume the same methods are not enough and that this particual similar
> method is just flat out completely false when it comes to the Bible!
That you can't figure out why is only your problem.
> People are using circular logic when it's convenient, creating your
> own brand of "hypocritical logic".
Where? Who?
> Are you going to respond with the
> end all "you're a pompous ass" again to make your point? I hope you
> can rise above such hate and ignorance.
Pointing out that you're a pompous ass isn't "hate and ignorance;"
it's accurate observation.
> God Bless!
>
> Praise the Lord!
You're a pompous ass.